Output-only estimation of lateral wheel-rail contact forces and track irregularities

References

• Strano S, Terzo M. Review on model-based methods for on-board condition monitoring in railway vehicle dynamics. Adv Mech Eng. 2019;11(2):1687814019826795.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Goodall R, Mei TX, et al. Control and monitoring for railway vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 2007;45(7–8):743–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Luo S, Cole C, et al. An overview: modern techniques for railway vehicle on-board health monitoring systems. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(7):1045–1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg VK, Dukkipati RV. Dynamics of railway vehicle systems. Don Millis (ON): Academic Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Weston PF, Ling CS, Goodman CJ, et al. Monitoring lateral track irregularity from in-service railway vehicles. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2007;221(1):89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston P, Roberts C, Yeo G, et al. Perspectives on railway track geometry condition monitoring from in-service railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53(7):1063–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsunashima H, Naganuma Y, Matsumoto A, et al. Japanese railway condition monitoring of tracks using in-service vehicle. In 5th IET Conference on Railway Condition Monitoring and Non-destructive Testing (RCM 2011). IET; 2011, November. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Wei X, Liu F, Jia L. Urban rail track condition monitoring based on in-service vehicle acceleration measurements. Measurement. 2016;80:217–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalona JL. Vertical track geometry monitoring using inertial sensors and complementary filters. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2016, August. Vol. 50183, p. V006T09A034.
   Google Scholar
• Li P, Goodall R, Weston P, et al. Estimation of railway vehicle suspension parameters for condition monitoring. Control Eng Pract. 2007;15(1):43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfi S, Bruni S. Estimation of long wavelength track irregularities from on board measurement. In 2008 4th IET International Conference on Railway Condition Monitoring. IET; 2008, June. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Azam SE, Chatzi E, Papadimitriou C. A dual Kalman Filter approach for state estimation via output-only acceleration measurements. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2015;60:866–886.
   Google Scholar
• Wiberg J, Karoumi R. Monitoring dynamic behaviour of a long-span railway bridge. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2009;5(5):419–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Real J, Salvador P, Montalbán L, et al. Determination of rail vertical profile through inertial methods. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2011;225(1):14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Simon D. Optimal state estimation: Kalman, H infinity, and nonlinear approaches. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Xu B, Guan X, Zhou H, et al. Rail CM: lateral contact forces estimation of locomotive wheelsets using a model-based filter for condition monitoring. Insight, Non-Destr Test Cond Monit. 2013;55(11):614–620.
   Google Scholar
• Strano S, Terzo M. On the real-time estimation of the wheel-rail contact force by means of a new nonlinear estimator design model. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2018;105:391–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odashima M, Azami S, Naganuma Y, et al. Track geometry estimation of a conventional railway from car-body acceleration measurement. Mech Eng J. 2017;4(1):16–00498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsunashima H, Naganuma Y, Kobayashi T. Track geometry estimation from car-body vibration. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(sup1):207–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwnicki S. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics. Boca Raton: CRC press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• UIC Code 518. Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behaviour—safety—track fatigue—running behaviour; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser I, Strano S, Terzo M, et al. Estimation of the railway equivalent conicity under different contact adhesion levels and with no wheelset sensorization. Veh Syst Dyn. 2023;61(1):19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz S, Ros J, Urda P, et al. Estimation of lateral track irregularity through Kalman filtering techniques. IEEE Access. 2021;9:60010–60025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Li C, Luo Z, et al. Identification of track irregularities with the multi-sensor acceleration measurements of vehicle dynamic responses. Veh Syst Dyn. 2023: 1–26. doi:10.1080/00423114.2023.2200193.
   Google Scholar
• De Rosa A, Kulkarni R, Qazizadeh A, et al. Monitoring of lateral and cross level track geometry irregularities through onboard vehicle dynamics measurements using machine learning classification algorithms. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2021;235(1):107–120.
   Google Scholar
• Gadhave R, Vyas NS. Rail-wheel contact forces and track irregularity estimation from on-board accelerometer data. Veh Syst Dyn. 2022;60(6):2145–2166.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser I, Strano S, Terzo M, et al. Anti-yaw damping monitoring of railway secondary suspension through a nonlinear constrained approach integrated with a randomly variable wheel-rail interaction. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2021;146:107040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong LH, Gong XL, Xuan SH, et al. Semi-active H∞ control of high-speed railway vehicle suspension with magnetorheological dampers. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(5):600–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Merwe R. Sigma-point Kalman Filters for probabilistic inference in dynamic state-space models. Beaverton: Oregon Health & Science University; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wan EA, van der Merwe R. Kalman Filtering and neural networks. New York: Wiley; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Simulia. Multi-body simulation software; 2019. Available from: https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/training/course-descriptions/simpack-rail/
   Google Scholar
• Ito K, Xiong K. Gaussian Filters for nonlinear filtering problems. IEEE Trans Autom Control. May 2000;45(5):910–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandelli E, Lomiento G, Quaglini V, et al. Estimation of the instantaneous friction coefficients of sliding isolators subjected to bi-directional orbits through a nonlinear state observer. Eng Struct. 2021;249:113374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser I, Strano S, Terzo M, et al. Railway anti-yaw suspension monitoring through a nonlinear constrained estimator. Int J Mech Control. December 2021;22(02):35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sangwan V, Kumar R, Rathore AK. State-of-charge estimation for li-ion battery using extended Kalman Filter (EKF) and central difference Kalman Filter (CDKF). In 2017 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting. IEEE; 2017. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre T, Bruyninckx H, De Schutter J. Comment on ‘A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators’. IEEE Trans Autom Control. Aug 2002;47(8):1406–1409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgaard M, Poulsen N, Ravn O. New developments in state estimation for nonlinear systems. Automatica. 2000;36(11):1627–1638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørgaard M, Poulsen N, Ravn O. Advances in derivative-free state estimation for nonlinear systems. Technical Report IMM-REP-1998-15, Dept. of Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, 28 Lyngby, Denmark, April 2000.
   Google Scholar
• van der Merwe R, Wan E. Efficient derivative-free Kalman Filters for online learning. In Proceedings of the ESANN, Bruges, April 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser I, Poll G, Voss G, et al. The impact of structural flexibilities of wheelsets and rails on the hunting behaviour of a railway vehicle. Veh Syst Dyn. 2019;57(4):564–594. doi:10.1080/00423114.2018.1484933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Railway Research Institute. ERRI B 176/DT 290, B 176 / 3 benchmark problem – results and assessment, Utrecht; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Iwnicki S. Manchester benchmarks for rail vehicle simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 1998;30(3–4):295–313. doi:10.1080/00423119808969454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard PD, Ward C, Dixon R, et al. Models for estimation of creep forces in the wheel/rail contact under varying adhesion levels. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(sup1):370–386. doi:10.1080/00423114.2014.901541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meymand SZ, Keylin A, Ahmadian M. A survey of wheel–rail contact models for rail vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(3):386–428. doi:10.1080/00423114.2015.1137956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoljic-Beglerovic S, Stettinger G, Luber B, et al. Railway suspension system fault diagnosis using cubature Kalman Filter techniques. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2018;51(24):1330–1335. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.562
   Google Scholar
• Bosso N, Zampieri N. Numerical stability of co-simulation approaches to evaluate wheel profile evolution due to wear. Int J Rail Transport. 2020;8(2):159–179. doi:10.1080/23248378.2019.1672588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Vinolas J, Berg M, et al. Modelling of suspension components in a rail vehicle dynamics context. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011;49(7):1021–1072. doi:10.1080/00423114.2011.586430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skerman D, Cole C, Spiryagin M. The effect of the wavelength of lateral track geometry irregularities on the response measurable by an instrumented freight wagon. Veh Syst Dyn. 2023: 1–23. doi:10.1080/00423114.2023.2183871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despotovic M, Nedic V, Despotovic D, et al. Evaluation of empirical models for predicting monthly mean horizontal diffuse solar radiation. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2016;56:246–260. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar