Writing in the Sciences and Humanities: A Clause-Complex Perspective

References

• Armstrong, Elizabeth M. 1992. “Clause Complex Relations in Aphasic Discourse: A Longitudinal Case Study.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 7: 261–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dressen-Hammouda, Dacia. 2014. “Measuring the Voice of Disciplinarity in Scientific Writing: A Longitudinal Exploration of Experienced Writers in Geology.” English for Specific Purposes 34: 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrokhi, Farahman, and Sepideh Ghandkaran-Shotorban. 2014. “Clause Complexity in Applied Linguistics Research Article Abstracts by Native and Non-Native English Writers: Taxis, Expansion and Projection.” Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning 13: 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Gopen, George, and Judith Swan. 1990. “The Science of Scientific Writing.” American Scientist. August 7, 2018. https://www.americanscientist.org/blog/the-long-view/the-science-of-scientific-writing.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, Sidney, and Gerald Nelson. 1995. “Clause Relationships in Spoken and Written English.” Functions of Language 2: 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1973. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1998. “Things and Relations: Regrammaticising Experience as Technical Knowledge.” In Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, edited by James R. Martin, and Robert Veel, 185–237. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1999. “The Grammatical Construction of Scientific Knowledge: The Framing of the English Clause.” In Incommensurability and Translation: Kuhnian Perspectives on Scientific Communication and Theory Change, edited by Rema Rossini Favretti, Giorgio Sandri, and Roberto Scazzieri, 85–116. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and James R. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and Jonathan J. Webster. 2004. The Language of Science. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, James, Eric Sotto, and Claire Fox. 2004. “Clarity Across the Disciplines: An Analysis of Texts in the Sciences, Social Sciences, and Arts and Humanities.” Science Communication 26: 188–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayot, Eric. 2014. The Elements of Academic Style: Writing for the Humanities. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Humanities vs. Sciences. 2019. 19 April 2019. https://www.rlf.org.uk/resources/scientific-writing/.
   Google Scholar
• Koulaidis, Vasilis, Kostas Dimopoulos, and Spyridoula Sklaveniti. 2001. “Analysing the Texts of Science and Technology: School Science Textbooks and Daily Press Articles in the Public Domain.” In Learning for the Future: New Worlds, New Literacies, New Learning, New People, edited by Bill Cope, and Mary Kalantzis, 209–241. Melbourne: Common Ground.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, Inju, and Kiseong Park. 2012. “A Study on the English-to-Korean Translations of the Hypotactic vs. Paratactic Clause Complexes in English.” Studies in Linguistics 24: 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arús, and Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla. 2010. Systemic Functional Grammar of Spanish: A Contrastive Study with English. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, Jay L. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Leong, Ping Alvin. 2014. “The Passive Voice in Scientific Writing: The Current Norm in Science Journals.” Journal of Science Communication 13: A03.
   Google Scholar
• Leong, Ping Alvin, and Bee Geok Wee. 2005. “Investigating the Clause Complex: An Analysis of Exposition-Type Essays Written by Secondary School Students in Singapore.” ITL—International Journal of Applied Linguistics 150: 47–76.
   Google Scholar
• Nagar, Revital, and Jonathan Fine. 2013. “Clause Complex Manifestation in Depression.” Text & Talk 33: 595–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt, Christopher, and Guenter Plum. 1988. “Probabilities in a Systemic-Functional Grammar: The Clause Complex in English.” In New Developments in Systemic Linguistics, Volume 2: Theory and Application, edited by Robin P. Fawcett, and David Young, 6–38. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Randaccio, Monica. 2004. “Language Change in Scientific Discourse.” Journal of Science Communication 3: A01.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, Danica. 2014. Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-Native Scientific Writing: Applying a Corpus-Based Study to Language Teaching. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Scimago Journal and Country Rank. 2016. 3 February 2017. http://www.scimagojr.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Sellami-Baklouti, Akila. 2011. “The Impact of Genre and Disciplinary Differences on Structural Choice: Taxis in Research Article Abstracts.” Text & Talk 31: 503–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkman, Ruth. 2013. “Rigorous and Precise Thinking.” Inside Higher Ed. 18 July 2018. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/01/17/essay-combined-writing-and-mathematics-course.
   Google Scholar
• Strunkyte, Gintare, and Egle Jurkunaite. 2008. Written Academic Discourse: Lexical Bundles in Humanities and Natural Sciences. Lithuania: Vilnius University.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, Anna. 2011. “Defining ‘the Humanities’.” Culture & Psychology 17: 31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyke, Tom. 2015. “Is Science Becoming too Hard Even for Scientists? Experts Worry Academic Papers are Now so Unintelligible that No One Can Read Them.” Daily Mail. August 8, 2018. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3223513/Is-science-hard-scientists-Experts-worry-academic-papers-unintelligible-NO-ONE-read-them.html.
   Google Scholar