Popular song and popular grammar, poetry and metalanguage

REFERENCES

• Abrahams, Roger. 1971. “Introductory remarks to a rhetorical theory of folklore” Journal of American Folklore, 81: 143–58.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Catherine J. 1984. “Time in Quechua narrative” manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, Henning. 1973. “Abductive and deductive change,” Language, 49: 765–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, Henning. 1975. “Toward a typology of change: bifurcating changes and binary relations” in J. M. Anderson and C. Jones, Eds., Historical linguistics II: Theory and description in phonology. Amsterdam: North Holland. Pp. 17–60.
   Google Scholar
• Arguedas, José María. 1938. “Simbolismo y poesia de dos canciones populares quechuas” La Prensa (Buenos Aires) 23 October and 27 November. Reprinted in Angel Rama Ed. José María Arguedas, Señores e indios, Acerca de la cultura quechua, 1976. Buenos Aires: Arca and Calicanto. Pp. 186–90.
   Google Scholar
• Arguedas, José María. 1949. Canciones y cuentos del pueblo quechua. Lima: Huascarán.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Richard. 1975. “Verbal art as performance” American anthropologist, 77: 290–311.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Richard. 1977. “Linguistics, anthropology, and verbal art: Toward a unified perspective, with a special discussion of children's folklore” in Muriel Saville-Troike Ed., Linguistics and anthropology, Washington: Georgetown University Press. Pp. 13–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jonathan. 1976. Linguistic behaviour. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benveniste, Emil. 1939. “Nature du signe linguistique” Acta linguistica hafniensia, 1: 23–9.
   Google Scholar
• Boas, Franz. 1911. “Introduction” Handbook of American Indian languages, vol. 1, Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 40: 1–83.
   Google Scholar
• Boas, Franz. 1938. “Language” in General anthropology. Boston: Heath. Pp. 124–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1982. Ce que parler veut dire. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, Jerome S. 1983. Child's talk. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Burling, Robbins. 1969. “Cognition and componential analysis: God's truth or hocus-pocus,” in Stephen Tyler Ed., Cognitive anthropology. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. Pp. 419–28. (Originally published in: American anthropologist, 66: 20–28.)
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1980. Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cusihuamán Gutiérrez, Antonio. 1976. Gramática quechua: Cuzco-Collao, Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
   Google Scholar
• D'Andrade, Roy G. 1984. “Cultural meaning systems” in Richard Schwederand Robert A. LeVine Eds., Culture theory, Essays on mind, self and emotion. Cambridge: University Press. Pp. 88–118.
   Google Scholar
• Derwing, Bruce. 1973. Transformational grammar as a theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowty, David R. 1980. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Emeneau, M. B. 1966. “Style and meaning in an oral literature,” Language, 42: 323–45.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, James J. 1975. “On binary categories and primary symbols” in Roy Willis Ed., The interpretation of symbolism. London: Malaby. Pp. 99–132.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, Paul. 1979a. “The symbol and its relative non-arbitrariness,” Language, context, and the imagination. Stanford: University Press. 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, Paul. 1979b. “Poetic language and the imagination,” Language, context, and the imagination. Stanford: University Press. 441–512.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, Paul. 1986. “Linguistic relativism and poetic indeterminacy: A reformulation of Sapir's position,” The language parallax. Austin: University of Texas Press. 16–53.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Art as a cultural system,” Local knowledge. New York: Basic. Pp. 94–120.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1981. “Replies and responses,” Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Pp. 5–77. (Originally published 1976, in Language in Society, 5: 257–313.)
   Google Scholar
• Gonçález Holguín, Diego de. 1608. Vocabulario de la lengua general de todo el Perú llamada qquichua o del Inca, Los Reyes (Lima): Antonio Ricardo. (Facsimile reprint (1952), Lima: Universidad Nacional de San Marcos.)
   Google Scholar
• Gossen, Gary. 1974. Chamulas in the world of the sun. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. “Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements,” in Universals of language. Cambridge: MIT Press. Pp. 73–113.
   Google Scholar
• Hankamer, Jorge. 1977. “Multiple analyses,” in Charles N. Li Ed., Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press. Pp. 583–607.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Susan F. 1986. “Convicted by the Holy Spirit: The rhetoric of fundamental Baptist conversion.” Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Regina. 1983. “José María Arguedas: El sustrato quechua,” Revista Iberoamericana, 122: 111–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, Norbert and David Lightfoot. 1981. “Introduction,” in N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot Eds., Explanation in linguistics. London: Longman. Pp. 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, Dell. 1964. “Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication” in John Gumperz and Dell Hymes Eds., The ethnography of communication. American Anthropologist, 66 (6, part 2): 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, Ivan. 1981. Shadow work. Boston: Marion Boyars.
   Google Scholar
• Isbell, Billie Jean, (nd.) “Andean gender as process” in An Andean kaleidoscope: The dynamics of interpretation, (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Isbell, Billie Jean and Fredy Amilcar-Roncalla. 1977. “The ontogenesis of metaphor.” Journal of Latin American Lore, 3: 19–49.
   Google Scholar
• Isbell, Billie Jean, Edward Franquemont, and Christine Franquemont. 1983. “The unfolding of symmetries: The structure of Andean cloth.” Unpublished paper presented to Wenner-Gren Symposium number 93: Cloth and the organization of human experience.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1941. Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala. English translation by A. R. Keiler, 1968, Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Linguistics and poetics” in Thomas A. Sebeok Ed., Style in language’. Cambridge: MIT Press. Pp. 350–77.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1980. “Metalanguage as a linguistic problem,” The framework of language. Ann Arbor: Michigan Studies in the Humanities. Pp. 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kroeber, Alfred L. 1917. “The superorganic.” American anthropologist, 19: 163–213.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, William A. 1970. “The study of language in its social context,” Studium generale, 23: 30–87, reprinted in Sociolinguistic patterns, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Pp. 183–259.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, William A. 1972. “The social setting of linguistic change.” Current trends in linguistics. 11: 196–251, reprinted in Sociolinguistic patterns, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Pp. 260–325.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Adrienne. 1975. “Talking about wine,” Language, 51: 901–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Adrienne. 1983. Wine and conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, Bruce. 1984. “Una nación acorralada: Southern Peruvian Quechua language planning and politics in historical perspective,” Language in Society, 13(3):291–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannheim, Bruce. 1985. “Southern Peruvian Quechua” in Harriet E. Manelis Klein and Louisa A. Stark Eds., South American indian languages, retrospect and prospect. Austin: University of Texas Press. Pp. 481–515.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, Bruce. 1986a. “Semantic coupling in Quechua verse.” Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, Bruce. 1986b. “Couplets and oblique contexts: The social organization of a folksong,” in Barbara Johnstone Ed., Perspectives on repetition (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, Bruce. nd. “The margins of intelligibility,” in Billie Jean Isbell Ed., An Andean kaleidoscope: The dynamics of interpretation (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• McCawley, James D. 1982. “The nonexistence of syntactic categories.” Thirty million theories of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 176–203.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1985. “It's just a question of semantics,” manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, John. 1976. “Riddling and enculturation: A glance at the cerebral child,” Sociolinguistic Working Paper 36. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Meillet, Antoine. 1905. “Comment les mots changent des sens.” Année Sociologique, 9: 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Stephen. 1985. Traditional Chinese poetry and poetics, Omen of the world. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Gary J. 1969. Ayacucho Quechua grammar and dictionary. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Partee, Barbara. 1980. “Montague grammar, mental representations, and reality” in Stig Kanger and Sven Öhmann Eds. Philosophy and grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pp. 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Partee, Barbara. 1982. “Belief sentences and the limits of semantics,” in Stanley Peters and Esa Saarinen Eds., Processes, beliefs, and questions. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pp. 87–106.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1901. “Abduction and induction,” in Justus Buchler Ed., 1940, The philosophy of Peirce. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Pp. 150–54.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Charles Sanders. c. 1902. “Logic as semiotic,” in Justus Buchler Ed., 1940 The philosophy of Peirce. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Pp. 98–115.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. 1975. “The meaning of ‘meaning’,” Mind, language, and reality. Philosophical papers, vol. 2. Cambridge: University Press. Pp. 215–71.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, Michael. 1979. “The conduit metaphor—A case of frame conflict in our language about language,” in Andrew Ortony Ed., Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: University Press. Pp. 284–324.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, I. A. 1936. The philosophy of rhetoric. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul. 1975. La métaphore vive. Paris: Seuil. Translated by Robert Czerny, 1977, The rule of metaphor, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roel P., Josefat. 1959. “El huayno del Cuzco,” Folklore Americano, 6/7: 129–246.
   Google Scholar
• Rosaldo, Michelle Z. 1982. “The things we do with words, Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy,” Language in Society, 11: 203–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanches, Mary and Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett. 1976. “Children's traditional speech play and child language,” in Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett Ed., Speech play. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Pp. 65–110.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, Edward. 1933. “La réalité psychologique des phonèmes,” Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique, 30: 247–65. Translated as “The psychological reality of phonemes,” in D. G. Mandelbaum Ed., 1949, Selected writings of Edward Sapir. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1915. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot (1971 edition).
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, Michael. 1972. “Chinook Jargon: Language contact and the problem of multilevel generative systems,” Language, 48: 596–625.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, Michael. 1979. “Linguistic structure and linguistic ideology,” in Paul R. Clyne et al Eds., The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. Pp. 193–247.
   Google Scholar
• Soto Ruiz, Clodoaldo. 1976. Gramática quechua: Ayacucho-Chanca. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, Dan and Dierdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, Louisa A. 1969. “The lexical structure of Quechua body parts,” Anthropological Linguistics, 11(1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton-Smith, Brian. 1976. “A developmental account of riddles,” in Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Ed. Speech play. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Pp. 111–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, Anthony F. C. 1961. Culture and personality. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Waugh, Linda R. 1982. “Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure,” Semiotica, 38: 299–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. “Grammatical categories,” in John Carroll, Ed. Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge: MIT Press. Pp. 87–101.
   Google Scholar
• Zuidema, R. Tom. 1971. “What are asymmetric alliance systems?” Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar