An exploration of the super-critical speed dynamic behaviours of the pantograph-catenary system

References

• Bruni S, Bucca G, Carnevale M, et al. Pantograph–catenary interaction: recent achievements and future research challenges. Int J Rail Transp. 2018;6:57–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Ambrosio J, Carnicero A, et al. The results of the pantograph-catenary interaction benchmark. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53:412–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Mei G, Lu L. An improved full Fourier series method approaching the stitched catenary in high-speed railway. Int J Rail Transp. 2022:1–27. doi: 10.1080/23248378.2022.2129492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CJ, Zhang WH, Zhang J, et al. Static form-finding analysis of a railway catenary using a dynamic equilibrium method based on flexible multibody system formulation with absolute nodal coordinates and controls. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2017;39(3):221–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tur M, García E, Baeza L, et al. A 3D absolute nodal coordinate finite element model to compute the initial configuration of a railway catenary. Eng Struct. 2014;71:234–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daocharoenporn S, Mongkolwongrojn M, Kulkarni S, et al. Pantograph/catenary wear using multibody system dynamic algorithms. ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2020;83587:V001T01A002.
   Google Scholar
• Daocharoenporn S, Mongkolwongrojn M, Kulkarni S, et al. Prediction of the pantograph/catenary wear using nonlinear multibody system dynamic algorithms. J Tribol. 2019;141(5):051603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Cho Y, Chung J. Dynamic contact analysis of a tensioned beam with a moving mass-spring system. J Sound Vib. 2012;331:2520–2531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasio D, Fasana A, Garibaldi L, et al. Analytical investigation of railway overhead contact wire dynamics and comparison with experimental results. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2019;116:277–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil J, Gregori S, Tur M, et al. Analytical model of the pantograph–catenary dynamic interaction and comparison with numerical simulations. Veh Syst Dyn. 2022;60(1):132–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, DasGupta A, Chakraborty G. Dynamic interaction between multiple pantographs sliding on an overhead conductor wire: a multibody and wave-based approach. Arch Appl Mech. 2022;92:45–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metrikine AV, Bosch AL. Dynamic response of a two-level catenary to a moving load. J Sound Vib. 2006;292:676–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilk A, Gelman L, Judek S, et al. Novel method of estimation of inertial and dissipative parameters of a railway pantograph model. Veh Syst Dyn. 2022;60:2413–2435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori S, Tur M, Tarancón JE, et al. Stochastic Monte Carlo simulations of the pantograph–catenary dynamic interaction to allow for uncertainties introduced during catenary installation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2019;57(4):471–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Mei G, Lu L. Analysis of the pantograph's mass distribution affecting the contact quality in high-speed railway. Int J RAIL Transp. 2023;11(4):529–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song D, Jiang Y, Zhang W. Dynamic performance of a pantograph–catenary system with consideration of the contact surface. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2018;232:262–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou D, Zhou N, Rui Ping L, et al. Experimental and simulation study of wave motion upon railway overhead wire systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2017;231(8):934–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo Van O, Massat JP, Balmes E. Waves, modes and properties with a major impact on dynamic pantograph-catenary interaction. J Sound Vib. 2017;402:51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Antunes P, Pombo J, et al. A methodology to study high-speed pantograph-catenary interaction with realistic contact wire irregularities. Mech Mach Theory. 2020;152:103940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Rønnquist A, Jiang T, et al. Identification of short-wavelength contact wire irregularities in electrified railway pantograph–catenary system. Mech Mach Theory. 2021;162:104338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Zou D, Zhou N, et al. A study on the mechanism of vehicle body vibration affecting the dynamic interaction in the pantograph–catenary system. Veh Syst Dyn. 2021;59(9):1335–1354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Wang Z, Liu Z, et al. A spatial coupling model to study dynamic performance of pantograph-catenary with vehicle-track excitation. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2021;151:107336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu M, Fujii Y. Improvement of structure of contact wire on overlap sections of Shinkansen[J]. Q Rep RTRI. 2000;41(4):159–162.
