deixis in the Dagaare Nominal Group: Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Perspectives

References

• Abbott, Barbara. 1995. “Some Remarks on Specificity.” Linguistic Inquiry 26 (2): 341–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abubakar, Hasiyatu, and Samuel A. Issah. 2020. “The Syntax of Weak and Strong Pronouns in Dagbani and Kusaal.” Studia Linguistica 74 (3): 584–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abubakari, Hasiyatu. 2017. “Ideophones in Kusaal.” Journal of West African Languages 44 (1): 42–57.
   Google Scholar
• Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2007. “Typological Distinctions in Word-Formation.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description (Vol. III): Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 2nd ed., edited by Timothy Shopen, 1–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ameka, Felix K. 2001. “Ideophones and the Nature of the Adjective Word Class in Ewe.” In Ideophones, edited by F. K. Erhard Voeltz and Christa Kilian-Hatz, 25–48. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Amfo, N. A. Appiah. 2018. “The Encoding of Information Structure in African languages.” In The Routledge Handbook of African linguistics, edited by Augustine Agwuele and Adams Bodomo, 243–261. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Mark C., and Bleu G. Gondo. 2020. “Possession and Nominalization in Dan: Evidence for a General Theory of Categories.” Glossa 5 (1): 39. 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bemile, Sebastian. 2000. “Promotion of Ghanaian Languages and Its Impact on National Unity: The Dagara Language Case.” In Ethnicity in Ghana: The Limits of Invention, edited by Carola Lentz and Paul Nugent, 204–225. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bodomo, Adams. 1997. The Structure of Dagaare. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bodomo, Adams, and Ken Hiraiwa. 2004. “Relativization in Dagaare.” Journal of Dagaare Studies 4: 54–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie [Theory of Language]. Jena: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Delplanque, Alan. 2012. Le Dagara-Lobr [Dagaare-Lobr]. Paris: Peeters.
   Google Scholar
• Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function and Grammaticalisation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Diessel, Holger. 2013. “Distance Contrasts in Demonstratives.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, edited by Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology. Accessed January 17, 2017. http://wals.info/chapter/41.
   Google Scholar
• Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. “Noun Phrase Structure.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description (2nd ed.): Volume II: Complex Constructions, edited by Timothy Shopen, 151–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryer, Matthew S. 2013a. “Order of Genitive and Noun.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, edited by Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology. Accessed May 3, 2020. http://wals.info/chapter/86.
   Google Scholar
• Dryer, Matthew S. 2013b. “Order of Demonstrative and Noun.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, edited by Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology. Accessed May 3, 2020. http://wals.info/chapter/86.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrich, Veronika. 1982. “Da and the System of Spatial Deixis in German.” In Here and There: Cross-Linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration, edited by Jürgen Weissenborn and Wolfgang Klein, 44–63. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Enç, Mürvet. 1991. “The Semantics of Specificity.” Linguistic Inquiry 22 (1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goody, Jack. 1972. The Myth of the Bagre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian M. I. M Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1996. “Demonstratives in Narrative Discourse: A Taxonomy of Universal Uses.” In Studies in Anaphora, edited by Barbara A. Fox, 205–254. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ionin, Tania. 2006. “This is Definitely Specific: Specificity and Definiteness in Article Systems.” Natural Language Semantics 14 (2): 175–234.
   Google Scholar
• Issah, Samuel A. 2013. “The Structure of the Dagbani Simple Noun Phrase.” South African Journal of African Languages 33 (2): 203–212.
   Google Scholar
• Kolkmann, Julia, and Ingrid L. Falkum. 2020. “The Pragmatics of Possession: A Corpus Study of English Prenominal Possessives.” Journal of Pragmatics 157: 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog, and Seongha Rhee. 2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Stephen C. 2017a. “Introduction: Demonstratives: Patterns in Diversity.” In Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, edited by Stephen C. Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael J. Dunn, Nick J. Enfield, and Sérgio Meira, 1–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Stephen C. 2017b. “Yélî Dnye: Demonstratives in the Language of Rossel Island, Papua New Guinea.” In Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, edited by Stephen C. Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael J. Dunn, Nick J. Enfield, and Sérgio Meira, 318–342. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, Christopher. 1986. “The Syntax of English Genitive Constructions.” Journal of Linguistics 22 (1): 123–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macrae, Andrea. 2019. Discourse Deixis in Metafiction: The Language of Metanarration, Metalepsis and Disnarration. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Makeeva, Nadezhda, and Andrey Shluinsky. 2020. “Numerals in Akebu.” Open Linguistics 6: 344–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 1983. “Participant Identification in English, Tagalog and Kâte.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 3: 45–74.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 2013. Systemic Functional Grammar: A Next Step into the Theory – Axial Relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 2016. “Meaning Matters: A Short History of Systemic Functional Linguistics.” WORD 62: 35–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2016.1141939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 1995. Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 2007. “The ‘Architecture’ of Language According to Systemic Functional Theory: Developments Since the 1970s.” In Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, Vol. 2, edited by Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen, and Jonathan J. Webster, 505–562. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., and M. A. K. Halliday. 2009. Systemic Functional Grammar: A First Step into the Theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miehe, Gudrun. 2012. “Dagara Cluster.” In Noun Class Systems in Gur Languages. Vol. 2, edited by Gudrun Miehe, Brigitte Reineke, and Kerstin Winkelmann, 250–268. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Miehe, Gudrun, Brigitte Reineke, and Kerstin Winkelmann, eds. 2012. Noun Class Systems in Gur Languages (Vol. 2): North Central Gur languages (Gur Monographs 11). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mwinlaaru, Isaac N. 2017. “A Systemic Functional Description of the Grammar of Dagaare.” PhD thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
   Google Scholar
• Mwinlaaru, Isaac N., and Foong Ha Yap. 2021. “Syntactic Position, Qualitative Features and Extended Demonstrative Functions: Dagaare Distal Demonstratives nὲ and lὲ in Interactional Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.033.
   Google Scholar
• Omer, Preminger. 2020. “Functional Structure in the Noun Phrase: Revisiting Hebrews Nominals.” Glossa 5 (1): 68. 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plank, Frans. 1992. “Possessives and the Distinction Between Determiners and Modifiers (with Special Reference to German).” Journal of Linguistics 28: 453–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijkhoff, Jan. 2004. The Noun Phrase. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rybarczyk, Magdalena. 2015. Demonstratives and Possessives with Attitude: An Intersubjectively-Oriented Empirical Study. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schlenker, Philippe. 2020. “Inside Out: A Note on the Hierarchical Update of Nominal Modifiers.” Glossa 5 (1): 60. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, Erwin M. 1995. “Narrative Comprehension and the Role of Deictic Shift Theory.” In Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, edited by Judith F. Duchan, Gail A. Bruder, and Lynne E. Hewitt, 3–18. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Somé, Joachim D. 2004. “Dagara Orthography.” Journal of Dagaare Studies 4: 15–51.
   Google Scholar
• von Heusinger, Klaus. 2002. “Specificity and Definiteness in Sentence and Discourse Structure.” Journal of Semantics 19: 245–274.
   Google Scholar
• Weissenborn, Jürgen, and Wolfgang Klein. 1982. “Introduction.” In Here and There: Cross-Linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration, edited by Jürgen Weissenborn and Wolfgang Klein, 1–12. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar