Areal factors in the development of the European periphrastic perfect

REFERENCES

• Aerts, Willem. 1967. Periphrastica. Chicago: Argonaut.
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, Wemer. 1977. Einfache Verbformen und verbale Gefüge in zwei Augsburger Chroniken des 15. Jahrhunderts. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, Henning. 1987. “From auxiliary to desinence.” Historical development of auxiliaries. Eds. Martin Harris and Paolo Ramat. Berlin, New York, and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 21–51
   Google Scholar
• Askedal, John Ole. 1995. “Geographical and typological description of verbal constructions in the modern Germanic languages.” Drei Studien zum Germanischen in alter und neuer Zeit. Eds. John Ole Askedal and Harald Bjorvand. Odense: Odense University Press. Pp. 95–146.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, Richard. 2000. “Französisch als dominante Sprache Europas.” Sprachgeschichte: Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung. 2nd ed. Part II. Eds. Werner Besch, Anne Betten. Oskar Reichmann, and Stefan Sonderegger. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. Pp. 1107–1117.
   Google Scholar
• Benveniste, Emile. 1960. “‘Ěitre’ et ‘avoir’ dans leurs functions linguistiques.” Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 55: 113–34.
   Google Scholar
• Benveniste, Emile. 1962. Hittite et indo-européen. Études comparatives. Paris: Adrien Maisonneuve.
   Google Scholar
• Blatt, Franz. 1957. “Latin influence on European syntax.” Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Copenhague. 2: 33–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bohn, Thomas and Adrea Rapp. 1995a. “Zur Untersuchung westmitteldeutscher Urkunden des 13. Jahrhunderts.” Beiträge zum Sprachkontakt und zu den Urkundensprachen zwischen Maas und Rhein. Eds. Kurt Gärtner and Günter Holtus. Trier: Verlag Trierer Historische Forschungen. Pp. 40–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bohn, Thomas and Adrea Rapp. 1995b. “Nachträge zum ‘Corpus der altdeutschen Originalurkunden’ mit Editionen und Untersuchungen.” Beiträge zum Sprachkontakt und zu den Urkundensprachen zwischen Maas und Rhein. Eds. Kurt Gärtner and Günter Holtus. Trier: Verlag Trierer Historische Forschungen. Pp. 215–83.
   Google Scholar
• Boley, Jacqueline. 1984. The Hittite hark construction. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, 44. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfante, Giuliano. 1960. “Les rapports linguistiques entre la Grèce et l'Italie.” In: Hommages à Léon Herrmann. Collection Latomus 44: 171–82.
   Google Scholar
• Bubenik, Vit. 1979. “Innovation in morphology: The historical development of the aspect-tense system in the Slavic languages.” International review of Slavic linguistics 4: 137–63.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calboli, Gualtiero. 1990. “Vulgärlatein und Griechisch in der Zeit Trajans.” Latin vulgaire—latin tardif. Ed. Gualtiero Calboli. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Pp. 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chantraine, Pierre. 1927. Histoire du parfait grec. Paris: Champion.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, Robert. 1975. “Greek influence on Latin syntax.” Transactions of the Philological Society. 101–56.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coseriu, Eugenio. 1971. “Das Problem des griechischen Einflusses auf das Vulgärlatein.” Sprache und Geschichte Eds. Eugenio Coseriu and Wolf-Dieter Stempel. München: Fink. Pp. 135–147.
   Google Scholar
• Costas, Procope. 1933. “An outline of the history of the Greek language with particular emphasis on the Koine and the subsequent stages.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Csató, Èva Ágnes. 1994. “Tense and actionality in Hungarian.” Tense systems in European languages. Eds. Rolf Thieroff and Joachim Ballweg. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Pp. 231–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Östen. 1990. “Standard Average European as an exotic language.” Toward a typology of European languages. Eds. Johannes Bechert, Giuliano Bernini, and Claude Buridant. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Östen. 1996. “Das Tempussystem des Deutschen im typologischen Vergleich.” Deutsch—typologisch. Eds. Ewald Lang and Gisela Zifonun. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. Pp. 359–68.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Östen., ed. 2000. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Danylenko, Andriy. 2002. “The East Slavic ‘HAVE’: Revising a Developmental Scenario.” Proceedings of the 13th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference; Los Angeles, November 9–10, 2001. Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series, 44. Pp. 105–27.
   Google Scholar
• Décsy, Gyula. 1973. Die linguistische Struktur Europas. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
   Google Scholar
• Drinka, Bridget. 1998. “The evolution of grammar: Evidence from Indo-European perfects.” Historical linguistics 1997. Eds. Monika Schmid, Jennifer Austin, and Dieter Stein. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 117–33.
   Google Scholar
• Drinka, Bridget. (In preparation) The development of the periphrastic perfect in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuisson, Michel. 1992. “Le contact linguistique gréco-latin: problèmes d'interférence et d'emprunts.” Lalies: Actes des sessions de linguistique et de literature 10: 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Elsness, Johan. 1997. The perfect and the preterite in contemporary and earlier English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Emout, Alfred, and François Thomas. 1951. Syntaxe Latine. Paris: Klincksieck.
   Google Scholar
• Feuillet, Jack. 2001. “Aire linguistique balkanique.” Language typology and language universals/Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien/La Typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques. Vol. 2. Eds. Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible. Berlin: de Gruyter. Pp. 1510–28.
   Google Scholar
• Flobert, Pierre. 1975. Les verbes deponents latins des origines à Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
   Google Scholar
• Foulet, Lucien. 1920. “La disparition du prétérite.” Romania 46: 271–313
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Victor. 1976. “Dialectal synchrony and diachronic syntax: The Macedonian perfect.” Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax. Eds. Sanford B. Steever, Carol A. Walker, and Salikoko Mufwene. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. Pp. 96–104.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, Herbert. 1987. “From Indo-European perfect to Slavic perfect to Slavic preterite.” Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Eds. Onofrio Carruba and Giuliano Bernini. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 251–65.
   Google Scholar
• Gärtner, Kurt. 1995. “Zur Erforschung der westmitteldeutschen Urkundensprachen im 13. Jahrhundert.” Chronologische, areale und situative Varietäten des Deutschen in der Sprachhistoriographie. Eds. Gotthard Lerchner, Marianne Schröder, and Ulla Fix. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gärtner, Kurt and Günter Holtus. 1995. “Einführung in das Project 'Westmitteldeutsche und ostfranzösische Urkunden-und Literatursprachen im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert” Beiträge zum Sprachkontakt und zu den Urkundensprachen zwischen Maas und Rhein. Eds. Kurt Gärtner and Günter Holtus. Trier: Verlag Trierer Historische Forschungen. Pp. 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, Paul. 1949. “Standard Average European and Czech.” Studio linguistica 3: 65–85.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, Nina. 2000. “Macedonian—a language with three perfects?” Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Ed. Östen Dahl. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 479–94.
   Google Scholar
• Grønvik, Ottar. 1986. Über den Ursprung und die Entwicklung der aktiven Perfekt und Plusquamperfektkonstruktionen des Hochdeutschen und ihre Eigenart innerhalb des germanischen Sprachraumes. Oslo: Solum Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gvozdanović, Jadranka. 1995. “Western South Slavic tenses in a typological perspective.” Tense systems in European languages II. Ed. Rolf Thieroff. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Pp. 181–94.
   Google Scholar
• Haase, Martin. 1994. “Tense and Aspect in Basque.” Tense systems in European languages. Eds. Rolf Thieroff and Joachim Ballweg. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Pp. 279–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hajnal, István and Lázló Mezey. 1959. L'enseignement de l'écriture aux universités médiévales. (2nd expanded ed.) Budapest: Maison d'Édition de l'Académie des Sciences de Hongrie.
   Google Scholar
• Happ, Heinz. 1967. “Die latienische Umgangssprache und die Kunstsprache des Plautus.” Glotta 45: 60–104.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Martin. 1978. The evolution of French syntax: A comparative approach. London and New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Martin. 1982. “The ‘past simple’ and the ‘present perfect’ in Romance.” Studies in the Romance verb. Eds. Nigel Vincent and Martin Harris. London and Canberra: Croom Helm. Pp. 42–70.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. “How young is Standard Average European?” Language sciences 20: 271–87.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. “The European linguistic area: Standard Average European.” Language typology and language universals. Vol. 2. Eds. Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Pp. 1492–1510.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzidakis, Georgios. 1977. Einleitung in die neugriechische Grammatik. Hildesheim and New York: Georg Olms. (Reprint of 1892 edition.)
   Google Scholar
• Heiné, Bernd. 1994. “Areal influence on grammaticalization.” Language contact and language conflict. Ed. M. Putz. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Heiné, Bernd. 1997. Possession. Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, Hans-Walter. 1995. “Volkssprache und Verwaltung in Oberlothringen im Spätmittelalter und der frühen Neuzeit.” Beiträge zum Sprachkontakt und zu den Urkundensprachen zwischen Maas und Rhein. Eds. Kurt Gärtner and Günter Holtus. Trier: Verlag Trierer Historische Forschungen. Pp. 129–71.
   Google Scholar
• Isačenko, Alexander. 1974. “On “have' and ‘be’ languages (A typological sketch).” Slavic forum. Ed. Michael Flier. The Hague and Paris: Mouton. Pp. 43–77.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, Lars. 2000. “Viewpoint operators in European languages.” Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Ed. Östen Dahl. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 27–187.
   Google Scholar
• Kaimio, Jorma. 1979. The Romans and the Greek language. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.
   Google Scholar
• Knjazev, Jurij. 1988. “Resultative, passive, and perfect in Russian.” Typology of resultative constructions. Ed. Vladimir Nedjalkov. (Translation, ed. by Bernard Comrie, of Tipologija rezultativnyx konstrukcij. 1983. Leningrad: Nauk.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 343–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kuteva, Tania. 1998. “Large linguistic areas in grammaticalization: Auxiliation in Europe.” Language sciences 20.3: 289–311.
   Google Scholar
• Kuteva, Tania. 2000. “TAM-auxiliation, and the avertive category in Northeast Europe.” Grammaticalisation aréale et sémantique cognitive: les langues fenniques et sames. Ed. M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest. Paris: Fondation de la langue Estonienne.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, Kaj B. 1957. Über den oberdeutschen Präteritumschwund. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Tiedeakatemian Toimituksia. Ser. B. Tom 112, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, Jonko. 2000. “The perfect—aspectual, temporal, and evidential.” Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Ed. Osten Dahl. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 365–83.
   Google Scholar
• Lötzch. Ronald. 1995. “Das sorbische Tempussystem.” Tense systems in European languages II. Ed. Rolf Thieroff. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Pp. 167–79.
   Google Scholar
• Marrou, H. 1964. A history of education in antiquity. New York: New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Maslov, Jurij S. 1988. “Resultative, perfect, and aspect.” Typology of resultative constructions. Ed. Vladimir Nedjalkov. (Translation, ed. by Bernard Comrie, of Tipologija rezul'tativnyx konstrukcij. 1983. Leningrad: Nauk.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 63–85.
   Google Scholar
• Mattheier, Klaus. 2000. “Die Herausbildung neuzeitlicher Schriftsprachen.” Sprachgeschichte: Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung. 2nd ed. Part II. Eds. Werner Besch, Anne Betten, Oskar Reichmann, and Stefan Sonderegger. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. Pp. 1085–1107.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, Friedrich. 1926. Untersuchungen über die deutsche Verbstellung. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Nedjalkov, Vladimir and Sergei Jaxontov. 1988. “The typology of resultative constructions.” Typology of resultative constructions. Ed. Vladimir Nedjalkov. (Translation, ed. by Bernard Comrie, of Tipologija rezul' tativnyx konstrukcij. 1983. Leningrad: Nauk.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. Pp. 3–62.
   Google Scholar
• Öhmann, Emil. 1931. “Der französische Einfluss auf die deutsche Sprache im Mittelalter.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 32: 195–220.
   Google Scholar
• Öhmann, Emil. 1951. Die mittelhochdeutsche Lehnprägung nach altfranzösischem Vorbild. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Tiedeakatemian Toimituksia. Ser. B, Tom 68, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, Robert. 1992. “Slavo-Celtica.” Canadian Slavonic papers/Revue canadienne des slavistes 34.3: 245–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panzer, Baldur. 1984. “Parallel internal development or interference? Post-positive article and possessive perfect in North Germanic and northern Russian.” Scandinavian language contacts. Eds. P. Sture Ureland and Iain Clarkson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 111–32.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Ian. 1983. “The rise of the vernaculars in Early Modern Europe: An essay in the political economy of language.” The sociogenesis of language and human conduct. Ed. Bruce Bain. New York and London: Plenum Press. Pp. 323–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkster, Harm. 1983. “Tempus, aspect, and Aktionsart in Latin (Recent trends 1961–1981).” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. 2, 29/1. Eds. Hildegard Temporini and Wolfgang Haase. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Pp. 270–319.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkster, Harm. 1987. “The strategy and chronology of the development of future and perfect tense auxiliaries in Latin.” Historical development of auxiliaries. Eds. Martin Harris and Paolo Ramat. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 193–223.
   Google Scholar
• Pisani, Vittore. 1981. “Origini e fortuna del passato prossimo.” Logos Semantikos. Vol. IV. Ed. Christian Rohrer. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Pp. 435–441.
   Google Scholar
• Ramat, Paolo. 1982. “Ein Beispiel von ‘Reanalysis’, typologisch betrachtet.” Folia linguistica 16: 365–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ramat, Paolo. 1987. Linguistic typology. Berlin. New York and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ramat, Paolo and Giuliano Bernini. 1990. “Area influence versus typological drift in Western Europe: The case of negation.” Toward a typology of European languages. Eds. Johannes Bechert, Giuliano Bernini, and Claude Buridant. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Renou, Louis. 1925. La valeur du parfait dans les hymnes védique. Paris: Champion.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, Thomas. 1990. “The unaccusative hypothesis and the history of the perfect auxiliary in Germanic and Romance.” Historical Linguistics 1987. Papers from the 8th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Eds. Henning Andersen and Konrad Koerner. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. Pp. 461–87.
   Google Scholar
• Sihler, Andrew L. 1995. New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, John Charles. 1989. “Actualization reanalyzed: Evidence from the Romance compound past tenses.” Synchronic and diachronic approaches to language variation and change. Ed. Thomas Walsh. Washington. D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Pp. 310–25.
   Google Scholar
• Squartini, Mario and Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2000. “The simple and compound past in Romance languages.” Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Ed. Östen Dahl. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 403–39.
   Google Scholar
• Taube, Moshe. 1980. “On the penetration of the perfect into the Russian narrative system.” Russian linguistics 5: 121–31.
   Google Scholar
• Thielmann, P. 1885. “habere mit dem Part. Perf. Pass.” Archiv für lateinische Lexicographie und Grammatik 2: 372–423: 509–49.
   Google Scholar
• Thieroff, Rolf. 2000. “On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe.” Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Ed. Östen Dahl. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 264–305.
   Google Scholar
• Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language contact: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomason, Sarah G. and Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trudgill, Peter. 1983. On Dialect: Social and geographical perspectives. New York and London: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tschernych, P. J. Historische Grammatik der russischen Sprache. Halle (Saale): Max Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Auwera, Johan, ed. 1998. Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilev, Christo. 1968. “Der romanische Perfekttyp im Slavischen.” Slavistische Studien. Eds. Erwin Koschmieder and Maximilian Braun. München: Trofenik. Pp. 215–30.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, Nigel. 1982. “The development of the auxiliaries HABERE and ESSE in Romance.” Studies in the Romance verb. Eds. Nigel Vincent and Martin Harris. London and Canberra: Croom Helm. Pp. 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Wackernagel, Jacob. 1904. Studien zum griechischen Perfektum. Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, William Dwight. 1889. Sanskrit grammar. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whorf, Benjamin L. 1956. Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Ed J. B. Carroll. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiemer, Björn. 1998. “Pragmatical inferences at the threshold to grammaticalization. The case of Lithuanian predicative participles and their functions.” Linguistica Baltica 7: 229–43.
   Google Scholar
• Wiemer, Björn. 2001. “Partizipien zwischen Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik: Ein Überblick zu aspektuellen, diathesebezogenen und diskursrelevanten Eigenschaften im modernen Litauischen.” Sprachbeschreibung & Typologie (Publikation zum Workshop vom 16. Dezember 2000 in Bern) Arbeitspapiere 38. Eds. B. Wälchli and F. Züñiga. Bern: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. Pp. 65–81.
   Google Scholar