Signifying female identity through grammatical innovation: A socio-cultural interpretation

REFERENCES

• Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckmann. 1979. The social construction of reality. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Peregrine.
   Google Scholar
• Burridge, Kate. 1992. “Creating grammar. Examples from Pennsylvania German.” Diachronic studies on the languages of the Anabaptists. Eds. Kate Burridge and Werner Enninger. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. Norbert Brockmeyer. pp. 199–241.
   Google Scholar
• Enninger, Werner. 1992. “Hatches, matches, and dispatches. Evidence of language shift and language change from an Anabaptist record of the Belfort area.” Diachronic studies on the languages of the Anabaptists. Eds. Kate Burridge and Werner Enninger. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. Norbert Brockmeyer. pp. 117–51.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. K. 1995. Sociolinguistic theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, John L. 1958. “Social influences in the choice of a linguistic variant.” WORD 14:47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1982. The Presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Goldap, Christel and Thomas Stolz. No date. “Universal and areal components of grammaticalization. Preliminary hypotheses.” (Privately circulated paper.)
   Google Scholar
• Goodenough, Ward H. 1964. “Cultural anthropology and linguistics.” Language in culture and society. A reader in linguistics and anthropology. Ed. Dell Hymes. New York: Harper and Row. pp. 36–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Elizabeth. 1997. “Sex, speech, and stereotypes: Why women use prestige speech forms more than men.” Language in society 26:47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graybill, Beth. 1998. “Mennonite women and their bishops in the founding phase of the eastern Pennsylvania Mennonite church.” Mennonite quarterly review 72.2:251–73.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hiünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hostetler, John A. and Gertrude Enders Huntington. 1971. Children in Amish society. Socialization and community education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Huffines, Marion Lois. 1988. “Pennsylvania German among the Plain groups: Convergence as a strategy of language maintenance.” Pennsylvania mennonite heritage 11,3:16.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Rudi. 1990. Sprachwandel. Tübingen: Francke.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Christian. 1991. “Grammaticalization and related changes in contemporary German.” Approaches to grammaticalization. Eds. E. C. Traugott and B. Heine. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp. 493–535.
   Google Scholar
• Milroy, Lesley. 1982. “Social network and linguistic focusing.” Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. Ed. S. Romaine. London: Edward Arnold. pp. 141–52.
   Google Scholar
• Olshan, Marc A. 1981. “Modernity, the folk society, and the Old Order Amish: An alternative interpretation.” Rural sociology 46, 2:297–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshan, Marc A. and Kimberly D. Schmidt. 1994. “Amish women and the feminist conundrum.” The Amish struggle with modernity. Eds. Donald B. Kraybill and Marc A. Olshan. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England. pp. 215–30.
   Google Scholar
• Redfield, Robert. 1947. “The folk society.” American journal of sociology 52:293–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesman, David. 1963. The lonely crowd. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romaine, Suzanne. 1984. The language of children and adolescents. The acquisition of communicative competence. New York: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Trudgill, Peter. 1972. “Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English Norwich.” Language in society 1:179–95.
   Google Scholar
• Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trudgill, Peter. 1983. On dialect: Social and geographical perspectives. New York: University Press. Van Ness, Silke. 1993. “Advances toward a new pronominal grammar.” WORD 44.2:193–204.
   Google Scholar
• Trudgill, Peter. 1995. “Ohio Amish women in the vanguard of a language change: Ohio Pennsylvania German.” American speech 70:69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, Walter A. 1969. A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
   Google Scholar