339
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Reviews

, , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 329-399 | Published online: 16 Jun 2015

REFERENCES

  • Akamatsu, Tsutomu. 1988. The theory of neutralization and the archiphoneme in functional phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Martinet, André. 1949. Phonology as functional phonetics. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Mulder, Jan W.F. 1989. Foundations of axiomatic linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Néve de Mevergnies, François-Xavier. Forthcoming. Review of Peeters (1992). Word.
  • Peeters, Bert. 1992. Diachronie, phonologie, et linguistique fonctionnelle. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.
  • Peeters, Bert. 1994. Review of Mulder (1989). Canadian journal of linguistics, 39:76–80.

REFERENCES

  • Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. (Typological Studies in Language 9). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  • Givón, Talmy. 1971. “Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: an archaeologist's field trip. “ In: Papers from the 7 th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. pp. 394–415.
  • Givón, Talmy. 1991. “Serial verbs and the mental reality of event: Grammatical vs cognitive packaging.” In: Traugott and Heine. Volume 1. pp. 81–127
  • Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Bernd Heine, editors. 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization. Volumes 1 & 2. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.

REFERENCES

  • Cleveland, William L. 1971. The making of an Arab nationalist. Ottomanism and Arabism in the life and thought of Satic al-Husri. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Owens, Jonathan. 1987. The foundation of grammar: An introduction to Medieval Arabic grammatical theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Owens, Jonathan. 1990. Early Arabic grammatical theory: Heterogeneity and standardization. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Patai, Raphael. 1973. The Arab mind. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
  • Versteegh, Kees and Michael G. Carter, Eds. 1990. Studies in the history of Arabic Grammar II. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

REFERENCES

  • Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Carter, Michael. 1973. “An Arabic grammarian of the eighth century A.D.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 93: 146–57.
  • Greenberg, Joseph H. forthcoming. “The logical bases of linguistic prescriptivism: A parallel between classical grammarians and Moslem legal theorists.” Robert Politzer Festschrift.
  • Kaye, Alan S. 1990. “Arabic grammatical theory in the Middle Ages.” Historiographia linguistica 16: 351–60.
  • Owens, Jonathan. 1988. The foundations of grammar: an introduction to medieval Arabic grammatical theory. (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science No. 45). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Weil, G. 1913. Die grammatischen Schulen von Kufa und Basra. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

