Adaptive authority allocation for shared steering control considering social behaviours: a hybrid fuzzy approach with game-theoretical vehicle interaction model

References

• Ersal T, Kolmanovsky I, Masoud N. et al. Connected and automated road vehicles: state of the art and future challenges. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020;58(5):672–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Huang Y, Khajepour A. et al. Ethical decision-making platform in autonomous vehicles with lexicographic optimization based model predictive controller. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2020;69(8):8164–8175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi B, Cao H, Song X. et al. How to identify the take-over criticality in conditionally automated driving? an examination using drivers' physiological parameters and situational factors. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2022;85:161–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing Y, Lv C, Cao D. et al. Toward human-vehicle collaboration: review and perspectives on human-centered collaborative automated driving. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2021;128. Article ID: 103199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Liu Y, Na X. et al. Preview-scheduled steering assistance control for co-piloting vehicle: a human-like methodology. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020;58(4):518–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merah A, Hartani K, Draou A. A new shared control for lane keeping and road departure prevention. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(1):86–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan Z, Carvalho A, Tseng HE. et al. A predictive control framework for torque-based steering assistance to improve safety in highway driving. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56(5):810–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcano M, Díaz S, Pérez J. et al. A review of shared control for automated vehicles: theory and applications. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst. 2020;50(6):475–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Cao H, Li G. et al. A two-layer potential-field-driven model predictive shared control towards driver-automation cooperation. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2020;23(5):4415–4431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue M, Fang C, Zhang H. et al. Adaptive authority allocation-based driver-automation shared control for autonomous vehicles. Accid Anal Prev. 2021;160. Article ID: 106301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Wang C, Zhao W. et al. Driving authority allocation strategy based on driving authority real-time allocation domain. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2021;23(7):8528–8543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Cao H, Song X. et al. Shared control driver assistance system based on driving intention and situation assessment. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2018;14(11):4982–4994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Wang Y. Shared steering control for human–machine co-driving system with multiple factors. Appl Math Model. 2021;100:471–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Lv C, Hang P. et al. Human machine adaptive shared control for safe driving under automation degradation. IEEE Intell Transp Syst Mag. 2021;14(2):53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Song X, Cao H. et al. Shared control with a novel dynamic authority allocation strategy based on game theory and driving safety field. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2019;124:199–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Oyler DW, Zhang M. et al. Game theoretic modeling of driver and vehicle interactions for verification and validation of autonomous vehicle control systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2017;26(5):1782–1797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albaba BM, Yildiz Y. Driver modeling through deep reinforcement learning and behavioral game theory. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2021;30(2):885–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang K, Rakha HA. Modeling driver merging behavior: A repeated game theoretical approach. Transp Res Rec. 2018;2672(20):144–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Hang P, Huang C, etal. Human-like interactive behavior generation for autonomous vehicles: A bayesian game-theoretic approach with turing test. Advanced Intelligent Systems. 2022;4(5):Article ID: 2100211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hang P, Lv C, Xing Y. et al. Human-like decision making for autonomous driving: A noncooperative game theoretic approach. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2020;22(4):2076–2087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hang P, Lv C, Huang C. et al. An integrated framework of decision making and motion planning for autonomous vehicles considering social behaviors. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2020;69(12). Article ID: 14458–14469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Tseng HE, Langari R. A human-like game theory-based controller for automatic lane changing. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2018;88:140–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo W, Cao H, Zhao S. et al. Optimal design of a driver assistance controller based on surrounding vehicle's social behavior game model. Appl Math Model. 2023;114:646–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Wang L, Zhang C. et al. Social interactions for autonomous driving: A review and perspectives. Found Trends® Robot. 2022;10(3-4):198–376.
   Google Scholar
• Xu C, Zhao W, Li L. et al. A nash q-learning based motion decision algorithm with considering interaction to traffic participants. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2020;69(11). Article ID: 12621–12634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankar GS, Han K. Adaptive robust game-theoretic decision making strategy for autonomous vehicles in highway. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2020;69(12). Article ID: 14484–14493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best MC. Real-time characterisation of driver steering behaviour. Veh Syst Dyn. 2019;57(1):64–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezić I. Analysis of fluid flows via spectral properties of the Koopman operator. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2013;45:357–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao H, Zhao S, Song X. et al. An optimal hierarchical framework of the trajectory following by convex optimisation for highly automated driving vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2019;57(9):1287–1317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao H, Song X, Zhao S. et al. An optimal model-based trajectory following architecture synthesising the lateral adaptive preview strategy and longitudinal velocity planning for highly automated vehicle. Veh Sys Dyn. 2017;55(8):1143–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Q, Ding R, Wu X. et al. A new strategy for rear-end collision avoidance via autonomous steering and differential braking in highway driving. Vehicle system dynamics. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Williams MO, Kevrekidis IG, Rowley CW. A data–driven approximation of the Koopman operator: extending dynamic mode decomposition. J Nonlinear Sci. 2015;25(6):1307–1346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo W, Cao H, Zhao S. et al. A data-driven model-based shared control strategy considering drivers' adaptive behavior in driver-automation interaction. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automobile Eng. 2022. Article ID: 09544070221104888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wu J, Li Y. The driving safety field based on driver–vehicle–road interactions. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2015;16(4):2203–2214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole D, Pick A, Odhams A. Predictive and linear quadratic methods for potential application to modelling driver steering control. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44(3):259–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida H, Shinohara S, Nagai M. Lane change steering manoeuvre using model predictive control theory. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008;46(S1):669–681.
   Google Scholar
• Kolekar S, Petermeijer B, Boer E. et al. A risk field-based metric correlates with driver's perceived risk in manual and automated driving: A test-track study. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2021;133. Article ID: 103428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, He R, Wang J. How do drivers respond to driving risk during car-following? risk-response driver model and its application in human-like longitudinal control. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;148. Article ID: 105783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasekhipour Y, Khajepour A, Chen SK. et al. A potential field-based model predictive path-planning controller for autonomous road vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2016;18(5):1255–1267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na X, Cole DJ. Linear quadratic game and non-cooperative predictive methods for potential application to modelling driver–afs interactive steering control. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(2):165–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na X, Cole DJ. Game-theoretic modeling of the steering interaction between a human driver and a vehicle collision avoidance controller. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst. 2014;45(1):25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakasugi T. A study on warning timing for lane change decision aid systems based on driver's lane change maneuver. In: Proceedings 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Paper; 2005. p. 05–0290.
   Google Scholar
• Wun Chai Y, Abe Y, Kano Y. A study on adaptation of sbw parameters to individual driver's steer characteristics for improved driver–vehicle system performance. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44(sup1):874–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnelle S, Wang J, Su HJ. et al. A personalizable driver steering model capable of predicting driver behaviors in vehicle collision avoidance maneuvers. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst. 2016;47(5):625–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnelle S, Wang J, Su H. et al. A driver steering model with personalized desired path generation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2016;47(1):111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Lu B, Li J. et al. Risk assessment and mitigation in local path planning for autonomous vehicles with lstm based predictive model. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2021;19(4):2738–2749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song X, Cao H, Huang J. Vehicle path planning in various driving situations based on the elastic band theory for highway collision avoidance. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automobile Eng. 2013;227(12):1706–1722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar