- The Indo-Hillite Laryngeal, Baltimore 1912, pp. 87–89.
- Among others, W. P. Lehmann in Proto-Indo-European Phonology, Austin 1952, pp. 36–52.
- BSL 51 (1955).
- Cf. T. Burrow, The Sanskrit Language, London, p. 196.
- Cf. Non-apophonic O-Vocalism in Indo-European, Word 9 (1953). 253–267, and Economie des changements phonétiques, Berne 1955, pp. 212–234.
- In -k- forms where that consonant is preceded by a long vowel, one should reckon with analogical extension of the long quantity from oblique cases.
- One could, of course, reckon with the possibility of an s mobile absent in the Celtic forms: Lith. blývas « purple » and cognates should also somehow be brought into the picture.
- From the -k- form attested in Greek, a Proto-Slavic * sorkā could easily be derived through « feminine thematization «. The Slavic word designates the magpie.
- Cf. Economie des changements phonétiques, p. 224.
- Ibid., p. 225.
- Ibid., pp. 232–233.
- Choose new content alerts to be informed about new research of interest to you
- Easy remote access to your institution's subscriptions on any device, from any location
- Save your searches and schedule alerts to send you new results
- Export your search results into a .csv file to support your research