REFERENCES

  • Arapov, Mikhail V. 1988. Kvantitativnaja lingvistika [Quantitative Linguistics.] Moscow: Nauka.
  • Atamuradov, M. 1966. Rechevaja audiometria na turkmenskom jazyke [Speech Audiometry in the Turkmen Language] Kandidat dissertation. Leningrad: Leningrad State University.
  • Bondarko, L. V., L. R. Zinder, & A. S. Shtern. 1977. “Nekotorye statisticheskie kharakteristiki russkoj rechi” [“Some statistical characteristics of Russian speech”]. In Slukh i rechj v norme i patologii, LVVOG [Leningrad Rehabilitation Centre of the All-Union Society for the Deaf], Leningrad. pp. 3–16.
  • Brainerd, Barron. 1974. Weighing evidence in language and literature: A statistical approach. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Elizarenkova, T. J. 1974. Issledovanija po diahronicheskoj fonologii indoarijskih jazykov [Investigations of the diachronic phonology of Indo-Aryan languages.] Moscow: Nauka.
  • Embleton, Sheila. 1983. “Incorporating borrowing rates in lexicostatistical tree reconstruction”. In Historical linguistics, ed by Barron Brainerd, Bochum, Brockmeyer, pp. 1–24.
  • Embleton, Sheila. 1985. “Lexicostatistics applied to the Germanic, Romance, and Wakashan families”. Word 36:37–60.
  • Embleton, Sheila. 1986. Statistics in Historical linguistics. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
  • Giunashvili, D. S. 1965. Sistema fonem persidskogo jazyka [The system of phonemes of the persian language], Trudy Tbilisskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 116, serija vostok-ovedenija V. pp. 87–141.
  • Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. “Language universals”. In Current trends in linguistics, vol. III, Theoretical foundations, Ed. Thomas Sebeok, Mouton, The Hague, 1966 pp. 61–110.
  • Gridneva, L. M. 1966. “Rozpodil golosnykh, prigolosnykh i propuskiv u suchasnomu ukrain-skomu mobleni” [“The distribution of vowels, consonants, and blanks in Modern Ukrainian Speech”]. In Statistichni ta strukturni lingvistichni modeli [Statistical and structural linguistic models], Naukova Dumka, Kiev. pp. 45–58.
  • Harary, Frank, & Herbert H. Paper. 1957. “Towards a general calculus of phonemic distribution”. Language 33:143–69.
  • Jolkina, V. N., & L. S. Judina. 1964. “Statistika slogov russkoj rechi” [“The statistics of the syllables of Russian speech”]. In Vychisliteljnye sistemy, issue 10, IMSOAN [Institute of Mathematics of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences], Novosibirsk. pp. 58–78.
  • Kissen, I. A. 1964. “Nekotorye dannye o chastotnosti fonem v sovremennom uzbekskom literaturnom jazyke” [“Some data on the frequency of phonemes in the Modern Literary Uzbek language”]. Nauchnye Trudy Tashkentnogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, issue 229, Vostokovedenie. Pp 67–79.
  • Königova, M. 1966. “K voprosu o statisticheskoj vyborke v lingvistike” [“On the question of statistical sampling in linguistics”]. Prague studies in mathematical linguistics 1:113–121. [The same article appears in Czech in Slovo a slovesnost 26:161–68, 1965.]
  • Martynenko, G. J. 1983. “Mnogomernyj sintaktiko-statisticheskij analiz hudozhestvennoj prozy” [“Multi-dimensional syntactico-statistical analysis of fiction”]. In Strukturnaja i prikladnaja linguistika [Structural and applied linguistics], issue 2, Leningrad State University, Leningrad. pp. 58–72.
  • Moinfar, M. D. 1973. Phonologie quantitative du persan. Paris: l'Université de Paris.
  • Perebejnos, V. I. 1964. “Chastota i sochetaemostj fonem sovremennogo ukrainskogo jazyka” [“The frequency and combinability of phonemes of the Modern Ukrainian language”]. Kiev: OZ [Society “Znanie”].
  • Peshchak, M. M. et al, eds. 1979. Morphemic structure of the Word. Kiev: Naukova Dumka.
  • Sankoff, David. 1972. “Reconstructing the history and geography of an evolutionary tree”. American mathematical monthly 79:596–603.
  • Segal, D. M. 1972. O snovy fonologicheskoj statistiki [The fundamentals of phonological statistics], Moscow: Nauka.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1977. “Nekotorye harakteristiki raspredelenija fonem mansijskogo jazyka” [“A few characteristics of the distribution of phonemes in Mansi”]. Sovetskoe finno-ugrove-denie 13:195–198.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1979. “Raspredelenie glasnyh fonem v mansijskoj poezii” [“The distribution of vowel phonemes in Mansi poetry”]. Sovetskoe finno-ugrovedenie 15:164–67.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1980. “Chastotnye harakteristiki glasnyh pervogo sloga mansijskogo jazyka” [“Frequency characteristics of first syllable vowels in Mansi”]. In Zvukovoj stroj sibirskih jazykov [Sound Structure of Siberian Languages], Institut istorii, filologii i filosofii Sibir-skogo otdelenija Akademii nauk SSSR [Institute of History, Philology and Philosophy of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences], Novosibirsk, pp. 72–75.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1981. “Zakonomernosti chastotnogo funktsionirovanija dolgih i kratkih glasnyh v udarnyh i neudarnyh slogah mansijskogo slova” [“Regularity of frequential functioning of long and short vowels in stressed and unstressed syllables in Mansi”]. Sovetskoe finno-ugrovedenie 17:105–109.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1983. “Selected consonantal characteristics of some Finno-Ugric languages from a phonostatistical point of view”. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 45 (1–3): 154–63.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1984a. “Bibliography of works by Yurij Alexeevich Tambovtsev on linguistics and speech recognition”. Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing Bulletin 12:35–36.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1984b. “Phoneme frequency and closeness quotient: Establishing genetic relationship degrees by phonostatistics”. Ural-Altaic Yearbook 56:103–19.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1985a. “Nadjozhnostj podschjota velichiny konsonantnogo koeffitsienta v zavisimosti ot velichiny objoma vyborki” [“The Reliability of Computing of the Value of the Consonantal Coefficient in Correlation to the Size of the Sample”]. In Fonetika sibirskikh jazykov, Institut istorii, filologii i filosofii Sibirskogo otdelenija Akademii nauk SSSR [Institute of History, Philology and Philosophy of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences], Novosibirsk, pp. 94–100.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1985b. “Bibliography of the works of the ‘Statistics of speech’ group in the USSR”. Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing Bulletin 13(2):50–53.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1985c. “Ustojchivostj konsonantnogo koeffitsienta v zavisimosti ot velichiny vyborki v nekotorykh finno-ugorskikh jazykakh” [“The stability of the consonantal coefficient in correlation to the size of the sample in some Finno-Ugric languages”]. In Issledovanie jazykov narodov SSSR, Novosibirsk, NGU [Novosibirsk State University], pp. 110–14.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1985d. “The consonantal coefficient in selected languages”. Canadian journal of linguistics 30(2): 179–88.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1986a. “Further bibliography of the works of the ‘Statistics of speech’ Group in the USSR(1973–1985)”. Literary and linguistic computing 1:230–32.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1986b. “The consonantal quotient as a means to indicate structural differences”. Journal of pragmatics 10:741–48.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1987. “The use of a consonantal coefficient to establish relationships within language families”. In The Australian Universities language and literature association 24th Congress. Abstracts and Proceedings, Christchurch, New Zealand, University of Canterbury, 1987 pp. 83–84.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1988. “The linguistic distances among some languages of Asia”. The study of sound 22 (December): 17–34.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1990a. “Kompaktnostj fmno-ugorskoj semji po dannym konsonantnogo koeffitsienta” [“The compactness of the Finno-Ugric language family according to the data of the consonantal coefficient”]. Linguistica-Uralica 26:13–20.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1990b. “The application of computers in phonetics and linguistics in the USSR. A Report: Part 1”. The Bulletin of the Phonetic Society of Japan 193 (April), pp 22–29.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1991a. “The development of artificial intelligence and linguistics in the USSR”. In Humanities research using computers, Ed. Charles Turk, Chapman & Hall, London, New York (etc.), 1991 pp. 137–162.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1991b. “Selected phonostatistical features of the Hakas language”. Ural-Altaic yearbook 63:155–165.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1992a. “The measurement of the distance between languages within language families based on the value of the consonantal coefficient (part 3)”. The Bulletin of the Phonetic-Society of Japan 199 (April):27–43.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1992b. “Phonostatistical study of the Vepsian language”. The bulletin of the Phonetic Society of Japan 201:9–14.
  • Tambovtsev, Yuri. 1979. “Nekotorye rezultaty fonostatisticheskogo analiza zvukogo sostava jugskogo jazyka” [“Some results of the phonostatistical analysis of the Jug language”]. In Teoreticheskie voprosy fonetiki i grammatiki jazykov narodov SSSR [Theoretical questions of phonetics and grammar of the languages of the peoples of the USSR], Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State University. pp. 47–52.
  • Van den Broeke, M.P.R., A. Aerts, J. Reizevoort, T. Veenhof, J. Lammens, & M. Elstrodt. 1986. “Type- and token-frequencies of wordclasses, phonemes and phoneme pairs in Dutch”. In Progress report, Institute of Phonetics, University of Utrecht, vol. 12, no. 1. pp. 1–15.
  • Vertogradova, V. V. Strukturnaja tipologija sredneindijskih fonologicheskih sistem [Structural Typology of the Middle Indic Phonological System], Moscow: Nauka.

REFERENCES

  • Aoun, J., N. Hornslein, D. Lightfoot, and A. Weinberg. 1987. “Two types of locality.” Linguistic inquiry 18:537–77.
  • Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi. 1986. “Psych-verbs and Th-theory.” Lexicon Project Working Papers 13. Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
  • Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. “Psych-verbs and Theta-Theory.” Natural language and linguistic theory 6:291–352.
  • Bouchard, Denis. 1985. “The binding theory and the notion of accessible SUBJECT.” Linguistic inquiry 16:117–33.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Fois.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
  • Emonds, Joseph E. 1978. “The verbal complex V'-V in French.” Linguistic inquiry 9:151–75.
  • Emonds, Joseph E. 1985. A unified theory of syntactic categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Freidin, Robert and Wayne Harbert. 1983. “On the fine structure of the binding theory: Principle A and reciprocals.” Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting, NELS. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
  • Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
  • Higginbotham, James. 1983. “Logical form, binding, and nominals.” Linguistic inquiry 14: 395–420.
  • Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
  • Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. “On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns.” Linguistic inquiry 15:531–74.
  • Joshi, A.K. 1983. “Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions?” Natural language processing: Psycholinguistic, Computational and theoretical perspectives. Ed. D. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Joshi, A.K., L, Levy, and M. Takahashi. 1975. “Tree adjunct grammars.” Journal of the computer and system sciences 10:136–63.
  • Kayne, Richard. 1983. “Connectedness.” Linguistic inquiry 14:223–49.
  • Koopman, H. 1987. “On the absence of case chains in Bambara.” Ms., UCLA.
  • Kroch, A.S. and A.K. Joshi. 1985. “The linguistic relevance of tree adjoining grammars.” Technical report, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito. 1984. “On the nature of proper government.” Linguistic inquiry 15:235–89.
  • Montalbetti, Mario. 1984. After binding. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
  • Platzack, C. 1983. “Germanic word order and the COMP/INFL parameter.” Working papers in Scandinavian syntax 2. Linguistics Department, University of Trondheim.
  • Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. “Coreference and bound anaphora.” Linguistics and philosophy 6:47–88.
  • Rouveret, A. and J.-R. Vergnaud. 1980. “Specifying reference to the subject: French causatives and conditions on representations.” Linguistic inquiry 11:97–202.
  • Safir, Ken. 1987. “The syntactic projection of lexical thematic structure.” Natural language and linguistic theory 5:561–601.
  • Toman, J., ed. 1984. Studies in German grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
  • Williams, Edwin. 1985. “PRO and subject of NP.” Natural language and linguistic theory 3:297–315.
  • Williams, Edwin. 1987a. “NP trace in theta theory.” Linguistics and philosophy 10:433–47.
  • Williams, Edwin. 1987b. “Implicit arguments, the binding theory and control.” Natural language and linguistic theory 5:151–80.
  • Zaenen, Annie. 1979. “Infinitival complements in Dutch.” Papers from the fifteenth regional meeting, CLS. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

REFERENCES

  • Bird, Norman. 1982. The Distribution of Indo-European Root Morphemes. (A Checklist for Philologists). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  • Buck, Carl Darling. 1949. A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Cowgill, Warren and Manfred Mayrhofer. 1986. Indogermanische Grammatik. Bd 1.1/2. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
  • Jucquois, Guy. 1966. “La structure des racines en indo-européen envisagée d'un point de vue statistique”, Linguistic Research in Belgium. Yvan Lebrun (ed.). Wetteren: Universa, pp. 57–68.
  • Kurytowicz, Jerzy. 1964. The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
  • Lehmann, Winfred P. 1952. Proto-Indo-European Phonology. Austin & London: Texas University Press & Linguistic Society of America.
  • Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. I-II. München: Francke Verlag.
  • Szemerényi, Oswald. 1989. Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft. 3rd Ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.