- Hirt's reconstructed IE *dékmt is not at all necessary. The Germanic form is dealt with in the following pages. Armenian ewt'n ‘7’ and tasn ‘10’ accord perfectly with the assumption that (*-ṃ>) *-n>*-an>-n (by post-tonic syncope) in Armenian. IE *dḱmtóm is adequately split *dḱm-tóm; all forms in *-t- are easily explained as old suffixial forms, frequently reshaped in detail of stem-type. If Hirt were right it is strange we get Skt. dàça, and not *dàçat; from the pattern of Skt. finals it is far easier to explain forms like daç´t as suffixial than to allege loss in the case of dàça; çat proves nothing—shifting of stem-type is common in the Indie numerals, loss of a final unclustered t hard to believe. Besides, if we regard the t-forms as suffixial, we have the characteristic numeral suffix *-ṃ, whatever significance this may once have had; it is noteworthy that the only number to break the series, ‘8’ (*oḱtó:u, or *HoḱtóHw, cf. ‘20’ below), is a striking dual, an exact multiple of the highest inflected number and therefore not just a haphazard break in the series. Also, if we deprive ourselves of the final *-ṃ here, there is no good source for the analogy *newn > *newm, if that actually was the case. The suffixial *-ṃ is further supported by the forms from *deḱu- (cf. Goth, -tigu-), thus giving a very old-layer base *deḱ-; it is conceivable that here we may have a very ancient case of heteroclysis in *-m parallel to *-n, *-r, *-l, *-y. If the form was *dékmt it is further strange that, in light of the frequent ordinal and derivative suffixes in *-t-, we have no forms showing reflexes of IE */tt/ [tst].
- Incidentally, I write *dḱmtóm above to explain the series *semdḱmtóm>*sed´mtóm > *sekmtóm>ἑ𝛞ατóυ. The cluster posited gets rid of the first *m, which otherwise ought to give *ἑ𝛄кαóυ. The treatment *dḱ>k is paralleled in f(e)íкατι: Lat. vīginti (with assimilatory voicing and compensatory lengthening) < *Hwi-dḱm-ti (or *Hwy-dḱm-tý(:)). The laryngeal is attested by Tocharian B ікə𝛑 (<*yікə𝛑) beside Toch A. wiki, and shows up in the length of the diphthong of the nominative dual, as exemplified in ‘8’ above.
- Variant forms must be assumed for ‘4’ at some time or other in view of the West Gmc. forms (e.g. OE fēower, OHG fior), which ostensibly show *3, against, e.g., Go .fidwor, which shows what we should expect from other IE evidence.
Full access
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.