Individual Differences in Reading Speed are Linked to Variability in the Processing of Lexical and Contextual Information: Evidence from Single-trial Event-related Brain Potentials

References

• Andrews, Sally. 2012. Individual differences in skilled visual word recognition and reading. Visual Word Recognition 2. 151–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, Jane, Keith Rayner, and Charles Clifton. 2005. Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 58(6). 1065–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, Horacio A., Leun J. Otten, Stavroula-Thaleia Kousta, and Gabriella Vigliocco. 2013. Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task. Brain and Language 125(1). 47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, Dale J. 2013. Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers, and Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2014. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, Douglas, Reinhold Kliegl, Shravan Vasishth, and Harald Baayen. 2015. Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04967.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Daniel J., and Patrick J. Curran. 2005. Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research 40(3). 373–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkum, Jos J. V., Peter Hagoort, and C. Mackenzie Brown. 1999. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11(6). 657–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudewyn, Megan Ann, Debra L. Long, and Tamara Y. Swaab. 2013. Effects of working memory span on processing of lexical associations and congruence in spoken discourse. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, Marc, and Boris New. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41(4). 977–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camblin, C. Christine, Peter C. Gordon, and Tamara Y. Swaab. 2007(a). The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. Journal of Memory and Language 56(1). 103–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camblin, C. Christine, Kerry Ledoux, Megan Boudewyn, Peter C. Gordon, and Tamara Y. Swaab. 2007(b). Processing new and repeated names: effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP. Brain Research 1146. 172–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, Max, Eileen Davelaar, Jón Torfi Jónasson, and Derek Besner. 1977. Access to the internal lexicon. In Stan Dornic (ed.), Attention & Performance VI, 535–55. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, Geoff. 2014. The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science 25(1). 7–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, Patrick. J., Daniel J. Bauer, and Michael T. Willoughby. 2004. Testing main effects and interactions in latent curve analysis. Psychological Methods 9(2). 220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambacher, Michael, Reinhold Kliegl, Markus Hofmann, and Arthur M. Jacobs. 2006. Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Research 1084(1). 89–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, Arnaud, and Scott Makeig. 2004. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 134(1). 9–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimigen, Olaf, Werner Sommer, Annette Hohlfeld, Arthur M. Jacobs, and Reinhold Kliegl. 2011. Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 140(4). 552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditman, Tall, Phillip J. Holcomb, and Gina R. Kuperberg. 2007. An investigation of concurrent ERP and self-paced reading methodologies. Psychophysiology 44(6). 927–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everatt, John, and Geoffrey Underwood. 1994. Individual differences in reading subprocesses: Relationships between reading ability, lexical access, and eye movement control. Language and Speech 37(3). 283–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabiani, Monika, Gabriele Gratton, and Kara D Federmeier. 2007. Event-related brain potentials: methods, theory, and applications. In John T. Cacioppo, Louis G. Tassinary, and Gary G. Berntson (eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology, 85–119, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federmeier, Kara D. 2007. Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology 44(4). 491–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, Kara D., and Sarah Laszlo. 2009. Time for meaning: electrophysiology provides insights into the dynamics of representation and processing in semantic memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 51. 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, Kara D, Edward W Wlotko, Esmerelda De Ochoa-Dewald, and Marta Kutas. 2007. Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research 1146. 75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer-Baum, Simon, Daniel S. Dickson, and Kara D. Federmeier. 2014. Frequency and regularity effects in reading are task dependent: evidence from ERPs. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29(10). 1342–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häikiö, Tuomo, Raymond Bertram, Jukka Hyönä, and Pekka Niemi. 2009. Development of the letter identity span in reading: evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102(2). 167–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawelka, Stefan, Sarah Schuster, Benjamin Gagl, and Florian Hutzler. 2015. On forward inferences of fast and slow readers. An eye movement study. Scientific Reports 5. 8432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, John M., and Fernanda Ferreira. 1990. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16(3). 417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersch, Jolyn, and Sally Andrews. 2012. Lexical quality and reading skill: bottom-up and top-down contributions to sentence processing. Scientific Studies of Reading 16(3). 240–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, Phillip. J., Jonathan Grainger, and Tim O'rourke. 2002. An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14(6). 938–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jegerski, Jill. 2014. Self-paced reading. Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics 20–49.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Timothy R., Jasmine Dixon, Victoria A. McGowan, Stoyan Kurtev, and Kevin B. Paterson. 2016. Fast and slow readers and the effectiveness of the spatial frequency content of text: evidence from reading times and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 42(8). 1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappenman, Emily. S., and Steven J Luck. 2012. ERP components: The ups and downs of brainwave recordings. The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components 1. 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, Walter, and Janice Keenan. 1973. Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology 5(3). 257–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretzschmar, Franziska, Matthias Schlesewsky, and Adrian Staub. 2015. Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41(6). 1648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieber, Magdalena, Katrin D. Bartl-Pokorny, Florian B. Pokorny, Christa Einspieler, Andrea Langmann, Christof Körner, Terje Falck-Ytter, and Peter B. Marschik. 2016. The relation between reading skills and eye movement patterns in adolescent readers: evidence from a regular orthography. PloS One 11. e0145934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, Marta, and Kara D Federmeier. 2000. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(12). 463–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, Marta, and Kara D. Federmeier. 2011. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology 62. 621–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, Marta, and Steven A. Hillyard. 1984. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307(5947). 161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, Sarah, and Kara D. Federmeier. 2009. A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language 61(3). 326–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, Sarah, and Kara D. Federmeier. 2014. Never seem to find the time: evaluating the physiological time course of visual word recognition with regression analysis of single-item event-related potentials. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29(5). 642–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, Ellen F., Colin Phillips, and David Poeppel. 2008. A cortical network for semantics:(de) constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9(12). 920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoux, Kerry, Peter C. Gordon, C. Christine Camblin, and Tamara Y. Swaab. 2007. Coreference and lexical repetition: mechanisms of discourse integration. Memory & Cognition 35(4). 801–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinenger, Mallorie, and Keith Rayner. 2017. What we know about skilled, beginning, and older readers from monitoring their eye movements. Reading Comprehension in Educational Settings 16. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Levenshtein, Vladimir I. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10. 707–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Calderon, Javier, and Steven J. Luck. 2014. ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8. 213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch, Robert F., and Jerome L. Myers. 1990. Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16(1). 149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Don C. 2004. On-line methods in language processing: Introduction and historical review. In Manuel Carreiras and Charles Clifton, Jr. (eds) The On-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and Beyond, 15–32. New York: Psychological Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, John D., and Kelly Burke. 2003. Activation and encoding of predictive inferences: The role of reading skill. Discourse Processes 35(2). 81–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, Shukhan, Brennan R. Payne, Allison A. Steen, Elizabeth A. Stine-Morrow, and Kara D. Federmeier. 2017. Use of contextual information and prediction by struggling adult readers: evidence from reading times and event-related potentials. Scientific Studies of Reading 21(5). 359–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, Mante S., and Joe J. van Berkum. 2006. When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(7). 1098–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, Brennan R., and Kara D. Federmeier. 2017. Pace yourself: Intraindividual variability in context use revealed by self-paced event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 29(5). 837–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, Brennan R., and Kara D. Federmeier. 2018. Contextual constraints on lexico-semantic processing in aging: evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials. Brain Research 1687. 117–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, Brennan R., Xuefei Gao, Soo Rim Noh, Carolyn Jane Anderson, and Elizabeth Stine-Morrow. 2012. The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: evidence for efficiency and reserve. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 19(1-2). 122–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, Brennan R., Sarah Grison, Xuefei Gao, Kiel Christianson, Daniel G. Morrow, and Elizabeth AL Stine-Morrow. 2014. Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities. Cognition 130. 157–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, Brennan R., Chia-lin Lee, and Kara D. Federmeier. 2015. Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 52(11). 1456–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, Brennan R., and Jack W Silcox. 2019. Aging, context processing, and comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 71. 215–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, Brennan R., and Elizabeth AL Stine-Morrow. 2014. Risk for mild cognitive impairment is associated with semantic integration deficits in sentence processing and memory. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 71. 243–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, Charles. 2007. Reading ability: lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading 11(4). 357–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, Kristopher J., Patrick J. Curran, and Daniel J. Bauer. 2006. Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, Keith, Timothy J. Slattery, and Nethalie N. Bélanger. 2010. Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17(6). 834–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommers, Joost, and Kara D. Federmeier. 2017. Tracking language through time using electrophysiological methods. In Annette M. B. de Groot and Peter Hagoort (eds.), Research methods in psycholinguistics: A practical guide, 247–65. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rugg, Michael D. 1990. Event-related potentials dissociate repetition effects of high and low frequency words. Memory and Cognition 18. 367–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slattery, Timothy J., and Mark Yates. 2018. Word skipping: effects of word length, predictability, spelling and reading skill. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71(1). 250–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. George, Marie, Suzanne Mannes, and James E. Hoffman. 1994. Global semantic expectancy and language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 6(1). 70–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen-Baker, Allison A., Shukhan Ng, Brennan R. Payne, Carolyn J. Anderson, Kara D. Federmeier, and Elizabeth AL Stine-Morrow. 2017 The effects of context on processing words during sentence reading among adults varying in age and literacy skill. Psychology and Aging 32. 460–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaab, Tamara Y., C. Christine Camblin, and Peter C. Gordon. 2004. Electrophysiological evidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(5). 715–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Wilson. L. 1953. “Cloze procedure”: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Bulletin 30(4). 415–33.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, Geoffrey, Alison Hubbard, and Howard Wilkinson. 1990. Eye fixations predict reading comprehension: The relationships between reading skill, reading speed, and visual inspection. Language and Speech 33(1). 69–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, Cyma. 1993. A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes 8. 485–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, Cyma, and Marta Kutas. 1990. Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition 18(4). 380–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, Cyma, and Marta Kutas. 1991. Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open-and closed-class words. Memory & Cognition 19(1). 95–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, Cyma, and Barbara J. Luka. 2006. Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies. Brain and Language 97(3). 279–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldre, Aaron, and Sally Andrews. 2014. Lexical quality and eye movements: individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67. 703–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara-Martínez, Marta, and Tamara Y Swaab. 2012. Orthographic neighborhood effects as a function of word frequency: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology 49(9). 1277–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, Edward W., and Kara D. Federmeier. 2012. So that's what you meant! event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning. NeuroImage 62(1). 356–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, Edward W., and Kara D. Federmeier. 2015. Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading. Cortex 68. 20–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, Tal, David Balota, and Melvin Yap. 2008. Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15(5). 971–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar