100
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Nominal Group in Khorchin Mongolian: A Systemic Functional Perspective

ORCID Icon

References

  • Bayancogtu. 2002. Horcin aman ayalgun u sodulul [A Study of Khorchin Dialect]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University Press.
  • Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.
  • Budd, Peter. 2004. “Issues in Khorchin Mongolian Morphology: A Study of Case Markers.” MA dissertation, University of London.
  • Chaganhada. 1995. Mengguyu ke’erqin tuyu yanjiu [A Study of Khorchin Dialect]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
  • Dixon, Robert M.W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory (Vol II: Grammatical Topics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Doran, Y. J., and J. R. Martin. 2021. “Field Relations: Understanding Scientific Explanations.” In Teaching Science: Knowledge, Language, Pedagogy, edited by Karl Maton, J. R. Martin, and Y. J. Doran, 105–133. London/New York: Routledge.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1987. “Spoken and Written Modes of Meaning.” In Comprehending Oral and Written Language, edited by Rosalind Horowitz, and S. Jay Samuels, 55–82. London: Academic Press Inc.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London: Arnold.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. 2008. Complementarities in Language. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
  • Hao, Jing. 2020a. Analyzing Scientific Discourse from a Systemic Functional Perspective: A Framework for Exploring Knowledge Building in Biology. London: Routledge.
  • Hao, Jing. 2020b. “Nominalizations in Scientific English: A Tristratal Perspective.” Functions of Language 27 (2): 143–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16055.hao.
  • Hood, Susan, and Dongbing Zhang. 2020. “GRADUATION in Play with Other Systems of Meaning in The Enactment of Interpersonal Relations.” Waiguoyu [Journal of Foreign Languages] 43 (6): 21–41.
  • Janhunen, Juha A. 2012. Mongolian. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Martin, J. R. 1991. “Nominalization in Science and Humanities: Distilling Knowledge and Scaffolding Text.” In Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses, edited by Eija Ventola, 307–338. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Martin, J. R. 1993. “Technology, Bureaucracy and Schooling: Discursive Resources and Control.” Cultural Dynamics 6 (1–2): 84–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/092137409300600104.
  • Martin, J. R. 1996. “Types of Structure: Deconstructing Notions of Constituency in Clause and Text.” In Computational and Conversational Discourse, edited by Eduard H. Hovy, and Donia R. Scott, 39–66. Berlin: Springer.
  • Martin, J. R., and Gi-Hyun Shin. 2021. “Korean Nominal Groups: System and Structure.” WORD 67 (3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2021.1957549.
  • Martin, J. R., Pin Wang, and Yongsheng Zhu. 2013. Systemic Functional Grammar: A Next Step into the Theory – Axial Relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
  • Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 2004. “Descriptive Motifs and Generalizations.” In Language Typology: A Functional Perspective, edited by Alice Caffarel, J. R. Martin, and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen, 537–673. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Svantesson, Jan-Olof, Anna Tsendina, Anastasia Mukhanova Karlsson, and Vivan Franzén. 2005. The Phonology of Mongolian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • von Heusinger, Klaus, Udo Klein, and Dolgor Guntsetseg. 2011. “The Case of Accusative Embedded Subjects in Mongolian.” Lingua 121: 48–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.006.
  • Wang, Penglin. 1983. “Guanyu menggu yuzu “ge fujia chengfen” de wenti [On Case Marking in Mongolic Languages].” Minority Languages of China (1): 41–64.
  • Zhang, Dongbing. 2020. “Dialogic Positioning in Khorchin Mongolian: The Temporal and Spatial Dimensions of Propositional Engagement in Conversations.” Lingua 244: 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102920.
  • Zhang, Dongbing. 2021. “Tense in Khorchin Mongolian: An Interpersonal Perspective.” Language Sciences 85: 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101371.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.