Negotiating a position within heteroglossic diversity: wh-clefts and it-clefts in written discourse

REFERENCES

• Bakhtin, M. 1986. “The problem of speech genres.” Speech genres and other late essays, Tr. V. W. McGee, Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D. S., M. Johansson, G. Leech. S. Conrad and E. Finnegan. 1999. Longman grammar of written and spoken English. Longman: London.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. C. 1991. Cleft and pseudo-cleft constructions in English. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davidse, K. 2000. “A constructional approach to clefts.” Linguistics 38–6: 1101–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declerck, R. 1983. “The pragmatics of it-clefts and wh-clefts.” Lingua 64: 251–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declerck, R. 1988. Studies on copular sentences, clefts and psuedo-clefts. Leuven: Leuven University Press and Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Declerck, R. 1994. “The taxonomy and interpretation of clefts and pseudoclefts.” Lingua. 9.1: 183–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delahunty, G. P. 2001. “Discourse functions in inferential sentences.” Linguistics 39.3: 517–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delin, J. 1989. “Cleft constructions in discourse.” Ph. D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Delin, J. 1990. Accounting for cleft constructions in discourse: A multi-layered approach. Edinburgh: HCRC Publications. University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, A. and P. Locke. 2002. A university course in English grammar. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, S. 1994. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Geluykens, R. 1988. “Five types of clefting in English discourse.” Linguistics 26–5: 823–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-González, M. 2001. The theme-topic interface. Evidence from English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gundel, J. K. 1977. “Where do cleft sentences come from?” Language 53.3: 543–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundel, J. K. 2001. “Information structure and the use of cleft sentences in English and Norwegian.” reports of the project Languages in contrast http://www.hf.uio.no/german/sprik
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. “Notes on Transitivity and theme in English.” Journal of linguistics 3.2: 177–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd ed. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman
   Google Scholar
• Hedberg, N. 1990. “Discourse pragmatics and cleft sentences in English.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Herriman, J. 2003. “Negotiating identity: The interpersonal functions of wh-clefts in English.” Functions of language 10.1: 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Herriman, J. (in preparation.) “Identifying relations: the experiential functions of wh-clefts in English.”
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S. R. 1979. The pseudo-cleft construction in English. New York: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston, R. 1988. Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston, R. and G. K. Pullum 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunston, S. and G. Thompson. 2000. Evaluation in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, M. 2002. “Clefts in English and Swedish: A contrastive study of IT-clefts and WH-clefts in original texts and translations.” Ph. D. dissertation, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. B. and L. Jones. 1985. “Discourse functions of live English sentence types.” WORD 36.1: 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, K. 2001. “A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions.” Linguistics 39.3: 456–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 1992. English text, system and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. C. Matthiessen and C. Painter. 1997. Working with functional grammar. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 2000. “Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English.” Evaluation of text. Eds. S. Hunston and G. Thompson, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 142–175.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, C. 1995. Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, E. 1978. “A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse.” Language 54.4: 883–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sornicola, R. 1988. “It-clefts and wh-clefts: Two awkward sentence types.” Linguistics 24: 243–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P. R. R. and Alexanne Don. 2001. Workshop on appraisal—ISFC 28, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• White, P. R. R. 2003. “Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of inter-subjective stance.” Text 23.2: 259–284.
   Google Scholar
• Appraisal on WWW:www.grammatics.com/appraisal, accessed May 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Corpus Material: Freiburg-LOB Corpus of British English (FLOB) (1991)
   Google Scholar