Marked Themes and thematic patterns in abstracts, advertisements and administrative documents

REFERENCES

• Brown, G. and G. Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, P. 2001. “Thematisation in undergraduate essays.” English Australia journal. 19.2:29-18.
   Google Scholar
• Danes, Frantisek. 1974. “Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text.” Papers on functional sentence perspective. Ed. Frantisek Danes. The Hague: Mouton. Pp. 106-128.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, F. 1994. “From writer roles to elements of text: Interactive, organisational and topical.” Reflections on language learning. Eds. L. Barbara and M. Scott. Cleveton: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, A. and J. Lavid. 1998. “Information progression strategies in administrative forms: A cross-linguistic study.” Linguistic choices across genres. Eds. A. Sanchez-Macarro and R. Carter. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, B. L. 1987. “A reformulation of thematic progression typology.” Text 7.2:89-116.
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, Suzane. 1994. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Foz, M. Carmen. 2002. “A contribution to a descriptive functional-semantic framework for theme analysis.” WORD 53.2:173-183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, G. 1989. “Thematic selection and distribution in written discourse.” WORD 40.1-2: 201-221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadessy, Mohsen. 1995. “Thematic development and its relationship to registers and genres.” Thematic development in English texts. Ed. Mohsen Ghadessy. London: Pinter. Pp. 129-146.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadessy, Mohsen. 1999. “Textual features and contextual factor for register identification.” Text and context in functional linguistics. Ed. Mohsen Ghadessy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 125-139.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, T. R. 1993. Towards a discourse theory of abstracts and abstracting. Monographs in Systemic Linguistics, 5. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, Department of English Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gosden, H. 1992. “Discourse function of marked theme in scientific research articles.” English for specific purposes 11:225-242.
   Google Scholar
• Gosden, H. 1993. “Discourse functions of subject in scientific research articles.” Applied linguistics 14.1:56-75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goutsos, D. 1997. Modeling discourse topic: Sequential relations and strategies in expository text. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Guijarro, A. J. M. and Hernandez, J. I. A. 2001. “Points of departure in news and tourist brochures: Choices of theme and topic.” Text 21. 3:347-372.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1970. “Language structure and language functions.” New horizons in linguistics. Ed. John Lyons. Harmondsworth: Penguin Pp. 140-165.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hawes, T. and S. Thomas. 1996. “Rhetorical uses of theme in newspaper editorials.” World Englishes 15.2:159-170.
   Google Scholar
• Iedcma, R. 1997. “The language of administration: Organizing human activity in formal institutions.” Genres and institutions. Social processes in the workplace and school. Eds. F. Christie and J. R. Martin. London: Casseil. Pp. 73-100.
   Google Scholar
• Kies, D. 1988. “Marked themes with and without pronominal reinforcement: Their meaning and distribution in discourse.” Pragmatics, discourse and text: Some systemically-inspired approaches. Eds. E. H. Steiner and R. Veltman. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Kong. K. C. C. 2001. “Marketing of belief: Intertextual construction of network marketers’ identities.” Discourse and society 12.4:473-503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzon, D. 1984. “Themes, hypcrthemes and the discourse structure of British legal texts.” Text 4.1-3:31-55.
   Google Scholar
• Longacre, Robert E. 1976. An anatomy of speech functions. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 2000. “Close reading: Functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis.” Researching language in schools and communities. Ed. L. Unsworth. London: Cassell. Pp. 275-302.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, M. B. D. 1996. “The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics.” Text 16.4:481-499.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1983. “Structure and theme in printed school text.” Text 1.2:197-228.
   Google Scholar
• Ventola, E. 1994. “Finnish writers’ academic English: Problems with reference and theme.” Functions of language 1.2:261-193.
   Google Scholar
• Zhoa, Jian-cheng and Yu-guo Yu. 1993. “Thematic patterns and thematic choice in English advertisements.” Language, text, context. Ed. Yong-sheng Zhu. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. Pp. 126-139. [In Chinese]
   Google Scholar