   Google Scholar
• Mei G, Zhang W, Zhao H, et al. A hybrid method to simulate the interaction of pantograph and catenary on overlap span. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44(sup1):571–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori S, Gil J, Tur M, et al. Analysis of the overlap section in a high-speed railway catenary by means of numerical simulations. Eng Struct. 2020;221:110963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Yang Z, Wang J, et al. Analysis of contact force and uplift of pantograph–catenary system in overlap section based on numerical simulations and experimental tests. Veh Syst Dyn. 2023;61(10):2492–2515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Rønnquist A, Jiang T, et al. Railway pantograph-catenary interaction performance in an overlap section: Modelling, validation and analysis[J]. J Sound Vib. 2023;548:117506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antunes P, Ambrósio J, Pombo J, et al. A new methodology to study the pantograph–catenary dynamics in curved railway tracks. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020;58:425–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrósio J, Antunes P, Pombo J, et al. Pantograph-catenary interaction in curved railway tracks. Advances in Engineering Materials, Structures and Systems: Innovations, Mechanics and Applications. CRC Press; 2019. p. 1791–1798.
   Google Scholar
• Li R, Zhang W, Ning Z, et al. Influence of a high-speed train passing through a tunnel on pantograph aerodynamics and pantograph-catenary interaction. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2017;231(2):198–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Zhang M, Øiseth O, et al. Wind deflection analysis of railway catenary under crosswind based on nonlinear finite element model and wind tunnel test. Mech Mach Theory. 2022;168:104608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Liu Z, Wang H, et al. Analysis of the galloping behaviour of an electrified railway overhead contact line using the non-linear finite element method. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2018;232(10):2339–2352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Jönsson PA, Stichel S, et al. On the implementation of an auxiliary pantograph for speed increase on existing lines. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54:1077–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Zhang SY, Jiang JZ, et al. Enhancing pantograph-catenary dynamic performance using an inertance-integrated damping system. Veh Syst Dyn. 2022;60:1909–1932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Rebollo C, Jimenez-Octavio JR, Carnicero A. Active control strategy on a catenary-pantograph validated model. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(4):554–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamato G, Chiaradia D, Solazzi M, et al. Detecting early damages in the railway pantograph mechanism: a multiple excitation approach for the frequency domain[J]. Veh Syst Dyn. 2023:1–22. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2023.2242529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho CJ, Park Y. New monitoring technologies for overhead contact line at 400 km·h−1. Engineering. 2016;2:360–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Park TW, Oh HK, et al. Analysis of dynamic interaction between catenary and pantograph with experimental verification and performance evaluation in new high-speed line. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53:1117–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon SY, Cho YH, Lee K, et al. Simulation and testing of the effect of current collection performance according to Pre-sag in 400 km/h Overhead Contact Lines. J Korean Soc Railw. 2016;19(3):288–296.
   Google Scholar
• Cho YH, Park Y, Jung HJ. Implementation technique of real-time monitoring system for high-speed rail contact wire with high tension. Trans Korean Inst Electr Eng. 2015;64(8):1256–1261.
   Google Scholar
• Mei G, Wang J, Zhao C, et al. Research on aerodynamic experiment and dynamic performance of new developed V500 pantograph at 400 km/h or higher. Dyn Veh Roads Tracks - Proc 24th Symp Int Assoc Veh Syst Dyn IAVSD 2015. 2016;919–926.
   Google Scholar
• Song Y, Duan F, Liu Z. Analysis of critical speed for high-speed railway pantograph-catenary system. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2022;71:3547–3555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Chakraborty G, DasGupta A. Coupled dynamics of a viscoelastically supported infinite string and a number of discrete mechanical systems moving with uniform speed. J Sound Vib. 2018;415:184–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 50318: Railway applications - Current collection systems - Validation of simulation of the dynamic interaction between pantograph and overhead contact line. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kia SH, Bartolini F, Mpanda-Mabwe A, et al. Pantograph-catenary interaction model comparison. IECON 2010-36th annual conference on IEEE industrial electronics society. IEEE; 2010. p. 1584–1589.
   Google Scholar
• EN 50367: Railway applications - Current collection systems - Technical criteria for the interaction between pantograph and overhead line; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mei G, Wang J, Zhao C, et al. Research on aerodynamic experiment and dynamic performance of new developed V500 pantograph at 400 km/h or higher. Dyn Veh Roads Tracks - Proc 24th Symp Int Assoc Veh Syst Dyn IAVSD 2015; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• EN 50119: Railway applications -Fixed installations - Electric traction overhead contact lines; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kiessling F, Rainer P, Schmieder A, et al. Contact lines for electric railways: planning, design, implementation, maintenance. Third edition. Paris: Publicis; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• EN 50149: Railway applications — Fixed installations — Electric traction — Copper and copper alloy grooved contact wires; 2001.
   Google Scholar