High Performance Liquid Chromatography as a valuable tool for geoforensic soil analysis

References

• Ritz K, Dawson L, Miller D, editors. Criminal and environmental soil forensics. Netherlands: Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ruffell A, McKinley J. Geoforensics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2008.10.1002/9780470758854
   Google Scholar
• Murray RC. Forensic geology: yesterday, today and tomorrow. In: Pye K, Croft DJ, editors. Forensic geoscience: principles, techniques and applications, geological society. London: The Geological Society; 2004; p. 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Murray RC. Evidence from the earth forensic geology and criminal investigation. Missoula (MT): Mountain Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan RM, Bull PA. The philosophy, nature and practice of forensic sediment analysis. Prog Phys Geog. 2007;31:43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RM, Gibson A, Little M, Hicks L, Dunkerley S, Bull PA The preservation of quartz grain surface textures following vehicle fire and their use in forensic enquiry. Sci Justice. 2008;48(3):133–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RM, French JC, O’Donnell L, Bull PA. The reincorporation and redistribution of trace geoforensic particulates on clothing: an introductory study. Sci Justice. 2010;50(4):195–199.10.1016/j.scijus.2010.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saferstein R. Criminalistics: an introduction to forensic science. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Stam M. Soil as significant evidence in a sexual assault/attempted homicide case. In: Pye K, Croft DJ, editors. Forensic geoscience: principles, techniques and applications, geological society. London: The Geological Society; 2004, p. 295–299.
   Google Scholar
• Brown AG, Smith A, Elmhurst O. The combined use of pollen and soil analyses in a search and subsequent murder investigation. J. Forensic Sci. 2002;47:614–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi G. The contribution of forensic geology and other trace evidence analysis to the investigation of the killing of Italian prime minister Aldo Moro. J Forensic Sci. 1999;44:634–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous, Forensic examination of soil evidence. In: Tontarski RE, Peel HW, editors. Proceedings of the 13th Interpol Forensic Science Symposium, 2001 October 16-19, Interpol. Lyon; 2001. p. D1 175–D1 191.
   Google Scholar
• Sugita R, Suzuki S, Katsumata Y. Forensic geology- a review: 2004-2007. In: Nic Daeid N, editors. 15th International Forensic Science Symposium Interpol – Lyon, 23 - 26 October 2007, Interpol. Lyon; 2007. p. 81–85.
   Google Scholar
• Sugita R, Suzuki S, Katsumata Y Forensic geology: review 2007 to 2009. In: Nic Daeid N, editors. 16th International Forensic Science Symposium Interpol – Lyon, 5th - 8th October 2010, Interpol. Lyon; 2010. p. 201–220
   Google Scholar
• Morgan RM, Bull PA. The use of grain size distribution analysis of sediments and soils in forensic enquiry. Sci Justice. 2007;47:125–135.10.1016/j.scijus.2007.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RM, Bull PA. Forensic geoscience and crime detection. Identification, interpretation and presentation in forensic geoscience. Minerva Medicolegale. 2007;127: 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Bull PA, Morgan RM. Freudiger-Bonzon J. A critique of the present use of some geochemical techniques in geoforensic analysis, 2-3. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;178:e35–e40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RM, Wiltshire P, Parker A, Bull PA. The role of forensic geoscience in wildlife crime detection. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;162:152–162.10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RM, Bull PA. Data interpretation in forensic sediment and soil geochemistry. Environ Forensics. 2006;7:325–334.10.1080/15275920600996248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommarito CR, Sturdevant AB, Szymanski DW. Analysis of forensic soil samples via high-performance liquid chromatography and ion chromatography. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52:24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuland DJ, Trinler WA. An investigation of the potential of high performance liquid chromatography for the comparison of soil samples. Forensic Sci Int. 1981;18:201–208.10.1016/0379-0738(81)90161-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel JA, Precord C. The analysis of soil samples by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography using wavelength ratioing. J Forensic Sci. 1995;30:511–525.
   Google Scholar
• Croft DJ, Pye K. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope variations in soils: forensic applications. In: Croft DJ, Pye K, editors. Forensic geoscience: techniques, principles and applications: geological society. London: The Geological Society; 2004; p. 257–267.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson LA, Hillier SS. Measurement of soil characteristics for forensic applications. Surf Interface Anal. 2010;42:363–377.10.1002/sia.v42:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull PA, Parker A, Morgan RM. The forensic analysis of soils and sediment taken from the cast of a footprint. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;162:6–12.10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlins BG, Cave M. Multi-element soil geochemical signatures. In: Pye K, Croft DJ, editors. Forensic geoscience: principles, techniques and applications, geological society. London: The Geological Society; 2004; p. 197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan RM, Cohen J, McGookin I, Murly-Gotto JO Connor R, Muress S, Freudiger-Bonzon J, Bull PA. The relevance of the evolution of experimental studies for the interpretation and evaluation of some trace physical evidence. Sci Justice. 2009;49:277–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergslien E. An introduction to forensic geoscience. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick RW. Forensic comparison of soils. In: Tibbett M, Carter DO, editors. Soil analysis in forensic taphonomy. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008. p. 1–28.10.1201/9781420069921
   Google Scholar
• Minasny B, McBratney AB, Salvador-Blanes S. Quantitative models for pedogenesis — a review. Geoderma. 2008;144:140–157.10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins DW. The role of organisms in terrestrial decomposition. In: Tibbett M, Carter DO, editors. Soil analysis in forensic taphonomy. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008. p. 53–66.10.1201/9781420069921
   Google Scholar
• Gallop A, Stockdale R. Trace and contact evidence. In: White P, editor. Crime scene to court the essentials of forensic science. 1st ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 1998. p. 47–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad UK, Rajendran SAbu Hassan S. Forensic analysis of explosive residues from hand swabs, Malaysian. J Anal Sci.. 2008;12:25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tarvin M1, McCord B, Mount K, Miller ML Analysis of hydrogen peroxide field samples by HPLC/FD and HPLC/ED, et al. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;209: 166–172.10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ide R. Fire investigation. In: White P, editor. Crime scene to court the essentials of forensic science. 1st ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 1998. p. 133–158.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson B. Alcohol in Blood. In: Siegel JA, editor. Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. Oxford: Elsevier; 2000. p. 74–80.10.1006/rwfs.2000.0402
   Google Scholar
• Pragst F, Balikova MA. State of the art in hair analysis for detection of drug and alcohol abuse. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;370:17–49.10.1016/j.cca.2006.02.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzolato TM, Lopez de Alda MJ, Barcelo D. LC-based analysis of drugs of abuse and their metabolites in urine. TrAC-Trends Anal Chem. 2007;26:609–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaillard Y1, Breuil R, Doche C, Romeuf L, Lemeur C,Prevosto JM, Fanton L Detection of amitriptyline, nortriptyline and bromazepam in liver, csf and hair in the homicidal poisoning of a one month old girl autopsied eight months after death. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;207:e16–e18.10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuland DJ, Trinler WA, Farmer MD. Comparison of soil samples by high performance liquid chromatography augmented by absorbance ratioing. Forensic Sci Int. 1992;52:131–142.10.1016/0379-0738(92)90101-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell AJ1, Morgan RM, Griffin LD, Bull PA, Marshall JR, Graham G Automated texture recognition of quartz sand grains for forensic applications. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57:1285–1289.10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02126.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull PA, Morgan RM. Sediment fingerprints: a forensic technique using quartz sand grains. Sci Justice. 2006;46:107–124.10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71581-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye K. Geological and soil evidence: forensic applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons K Soil sampling SESDPROC-300-R3. United States Environmental Protection Agency [ Online], 21 August 2014, [cited 2016 Apr 15]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/quality/quality-system-and-technical-procedures-sesd-field-branches
   Google Scholar
• Larson SA Developing a high throughput protocol for using soil molecular biology as trace evidence. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Digital Commons [ Online], 01 May 2012, [cited 2015 Dec 08]. Available from: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=biochemdiss
   Google Scholar
• ICH. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, ICH [Online]. November 2005. [Cited 2016 Apr 15]. Available from: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q2_R1/Step4/Q2_R1__Guideline.pdf
   Google Scholar