References
- Fraser H, Stevenson B. ‘The power and persistence of contextual priming: more risks in using police transcripts to aid jurors’ perception of poor quality covert recordings. Int J Evid Proof. 2014;18:205–229.10.1350/ijep.2014.18.3.453
- Ibid.
- Fraser H, Stevenson B, Marks T. Interpretation of a crisis call: persistence of a primed perception of a disputed utterance. Int J Speech Lang Law. 2011;18(2):261–292.
- Thompson WC. What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence?. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2011;43(2–3):123–134.10.1080/00450618.2010.541499
- Ladefoged P, Disner SF. Vowels and consonants: an introduction to the sounds of language. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
- Byrd D, