A fast solution method for the interaction between the rigid overhead contact system and pantograph on long railway lines

References

• Song Y, Antunes P, Pombo J, et al. A methodology to study high-speed pantograph-catenary interaction with realistic contact wire irregularities. Mech Mach Theory. 2020;152:103940. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.103940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei G. Tribological performance of rigid overhead lines against pantograph sliders under DC passage. Tribol Int. 2020;151:106538. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Bucca G, Carnevale M, et al. Pantograph–catenary interaction: recent achievements and future research challenges. Int J Rail Transp. 2018;6(2):57–82. doi:10.1080/23248378.2017.1400156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho YH, Lee K, Park Y, et al. Influence of contact wire pre-sag on the dynamics of pantograph–railway catenary. Int J Mech Sci. 2010;1471–1490. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesali F, Rezvani MA, Molatefi H. Simulation of the dynamic interaction of rail vehicle pantograph and catenary through a modal approach. Arch Appl Mech. 2020;1475–1496. doi:10.1007/s00419-020-01679-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni S, Pappalardo CM, Shabana AA. Pantograph/catenary contact formulations. J Vib Acoust. 2017;139(1):011010. doi:10.1115/1.4035132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo JH, Sugiyama H, Shabana AA. Three-dimensional large deformation analysis of the multibody pantograph/catenary systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 2005;42:199–215. doi:10.1007/s11071-005-2789-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Mei G, Lu L. An improved full Fourier series method approaching the stitched catenary in high-speed railway. Int J Rail Transp. 2024;12(1):153–179. doi:10.1080/23248378.2022.2129492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Wang Z, Liu Z, et al. A spatial coupling model to study dynamic performance of pantograph-catenary with vehicle-track excitation. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2021;151:107336. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Q, Mei G, Chen G, et al. Dynamic response of the axle-box bearing of a high-speed train excited by wheel flat. Veh Syst Dyn. 2023;1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bautista A, Montesinos J, Pintado P. Dynamic interaction between pantograph and rigid overhead lines using a coupled FEM — multibody procedure. Mech Mach Theory. 2016;97:100–111. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2015.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simarro M, Postigo S, Cabrera JA, et al. A procedure for validating rigid catenary models using evolutionary techniques. Comput Struct. 2020;228:106145. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.106145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dios Sanz J, Calvo Á, Barbado D. Analysis of the capability of non-specific simulation software for studying the dynamic interaction between pantograph and rigid overhead conductor rail. Transp Res Proc. 2018;33:187–194. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.091
   Google Scholar
• Song Y, Liu Z, Xu Z, et al. Developed moving mesh method for high-speed railway pantograph-catenary interaction based on nonlinear finite element procedure. Int J Rail Transp. 2019;7(3):173–190. doi:10.1080/23248378.2018.1532330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori S, Tur M, Nadal E, et al. Fast simulation of the pantograph–catenary dynamic interaction. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2017;129:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.finel.2017.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil J, Tur M, Gregori S, et al. Finite element periodic catenary model to perform HIL pantograph tests considering non-linear dropper behaviour. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2022;210:103816. doi:10.1016/j.finel.2022.103816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Shen Z, Zeng J. Study on dynamics of coupled systems in high-speed trains. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(7):966–1016. doi:10.1080/00423114.2013.798421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song S, Zhang W, Han P, et al. Sliding window method for vehicles moving on a long track. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56(1):113–127. doi:10.1080/00423114.2017.1346262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Yang CJ, Zhu WD, et al. A reduced-plate model transmission method for fast dynamic analysis of vehicle–pavement interaction. J Sound Vib. 2023;548:117554. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2023.117554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou D, Zhou N, Li RP, et al. Experimental and simulation study of wave motion upon railway overhead wire systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2017;231(8):934–944. doi:10.1177/0954409716648718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan H, Dixon R, Stewart E. A disturbance observer based lumped-mass catenary model for active pantograph design and validation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2023;61(6):1565–1582. doi:10.1080/00423114.2022.2085586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 50317:2012, The European Standard, Railway applications - Current collection systems - Requirements for and validation of measurements of the dynamic interaction between pantograph and overhead contact line;2012.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott CJ, Matsuura K. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim Res. 2005;30(1):79–82. doi:10.3354/cr030079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar