Managing the forensic examination of human hairs in contemporary forensic practice

References

• Commission of inquiry into certain aspects of the trial and conviction of James Driskell. Inquiry Proceedings. Volume 24; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas DM. Report on forensic science matters to the commission of inquiry Re: James Driskell. Appendix G in ‘Report of The Commission of Inquiry into Certain Aspects of the Trial and Conviction of James Driskell; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudette BD. Evidential value of hair examination. Chapter 7 In: Robertson J, editor. Forensic examination of hair. London: Taylor and Francis; 1999. p. 243–260.
   Google Scholar
• Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Pub. The National Academies Press; 2009. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12589/strengthening-forensic-science-in-the-united-states-a-path-forward
   Google Scholar
• Report to the president. forensic science in criminal courts: ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods. Executive Office of the President. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Justice Proposed Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports for the Forensic Hair Examination Discipline, 2016, www.justice.gov/dag/file/877736/download and Supporting Documentation for Department of Justice Proposed Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports for the Forensic Hair Examination Discipline, 2016, www.justice.gov/dag/file/877741/download
   Google Scholar
• Houck MM, Budowle B. Correlation of microscopic and mitochondrial DNA hair comparisons. J Forens Sci. 2002;47:964–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FBI/DoJ microscopic hair comparison analysis review. Available from: www.fbi.gov/services/laboratory/scientific-analysis/fbidoj-microscopic-hair-comparison-analysis-review
   Google Scholar
• Quote by Winston S. Churchill. www.goodreads.com/quotes/7075580-the-longer-you-look-back-the-farther-you-can-look
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Working Group on Materials Analysis. Forensic human hair examination guidelines. Forensic Science Communications. 2005;7.
   Google Scholar
• Glaister J. A Study of hairs and wools belonging to the mammalian group of animals, including a special study of human hair, considered from the medico-legal aspects. Cairo: MISR Press; 1931.
   Google Scholar
• Smith S. Mostly murder. An autobiography. London: Harrap; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Kind SS, Owens GW. Assessment of information content gained from the microscopical comparison of hair samples. J Forens Sci Soc. 1977;16:235–239.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudette BD, Keeping ES. An attempt at determining probabilities in human scalp hair comparison. J Forens Sci. 1974;19:599–606.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaudette BD. Some further thoughts on probabilities and human hair comparisons. J Forens Sci. 1976;21:514–517.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wickenheiser RA, Hepworth DG. Further evaluation of probabilities in human scalp hair comparisons. J Forens Sci. 1990;35:1323–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett PD, Ogle RR. Probabilities and human hair comparison. J Forens Sci. 1982;27:272–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesterberg O. History of electrophoretic methods. J Chrom A. 1989;480:3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righetti PG. Electrophoresis: the march of pennies, the march of dimes. J Chrom A. 2005;1079:24–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiselius A. A new apparatus for electrophoretic analysis of colloidal mixtures. Trans Faraday Soc. 1937;33:524–531.
   Google Scholar
• Murch RS, Budowle B. Applications of isoelectric focusing in forensic serology. J Forens Sci. 1986;31:869–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton ME, Sutton JG. Multiple enzyme typing of sheath cells associated with the root of a single human head hair. J Forens Sci Soc. 1982;22:203–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee LD, Ludwig K, Baden HP. Matrix proteins of human hair as a tool to identify individuals. Forens Sci. 1978;11:115–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marshall RC, Gillespie JM, Klement V. Methods and future prospects for forensic identification of hairs by electrophoresis. J Forens Sci Soc. 1985;25:57–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker GJ, Leppert T, Anex DS, Hilmer JK, Matsunami N, Baird L, Stevens J, Parsawar K, Durbin-Johnson BP, Rocke DM, et al. Demonstration of protein-based human identification using the hair shaft proteome. PlosOne. 2016. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160653.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken CGG, Robertson J. The value of microscopic features in the examination of human head hairs: statistical analysis of questionnaire returns. J Forens Sci. 1986;31:546–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson J, Aitken CGG. The value of microscopic features in the examination of human head hairs: analysis of comments contained in questionnaire returns. J Forens Sci. 1986;31:563–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken CGG, Robertson J. Contribution to the discussion of probabilities and human hair comparisons. J Forens Sci. 1987;32:684–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson J. An appraisal of the use of microscopic data in the examination of human head hair. J Forens Sci Soc. 1982;22:390–395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proceedings of the international symposium in forensic hair comparisons. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 1985. Available from: www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/116592NCJRS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gill P, Werrett DJ. Exclusion of a man charged with murder by DNA fingerprinting. Forens Sci Int. 1987;35:145–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill P. Misleading DNA evidence. Reasons for miscarriages of justice. London: Elsevier, Academic Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gill P. Application of low copy number DNA profiling. Croat Med J. 2001;42:229–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent F. Report: inquiry into the circumstances that led to the conviction of Mr. Farah Abdulkadir Jama. 2010. Available from: http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/papers/govpub/VPARL2006-10No301.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robertson J. Forensic and microscopic examination of human hair. In:Robertson J, editor. Forensic examination of hair. London: Taylor and Francis. Chapter 2; 1999. p. 79–154.
   Google Scholar
• Roux C, Talbot-Wright B, Robertson J, Crispino F, Ribaux O. The end of the (forensic science) world as we know it? The example of trace evidence. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2015;370:20140260. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dachs J, McNaught JG, Robertson J. The persistence of human scalp hair on clothing fabrics. For Sci Int. 2003;138:27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cook R, Evett I, Jackson G, Jones P, Lambert J. A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework. Sci Justice. 1998;38:231–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edson J, Brooks EM, McLaren C, Robertson J, McNevin D, Cooper A, Austin JJ. A quantitative assessment of a reliable screening technique for the STR analysis of telogen hair roots. For Sci Int Genet. 2013;7:180–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks E, Cullen M, Sztydna J, Walsh SJ. Nuclear staining of telogen hair roots contributes to successful forensic nDNA analysis. Aust J Forens Sci. 2010;42:115–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines A, Linacre A. A rapid screening method using DNA binding dyes to determine whether hair follicles have sufficient DNA for successful profiling. Forens Sci Int. 2016;262:190–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNevin D, Edson J, Robertson J, Austin JJ. Reduced reaction volumes and increased Taq DNA polymerase concentration improve STR profiling outcomes from a real-world low template DNA source: telogen hairs. Forens Sci Med Pathol. 2015;11:326–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottens R, Taylor D, Abarno D, Linacre A. Successful direct amplification of nuclear markers from a single hair follicle. Forens Sci Med Pathol. 2013;2:238–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNevin D, Wilson-Wilde L, Robertson J, Kyd J, Lennard C. Short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping of keratinised hair. Part 2. An optimized genomic DNA extraction procedure reveals donor dependence of STR profiles. Forens Sci Int. 2005;153;247–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton T, Dimick G, Higgins B, Lindstrom L, Nelson K. Forensic mitochondrial DNA analysis of 691 casework hairs. J Forens Sci. 2005;50:73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton T, Dimick G, Higgins B, Yon M, Holland C. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of 114 hairs measuring less than 1 cm from a 19-year-old homicide. Inves Genetics. 2012;3:12. Available from: https://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/3/1/12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melton T, Holland C, Holland M. Forensic mitochondrial DNA analysis: current practice and future potential. Forens Sci Rev. 2012;24:101–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marx V. Biology: the big challenges of big data. Nature. 2013;498:255–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson J, editor. Forensic examination of hair. London: Taylor and Francis; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzarelli D, Vanin S, Gibelli D, Maistrello L, Porta D, Rizzi A, Cattaneo C. Splitting hairs: differentiating between entomological activity, taphonomy, and sharp force trauma on hair. Forens Sci Med Pathol. 2015;11:104–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokopec M, Glosová L, Ubelaker DH. Change in hair pigmentation in children from birth to 5 years in a central European population (longitudinal study). Forens Sci Comm. 2000;2:3.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin DJ, Hordinsky M, Bernard BA. Hair pigmentation: a research update. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2005;10:275–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sturm R. Molecular genetics of human pigmentation diversity. Hum Mol Gen. 2009;18:R9–R17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin DJ. Aging of the hair follicle pigmentation system. Int J Trich. 2009;1:83–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks E, Comber B, McNaught J, Robertson J. Digital imaging and image analysis applied to numerical applications in forensic hair examination. Sci Justice. 2011;51:28–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dror IE. A hierarchy of expert performance. J App Res Mem Cogn. 2016;5:121–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dror IE, Thompson WC, Meissner CA, Kornfield I, Krane D, Saks M, Risinger M. Context management toolbox: a linear sequential unmasking (LSU) approach for minimizing cognitive bias in forensic decision making. J Forens Sci. 2015;60:1111–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattijssen EJ, Kerkhoff W, Berger CE, Dror IE, Stoel RD. Implementing context information management in forensic casework: Minimizing contextual bias in firearms examination. Sci Just. 2016;56:113–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FBI/DoJ Microscopic hair comparison analysis review. FBI testimony on microscopic hair analysis contained errors in at least 90 percent of cases in ongoing review. [cited 2015 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-testimony-on-microscopic-hair-analysis-contained-errors-in-at-least-90-percent-of-cases-in-ongoing-review
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Preliminary report – Committee of Forensic Hair Comparison. Crime Lab Dig. 1985;12:50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Dror IE. The paradox of human expertise: why experts get it wrong. In: Kapur N, editor. The paradoxical brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Chapter 9, p. 177–188.
   Google Scholar
• Kelty S, Julian R, Robertson J. Professionalism in crime scene examination: the seven key attributes of top crime scene examiners. Forens Sci Pol Man. 2:175–186.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Standard AS 5388.3. Forensic Analysis Part 3: interpretation; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• SWGMAT. Forensic human hair examination guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• SWGMAT. Forensic human hair examination training program.
   Google Scholar