Exploring factors contributing to the receptive and productive knowledge of phrasal verbs in the EFL context

References

• Akbary, M., H. Shahriari, and A. Hosseini Fatemi. 2016. The value of song lyrics for teaching and learning English phrasal verbs: a corpus investigation of four music genres. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 12(4). 344–56. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2016.1216121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alejo Gonzalez, R. A. 2010. L2 Spanish acquisition of English phrasal verbs: a cognitive linguistic analysis of L1 influence. In M. C. Campoy-Cubillo, B. Belles- Fortuno and M. L. Gea-Valor (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to English language teaching, 149–66. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Altenberg, B. 1998. On the phraseology of spoken English. In A. P. Cowie (ed.), Phraseology: theory, analysis, and applications, 79–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bamford, J., and R. Day. 1998. Teaching reading. Annual Review Of Applied Linguistics 18. 124–41. doi: 10.1017/s0267190500003512
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad, and E. Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., R. Waring, and S. Donkaewbua. 2008. Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading while listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language 20(2). 136–63.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., and J. Truscott. 2010. The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics 31(5). 693–713. doi: 10.1093/applin/amq031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon, N., and P. Kelly. 2002. Does cognitive linguistics have anything to offer English language learners in their efforts to master phrasal verbs? ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 137-138(1). 205–31. doi: 10.1075/itl.137-138.03con
   Google Scholar
• Dagut, M., and B. Laufer. 1985. Avoidance of phrasal verbs—a case for contrastive analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7(1). 73–9.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. M., and L. S. Gray. 1999. Going after the phrasal verb: an alternative approach to classification. TESOL Quarterly 33(1). 65–83. doi: 10.2307/3588191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., V. Durow, and K. Zahran. 2004. Individual differences and their effects on formulaic sequence acquisition. In N. Schmitt (ed.), Formulaic sequences, 87–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.9.06dor
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C. 2001. Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 206–57. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elley, W. B. 1989. Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories. Reading Research Quarterly 24(2). 174–87. doi: 10.2307/747863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2015. Understanding second language acquisition 2nd edition-Oxford applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., H. Basturkmen, and S. Loewen. 2001a. Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning 51(2). 281–318. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., H. Basturkmen, and S. Loewen. 2001b. Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 35(3). 407–32. doi: 10.2307/3588029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeborn, D. 1995. A course book in English grammar. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, D., and M. Davies. 2007. Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: a corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly 41(2). 339–59. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00062.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier, M., and N. Schmitt. 2015. The PHaVE list: a pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses. Language Teaching Research 19(6). 645–66. doi: 10.1177/1362168814559798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier, M., and N. Schmitt. 2016. Picking up polysemous phrasal verbs: how many do learners know and what facilitates this knowledge? System 59. 29–44. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2016.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, S. 1998. Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: collocations and formulae. In A. P. Cowie (ed.), Phraseology: theory, analysis, and applications, 79–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Fernandez, B., and N. Schmitt. 2015. How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have? The effects of frequency and amount of exposure. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 166(1). 94–126. doi: 10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer
   Google Scholar
• Horst, M. 2009. Revisiting classrooms as lexical environments. In T. Fitzpatrick and A. Barfield (eds.), Lexical processing in second language learners, 53–66. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, M., T. Cobb, and P. Meara. 1998. Beyond a clockwork orange: acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 11(2). 207–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J., and E. Marchena. 1989. Avoidance: grammatical or semantic causes? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11(3), 241–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, A., and D. Beglar. 2005. A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language 17(1). 23–59.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D. 1976. Formal and informal linguistic environments in language acquisition and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 10. 157–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppens, A. H. 2010. Incidental foreign language acquisition from media exposure. Learning, Media and Technology 35(1). 65–85. doi: 10.1080/17439880903561876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. 2000. Avoidance of idioms in a second language: the effect of L1-L2 degree of similarity. Studia Linguistica 54(2). 186–96. doi: 10.1111/1467-9582.00059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. 2003. Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. Canadian Modern Language Review 59(4). 567–87. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. 2005. Focus on form in second language vocabulary acquisition. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, M. P. Garcia-Mayo, and J. Cenoz (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 5, 223–50. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., C. Elder, K. Hill, and P. Congdon. 2004. Size and strength: do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge? Language Testing 21. 202–26.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., and S. Eliasson. 1993. What causes avoidance in L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(1). 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, Y., and Y. J. Fukuya. 2004. Avoidance of phrasal verbs: the case of Chinese learners of English. Language Learning 54(2). 193–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00254.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, P. M. 2014. Investigating the validity of internet television as a resource for acquiring L2 formulaic sequences. System 42. 164–76. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D. 2011. The most frequently used English phrasal verbs in American and British English: a multicorpus examination. TESOL Quarterly 45(4). 661–88. doi: 10.5054/tq.2011.247707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. 1991. Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective 2(1). 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, R., and N. Schmitt. 2012. A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics 32. 229–320. doi: 10.1093/applin/ams010
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., and F. O’Dell. 2004. English phrasal verbs in use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, J. 2008. Vocabulary uptake from informal learning tasks. Language Learning Journal 36(2). 227–37. doi: 10.1080/09571730802390742
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 1990. Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 2001. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 2008. Teaching vocabulary: strategies and techniques. Boston: Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P., and P. Meara. 2010. Vocabulary. In N. Schmitt (ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics, 34–52. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P., and S. Webb. 2011. Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Boston: Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Pellicer-Sánchez, A., and N. Schmitt. 2010. Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: do things fall apart? Reading in a Foreign Language 22(1). 31–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pigada, M., and N. Schmitt. 2006. Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: a case study. Reading in a Foreign Language 18(1). 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Rott, S. 1999. The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(4). 589–619.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, J. 1974. An error in error analysis. Language Learning 24(2). 205–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11(2). 129–58. doi: 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. 2000. Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 2001. Attention. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 3–32. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. 2008. Review article: instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research 12(3). 329–63. doi: 10.1177/1362168808089921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. 2010. Researching vocabulary: a vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., Z. Dornyei, S. Adolphs, and V. Durow. 2004. Knowledge and acquisition of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (ed.), Formulaic sequences: acquisition, processing and use, 55–86. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., and S. Redwood. 2011. Learner knowledge of phrasal verbs: a corpus-informed study. In F. Meunier, S. de Cock, G. Gilquin and M. Paquot (eds.), A taste for corpora, 173–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Siyanova, A., and N. Schmitt. 2007. Native and nonnative use of multi-word vs. one-word verbs. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 45(2). 119–39. doi: 10.1515/IRAL.2007.005
   Google Scholar
• Siyanova, A., and N. Schmitt. 2008. L2 learner production and processing of collocation: a multi-study perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review 64(3). 429–58. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.64.3.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöholm, K. 2004. The complexity of the learning and teaching of EFL among Swedish-minority students in bilingual Finland. Journal of Curriculum Studies 36(6). 685–96. doi: 10.1080/0022027041000229387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in it development. In S. M. Gass and C. G. Madden (eds.), Input in second language acquisition, 235–52. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 1995. Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook, and B Seidlhofer (eds.), Principles and practice in the study of language, 125–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 2000. The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 97–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., and S. Lapkin. 1995. Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: a step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics 16(3). 371–91. doi: 10.1093/applin/16.3.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waibel, B. 2008. Phrasal verbs: German and Italian learners of English compared. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, R., and M. Takaki. 2003. At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading in a Foreign Language 15(2). 130.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. 2005. Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: the effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27. 33–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, S. 2007. The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics 28(1). 46-65. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, S. A., and A. C. S. Chang. 2012. Second language vocabulary growth. RELC Journal 43(1). 113–26. doi: 10.1177/0033688212439367
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S., J. Newton, and A. Chang. 2013. Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning 63(1). 91–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00729.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyss, R. 2003. Putting phrasal verbs into perspective. TESOL Journal 12(1). 37–8. doi: 10.1002/j.1949-3533.2003.tb00118.x
   Google Scholar