The structure of content questions in Cheyenne

References

• Blain, Eleanor M. 1997. ‘Wh’-constructions in Nêhiyawêwin (Plains Cree). Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia (doctoral thesis).
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, Heather A. 2013. The Blackfoot configurationality conspiracy: Parallels and differences in clausal and nominal structures. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia (doctoral thesis).
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, Leonard. 1946. Algonquian. Harry Hoijer, Mary R. Haas, and Cornelius Osgood (eds.), Linguistic structures of Native America. Viking fund publications in anthropology 6, 85–129. New York: The Viking Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, Leonard. 1958. Eastern Ojibwa: Grammatical sketch, texts and word list. In C. S. Hockett (ed.). Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brittain, Julie. 1997. The conjunct verb in Sheshatshit Montagnais. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 42. 253–84. doi: 10.1017/S0008413100016947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain, Julie. 2001. The morphosyntax of the Algonquian conjunct verb: A minimalist approach. New York and London: Garland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bruening, Benjamin. 2001. Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (doctoral thesis).
   Google Scholar
• Bruening, Benjamin. 2004. Two types of ‘wh’-scope marking in Passamaquoddy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22. 229–305. doi: 10.1023/B:NALA.0000015793.52445.4e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese, Andrea. 1984. Multiple questions and focus in Italian. In W. de Geest and Y. Putseys (eds.), Sentential complementation, 67–74. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, Andrea. 1987. Focus structure in Berber: A comparative analysis with Italian. In M. Guerssel and K. Hale (eds.), Studies in Berber Syntax, Lexicon project working papers 14, 103–20. Cambridge: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Campana, Mark. 1996. The conjunct order in Algonquian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 41. 201–34. doi: 10.1017/S0008413100016406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Lisa L-S. 1991. On the typology of ‘Wh’-questions. New York and London: Garland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, M. Ya-yin. 2000. On Tsou ‘Wh’-questions: movement or in situ? Language and Linguistics 1(2). 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In S. R. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On ‘wh’-movement. In P. W. Culicover, A. Akmajian and T. Wasow (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Clare E. 2008. The syntax and semantics of clause-typing in Plains Cree. Madison: University of Wisconsin (M.S. thesis).
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Clare E. 2014. The clause-typing system of Plains Cree. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, Andrew. 2004. Gros Ventre Grammar Sketch. Distributed through CSILW website.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, Andrew, and Alonzo Moss Sr. 2002a. The conjunct order in Arapaho: Forms and functions. In C. Wolfart (ed.), Papers of the thirty-third Algonquian conference, 162–80. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, Andrew, and Alonzo Moss Sr. 2002b. A reconstructed conjunct order participle in Arapaho. International Journal of American Linguistics 68(3). 321–65. doi: 10.1086/466493
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, Andrew, and Alonzo Moss Sr. 2008. The Arapaho language. Boulder: Colorado University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, Amy. 1991. Plains cree morphosyntax. New York: Garland Publications (PhD. dissertation).
   Google Scholar
• Déchaine, Rose-Marie, and Martina Wiltschko. 2014. Micro-variation in agreement, clause-typing and finiteness. In J. R. Valentine and M. MacAuley (eds.), Comparative evidence from Blackfoot and Plains Cree. Papers of the 42nd. Conference, 69–101. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drapeau, Lynn. 2017. A grammatical sketch of the Innu language (Algonquian). In M. Fortescue, M. Mithun, and N. Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis, 560–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryer, Matthew S. 1998. Obviation across clause boundaries in Kutenai. In J. Kytle, H. Khym, and S. Kookiattikoon (eds.), Studies in Native American Linguistics IX, Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 22 (2): 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Dryer, Matthew S. 2004. Typological database. Online: linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/database.
   Google Scholar
• Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1986. Wh-questions and focus. Linguistics and Philosophy 9(2). 117–49. doi: 10.1007/BF00635608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz, Donald G. 1991. Blackfoot grammar. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, Ives. 1979. Delaware verbal morphology: A descriptive and comparative study. New York / London: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, Kenneth L. 1983. Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1(1). 5–47. doi: 10.1007/BF00210374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, Francis R. 1979. The pseudo-cleft construction in English. New York: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) (doctoral thesis).
   Google Scholar
• Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2(1). 39–76. doi: 10.1007/BF00233713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jespersen, Otto. 1927. A modern English grammar on historical principles, Part III, Syntax. Second Volume. Heidelberg: Carl Winters.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, Alana. 1982. A unified analysis of relative clauses and questions in Rainy River Ojibway. In W. Cowan (ed.), Papers of the thirteenth Algonquian conference, 161–68. Ottawa: Carleton University.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Meredith. 2012. New arguments for the position of the verb in Potawatomi. In M. Macauley, M. Noodin, and J. R. Valentine (eds.), Papers of the forty-fourth Algonquian conference, 157–73. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, Katalin É. 1995. Introduction. In É. Kiss (ed.), Discourse-configurational languages, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lasnik, Howard, and Tim Stowell. 1991. Weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 687–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leman, Elena M. 1999. Cheyenne major constituent order. Dallas, TX: SIL International.
   Google Scholar
• Leman, Wayne. 1985. Cheyenne pronouns and pronominal functions. University of Oregon (unpublished manuscript).
   Google Scholar
• Leman, Wayne. 1986. Cheyenne complementation. University of Oregon (unpublished manuscript).
   Google Scholar
• Leman, Wayne. 1987. Náévȧhóóȯhtséme / We are going back home. Cheyenne History and Stories told by James Shoulderblade and Others. Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics, Memoir 4. Winnipeg.
   Google Scholar
• Leman, Wayne. 2011. A Reference Grammar of the Cheyenne Language. 4th edn., Vols. 1 and 2. Occasional Publications in Anthropology, Linguistics Series 5. Museum of Anthropology, University of Northern Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Leman, Wayne, Louise Fisher, Leroy Pine Sr., and Marie Sanchez. 2006. Cheyenne dictionary. Lame Deer: Chief Dull Knife College.
   Google Scholar
• Lochbihler, Bethany, and Éric Mathieu. 2010. ‘Wh’- agreement in Ojibwe: Consequences of feature inheritance and the categorial status of tense. In H. Bliss and R. Girard (eds.), University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, Proceedings of WSCLA 13 and 14, Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas, 14–31.
   Google Scholar
• Lochbihler, Bethany, and Éric Mathieu. 2016. Clause typing and feature inheritance of discourse features. Syntax 19(4). 354–91. doi: 10.1111/synt.12126
   Google Scholar
• Meeussen, Achiel E. 1962. The independent order in Cheyenne. Orbis 11. 260–88.
   Google Scholar
• Mithun, Marianne. 1992. Is basic word order universal. Pragmatics of word order flexibility 22. 15–61. doi: 10.1075/tsl.22.02mit
   Google Scholar
• Otsuka, Yuko. 2015. The typology of ‘wh’-words: An Austronesian perspective. In Collaborative Research Project A diachronic contrastive study of Japanese interrogatives, Research report (3): 174–195.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, Will. 2013. Verb morphology on Innu-aimun pronouns: Evidence for the nature of Algonquian ‘wh’-questions. In K. S. Hele and J. R. Valentine (eds.), Papers of the forty-first Algonquian conference, 208–29. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petter, Rodolphe. 1952. Cheyenne grammar. Newton, KS: Mennonite Publication Office.
   Google Scholar
• Postal, Paul M. 1971. Cross-over phenomena, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Postal, Paul M. 1993. Remarks on weak crossover effects. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 539–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinholtz, Charlotte, and Kevin Russell. 1995. Quantified NPs in pronominal argument languages: Evidence from Swampy Cree. In Proceedings-NELS 25, 389–404. University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, Richard. 1992. The syntax of possessor obviation in Ojibwe. Paper Presented at CAIL 31, UC Berkeley, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Norvin W. 2004. The syntax of the conjunct and independent orders in Wampanoag. International Journal of American Linguistics 70. 327–68. doi: 10.1086/429206
   Google Scholar
• Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) (doctoral thesis).
   Google Scholar
• Rudin, Catherine. 1988. Multiple questions in South Slavic, West Slavic, and Romanian. The Slavic and East European Journal 32. 1–24. doi: 10.2307/308923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Dale W. 1987. Cheyenne verb agreement in GPSG. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (Ph.D. dissertation).
   Google Scholar
• Tomlin, Russell, and Richard Rhodes. 1994. Information distribution in Ojibwa. Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility 22. 117–35. doi: 10.1075/tsl.22.05tom
   Google Scholar
• Wasow, Thomas. 1979. Anaphora in generative grammar. Ghent: E. Story-Scientia.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfart, Hans-Christoph. 1973. Plains Cree: A grammatical study. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. New Series 63 (5). Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
   Google Scholar