Analysis of contact force and uplift of pantograph–catenary system in overlap section based on numerical simulations and experimental tests

Reference

• Ambrósio J, Pombo J, Pereira M, et al. Recent developments in pantograph-catenary interaction modelling and analysis. Int J Railway Technol. 2012;1(1):249–278.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Bucca G, Carnevale M, et al. Pantograph-catenary interaction: recent achievements and future research challenges. Int J Rail Transportation. 2018;6(2):57–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil J, Gregori S, Tur M, et al. Analytical model of the pantograph-catenary dynamic interaction and comparison with numerical simulations. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2022;60(1): 132–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Mei G, Wu X, et al. Hybrid simulation of dynamics for the pantograph-catenary system. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2002;38(6):393–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massat J P, Laine J P, Bobillot A. Pantograph-catenary dynamics simulation. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2006;44(suppl 1):551–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Rønnquist A, Nåvik P. Assessment of the high-frequency response in railway pantograph-catenary interaction based on numerical simulation. IEEE T Veh Technol. 2020;69(10):10596–10605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nåvik P, Rønnquist A, Stichel S. Identification of system damping in railway catenary wire systems from full-scale measurements. Eng Struct. 2016;113:71–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Garcia O, Carnicero A, Torres V. Computation of the initial equilibrium of railway overheads based on the catenary equation. Eng Struct. 2006;28(10):1387–1394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Such M, Jimenez-Octavio J R, Carnicero A, et al. An approach based on the catenary equation to deal with static analysis of three dimensional cable structures. Eng Struct. 2009;31(9):2162–2170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C J, Zhang W H, Zhang J, et al. Static form-finding analysis of a railway catenary using a dynamic equilibrium method based on flexible multibody system formulation with absolute nodal coordinates and controls. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2017;39(3):221–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori S, Tur M, Nadal E, et al. An approach to geometric optimisation of railway catenaries. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2018;56(8):1162–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nåvik P, Rønnquist A, Stichel S. Variation in predicting pantograph–catenary interaction contact forces, numerical simulations and field measurements. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2017;55(9):1265–1282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrósio J, Rauter F, Pombo J, et al. A flexible multibody pantograph model for the analysis of the catenary-pantograph contact. In: Arczewski K, Blajer W, Fraczek J, Wojtyra M, editor. Multibody dynamics. computational methods in applied sciences. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011. p. 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Song Y, Ouyang H, Liu Z, et al. Active control of contact force for high-speed railway pantograph-catenary based on multi-body pantograph model. Mech Mach Theory. 2017;115:35–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappalardo C M, Patel M D, Tinsley B, et al. Contact force control in multibody pantograph/catenary systems. P I Mech Eng K-J Mul. 2016;230(4):307–328.
   Google Scholar
• Rauter F G, Pombo J, Ambrósio J, et al. Contact model for the pantograph-catenary interaction. J System Design Dynamics. 2007;1(3):447–457.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni S, Pappalardo C M, Shabana A A. Pantograph/catenary contact formulations. J Vib Acoust. 2017;139(1):011010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Antunes P, Pombo J, et al. A methodology to study high-speed pantograph-catenary interaction with realistic contact wire irregularities. Mech Mach Theory. 2020;152:103940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Núñez A, Liu Z, et al. Analysis of the evolvement of contact wire wear irregularity in railway catenary based on historical data. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2018;56(8):1207–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K. Analysis of dynamic contact between overhead wire and pantograph of a high-speed electric train. P I Mech Eng F-J Rai. 2007;221(2):157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Seo J H, Kim S W, Jung I H, et al. Dynamic analysis of a pantograph–catenary system using absolute nodal coordinates. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2006;44(8):615–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pombo J, Ambrósio J. Environmental and track perturbations on multiple pantograph interaction with catenaries in high-speed trains. Comput Struct. 2013;124:88–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Zou D, Tan M, et al. Review of pantograph and catenary interaction. Front Mech Eng. 2018;13(2):311–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Yang Y, Yang Y, et al. Study on galloping oscillation of iced catenary system under cross winds. Shock Vib. 2017;2017:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Zhou N, Mei G, et al. Dynamic analysis of pantograph-catenary system considering Ice coating. Shock Vib. 2020;2020:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan F, Liu Z, Song Y, et al. Influences of ice load and air damping on dynamic current collection of pantograph-iced catenary. J Southwest Jiaotong Univ. 2016;1:25.
   Google Scholar
• Stickland M T, Scanlon T J, Craighead I A, et al. An investigation into the mechanical damping characteristics of catenary contact wires and their effect on aerodynamic galloping instability. P I Mech Eng F-J Rai. 2003;217(2):63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Song Y, Liu Z, Wang H, et al. Nonlinear analysis of wind-induced vibration of high-speed railway catenary and its influence on pantograph-catenary interaction. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2016;54(6):723–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Liu Z, Wang H, et al. Analysis of the galloping behaviour of an electrified railway overhead contact line using the non-linear finite element method. P I Mech Eng F-J Rai. 2018;232(10):2339–2352.
   Google Scholar
• Pombo J, Ambrósio J, Pereira M, et al. Influence of the aerodynamic forces on the pantograph-catenary system for high-speed trains. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2009;47(11):1327–1347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale M, Facchinetti A, Rocchi D. Procedure to assess the role of railway pantograph components in generating the aerodynamic uplift. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2017;160:16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Wang Z, Liu Z, et al. A spatial coupling model to study dynamic performance of pantograph-catenary with vehicle-track excitation. Mech Syst Signal Pr. 2021;151:107336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai W M, Cai C B. Effect of locomotive vibrations on pantograph-catenary system dynamics. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 1998;29(S1):47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Zou D, Zhou N, et al. A study on the mechanism of vehicle body vibration affecting the dynamic interaction in the pantograph-catenary system. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2021;59(9):1335–1354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Yang Z, Li Q, et al. Analysis of the near-field and far-field sound pressure generated by high-speed trains pantograph system. Appl Acoust. 2020;169:107506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai Z, Li T, Deng J, et al. Effect of the strip spacing on the aerodynamic performance of a high-speed double-strip pantograph. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2021;2021:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai Z, Li T, Zhou N, et al. Numerical simulation and optimization of aerodynamic uplift force of a high-speed pantograph. Railway Eng Sci. 2022;30(1):117–128.
   Google Scholar
• Li T, Qin D, Zhang W, et al. Study on the aerodynamic noise characteristics of high-speed pantographs with different strip spacings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2020;202:104191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhang J, Li T, et al. Influence of pantograph fixing position on aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed trains. J Modern Transportation. 2017;25(1):34–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu M, Fujii Y. Improvement of structure of contact wire on overlap sections of Shinkansen. Q Rep RTRI. 2000;41(4):159–162.
   Google Scholar
• Mei G, Zhang W, Zhao H, et al. A hybrid method to simulate the interaction of pantograph and catenary on overlap span. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2006;44(suppl 1):571–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon S Y, Lee K W, Cho Y H. A dropper length calculation method of the elevating span in overlap area. Proceedings of the KSR Conference. The Korean Society for Railway. 2011. p. 1503–1510.
   Google Scholar
• Gregori S, Gil J, Tur M, et al. Analysis of the overlap section in a high-speed railway catenary by means of numerical simulations. Eng Struct. 2020;221:110963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhendong L, Stichel S, Anders R. Numerical study on the dynamic behaviour of railway catenary overlap section for higher speed. First International Conference on Rail Transportation, China: Chengdu; 2017 July 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization EN50318. Railway applications-current collection systems-validation of simulation of the dynamic interaction between pantograph and overhead contact line. Brussels: CENELEC Central Secretariat; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• VO Van O, Massat J P, Laurent C, et al. Introduction of variability into pantograph–catenary dynamic simulations. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2014;52(10):1254–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Jönsson P A, Stichel S, et al. Implications of the operation of multiple pantographs on the soft catenary systems in Sweden. P I Mech Eng F-J Rai. 2016;230(3):971–983.
   Google Scholar
• Gaing Z L, Chang R F. Optimal PID controller for high-speed rail pantograph system with notch filter. TENCON 2009-2009 IEEE Region 10 Conference. Silverspring (MD): IEEE; 2009. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Song D, Jiang Y, Zhang W. Dynamic performance of a pantograph–catenary system with consideration of the contact surface. P I Mech Eng F-J Rai. 2018;232(1):262–274.
   Google Scholar
• Lin T C, Yeh J L, Kuo C H, et al. Adaptive fuzzy sliding mode active vibration control for rail vehicle pantograph. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE). Silverspring (MD): IEEE; 2016. P. 373–379.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Ambrósio J, Carnicero A, et al. The results of the pantograph–catenary interaction benchmark. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2015;53(3):412–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar