A quasi-steady-state minimum lap time simulation of race motorcycles using experimental data

References

• Cossalter V, Da Lio M, Lot R, et al. A general method for the evaluation of vehicle manoeuvrability with special emphasis on motorcycles. Veh Syst Dyn. 1999;31(2):113–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanova D, Sharp RS, Symonds P. Minimum time manoeuvring: the significance of yaw inertia. Veh Syst Dyn. 2000;34(2):77–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon B, Vittore C, Matteo M, et al. Application of the ‘Optimal Maneuver Method’ for enhancing racing motorcycle performance. SAE Int J Passeng Cars Mech Syst. 2009;1(1):1311–1318.
   Google Scholar
• Lot R, Evanhelou SA. Lap time optimization of a sports series hybrid electric vehicle. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2013; 2013 July 3–5; London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cossalter V, Lot R, Tavernini D. Optimization of the centre of mass position of a racing motorcycle in dry and wet tracks by means of the ‘optimal maneuver method’. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM); 2013 Feb 27-Mar 1; Vicenza, Italy: IEEE; 2013. p. 412–417.
   Google Scholar
• Lot R, Biral F. A curvilinear abscissa approach for the lap time optimization of racing vehicles. IFAC Proc. 2014;47(3):7559–7565.
   Google Scholar
• Perantoni G, Limebeer DJN. Optimal control for a formula one car with variable parameters. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(5):653–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limebeer DJN, Perantoni G, Rao AV. Optimal control of formula one car energy recovery systems. Int J Contr. 2014;87(10):2065–2080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perantoni G, Limebeer DJN. Optimal control of a formula one car on a three-dimensional track – part 1: track modeling and identification. J Dyn Syst Meas Contr. 2015;137(5):051018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perantoni G, Limebeer DJN. Optimal control of a formula one car on a three-dimensional track – part 2: optimal control. J Dyn Syst Meas Contr. 2015;137(5):051019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Bianco N, Lot R, Gadola M. Minimum time optimal control simulation of a GP2 race car. J Automob Eng. 2018;232(9):1180–1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaro M, Marconi E. The effect of engine spin direction on the dynamics of powered two wheelers. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56(4):604–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler B, Deakin A, Crolla D. Lap time simulation: comparison of steady state: quasi-static and transient racing car cornering strategies. Proceedings of the 2000 SAE Motorsports Engineering Conference and Exposition; 2000 Nov 13–16; Dearborn, Michigan; SAE 2000 Transactions J Passeng Cars – Mech Syst; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Brayshaw D, Harrison M. Use of numerical optimization to determine the effect of the roll stiffness distribution on race car performance. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng. 2005;219(10):1141–1151.
   Google Scholar
• Brayshaw D, Harrison M. A quasi steady state approach to race car lap simulation in order to understand the effects of racing line and centre of gravity location. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng. 2005;219(6):725–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkl T, Muehlmeier M. Extended steady state lap time simulation for analyzing transient vehicle behavior. SAE Int J Passeng Cars Mech Syst. 2013;6(1):283–292.
   Google Scholar
• Veneri M, Massaro M. A free-trajectory quasi-steady-state optimal-control method for minimum lap-time of race vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020;58(6):933–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovato S, Massaro M, Limebeer DJN. Curved-ribbon-based track modelling for minimum lap-time optimisation. Meccanica. 2021;56:2139–2152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovato S, Massaro M. A three-dimensional free-trajectory quasi-steady-state optimal-control method for minimum-lap-time of race vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2022;60(5):1512–1530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolazzi E, Biral F, Da Lio M. Symbolic-numeric indirect method for solving optimal control problems for large multibody systems. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2005;13:233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Bianco N, Bertolazzi E, Biral F. Comparison of direct and indirect methods for minimum lap time optimal control problems. Veh Syst Dyn. 2019;57(5):665–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaro M, Limebeer DJN. Minimum-lap-time optimisation and simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2021;59(7):1069–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biral F, Lot R. An interpretative model of g-g diagrams of racing motorcycle. Proceedings of the 3rd ICMEM International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics; 2009 Oct 21–23; Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Song Z, Zhigang R, Deng Q, et al. General models for estimating daily and monthly mean daily diffuse solar radiation in China’s subtropical monsoon climatic zone. Renew Energy. 2020;145:318–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younes S, Claywell R, Muneer T. Quality control of solar radiation data: present status and proposed new approach. Energy. 2005;30:1533–1549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limebeer DJN, Massaro M. Dynamics and optimal control of road vehicles. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Tremlett AJ, Assadian F, Purdy DJ, et al. Quasi-steady-state linearisation of the racing vehicle acceleration envelope: a limited slip differential example. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(11):1416–1442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossalter V. Motorcycle dynamics. [place unknown]: Lulu; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson MA, Rao AV. GPOPS-II: A MATLAB software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using hp-adaptive Gaussian quadrature collocation methods and sparse nonlinear programming. ACM T Math Softw. 2014;41(1):1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein MJ, Rao AV. Algorithm 984: adigator, a toolbox for the algorithmic differentiation of mathematical functions in matlab using source transformation via operator overloading. ACM Trans Math Softw. 2017;44(2):21–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachter A, Biegler LT. On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math Program. 2006;106(1):25–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar