Radiometry versus osteometry in sex assessment: a study of the Cretan radius

References

• Brogdon BG. Forensic aspects of radiology. In: Spitz WU, Spitz DJ, Clark RFR, editors. Spitz and Fisher’s medicolegal investigation of death: guidelines for the application of pathology to crime investigation. 4th ed. Chicago, IL: Springfield; 2006. p. 1092–1135.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger GC, L’Abbé EN, Stull KE. Sex estimation from the long bones of modern South Africans. Int J Legal Med. 2016:1–11. doi:10.1007/s00414-016-1488-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranioti EF, Michalodimitrakis M. Sexual dimorphism of the humerus in contemporary Cretans – a population-specific study and a review of the literature*. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54(5):996–1000. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01103.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curate F, Coelho J, Gonçalves D, Coelho C, Ferreira MT, Navega D, Cunha E. A method for sex estimation using the proximal femur. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:579.e1–579.e7. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley MK, Anderson BE, Tise ML. Postcranial sex estimation criteria for Mexican Hispanics. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60:S27–S31. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranioti EF, Apostol MA. Sexual dimorphism of the tibia in contemporary Greeks, Italians, and Spanish : forensic implications. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(2):357–363. doi:10.1007/s00414-014-1045-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin D, O’Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I. Discriminant function sexing of the mandible of Indigenous South Africans. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;179(1):84.e1–84.e5. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.03.014.
   Google Scholar
• Navega D, Vicente R, Vieira DN, Ross AH, Cunha E. Sex estimation from the tarsal bones in a Portuguese sample: a machine learning approach. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(3):651–659. doi:10.1007/s00414-014-1070-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou VA, Kranioti EF, Joveneaux P, Nathena D, Michalodimitrakis M. Sexual dimorphism of the scapula and the clavicle in a contemporary Greek population: applications in forensic identification. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;217(1–3):231.e1–231.e7. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thali MJ, Viner MD, Brogdon BJ, editors. Brogdon’s forensic radiology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, LLC; 2010.10.1201/b10323
   Google Scholar
• DeSilva R, Flavel A, Franklin D. Estimation of sex from the metric assessment of digital hand radiographs in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;244:314.e1–314.e7. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osipov B, Harvati K, Nathena D, Spanakis K, Karantanas A, Kranioti EF. Sexual dimorphism of the Bony Labyrinth: a new age-independent method. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013;151:290–301. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranioti EF, Nathena D, Michalodimitrakis M. Sex estimation of the Cretan humerus: a digital radiometric study. Int J Legal Med. 2011;125(5):659–667. doi:10.1007/s00414-010-0470-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekizoglu O, Er A, Bozdag M, Akcaoglu M, Can IO, García-Donas JG, Kranioti EF. Sex estimation of the tibia in modern Turkish: a computed tomography study. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2016;23:89–94. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin D, Flavel A, Kuliukas A, Cardini A, Marks MK, Oxnard C, O’Higgins P. Estimation of sex from sternal measurements in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;217(1–3):230.e1–230.e5. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrizbeitia EL. Sex determination with the head of the radius. J Forensic Sci. 1989;34(5):1206–1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman DJ, Bennett KA. Determination of sex from arm bone measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991;84(4):421–426. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330840406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mall G, Hubig M, Büttner A, Kuznik J, Penning R, Graw M. Sex determination and estimation of stature from the long bones of the arm. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;117(1–2):23–30. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00445-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safont S, Malgosa A, Subirà ME. Sex assessment on the basis of long bone circumference. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000;113(3):317–328. doi:10.1002/1096-8644(200011)113:3<317::AID-AJPA4>3.0.CO;2-J.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranioti EF, Tzanakis N. Estimation of sex from the upper limb in modern Cretans with the aid of ROC-analysis: a technical report. Forensic Res Criminol Int J Forensic Res Criminol Int J. 2015;1(12). Available from: http://medcraveonline.com
   Google Scholar
• Kranioti Elena F, Vorniotakis N, Galiatsou C, Im Y, Michalodimitrakis M. Sex identification and software development using digital femoral head radiographs. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;189(1-3):113.e1–7. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin R, Seller K. Lehrbuch Der Anthropologie in Systematischer Darstellund [Textbook of anthropology: A systematic presentation]. München: Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf F. TPSDig 1.08 department of ecology and evolution. Stony Brook, NY: State University; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Slice DE. Morpheus et al., Java Edition. Tallahassee, FL: Department of Scientific Computing, The Florida State University; 2013. Available from: http:/morphlab.sc.fsu.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA. Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr. 1999;82(3):165. doi:10.1017/S0007114599001348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Higgins P, Jones N. Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation. J Anat. 1998;193(2):251–272. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19320251.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen JC, Bruce MF, MacLaughlin SM. Sex determination from the radius in humans. Hum Evol. 1987;2(4):373–378. doi:10.1007/BF02436498.
   Google Scholar
• Baumbach SF, Krusche-Mandl I, Huf W, Mall G, Fialka C. Linear intra-bone geometry dependencies of the radius: radius length determination by maximum distal width. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:947–950. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann U, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Heinecke A, Schmeling A, Schmidt S. Reference study on the time frame for ossification of the distal radius and ulnar epiphyses on the hand radiograph. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;191(1–3):15–18. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.05.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez S, Miguéns X, Rodríguez-Calvo MS, Febrero-Bande M, Muñoz-Barús JI. Estimating adult stature from radiographically determined metatarsal length in a Spanish population. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;226(1–3):297.e1–297.e4. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrovecki V, Mayer D, Slaus M, Strinović DSJ. Prediction of stature based on radiographic measurements of cadaver long bones: a study of the Croatian population. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52:547–552.10.1111/jfo.2007.52.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranioti EF, Vorniotakis N, Galiatsou C, İşcan MY, Michalodimitrakis M. Sex identification and software development using digital femoral head radiographs. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;189(1-3):113.e1–113.e7. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafa EM, El-Elemi AH, El-Beblawy MA. Dawood AE-WA. Adult sex identification using digital radiographs of the proximal epiphysis of the femur at Suez Canal University Hospital in Ismailia, Egypt. Egypt. J Forensic Sci. 2012;2(3):81–88. doi:10.1016/j.ejfs.2012.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Kranioti EF, Bastir M, Sánchez-Meseguer A, Rosas A. Forensic anthropology population data a geometric-morphometric study of the Cretan humerus for sex identification. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;189(1-3):111.e1–8. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar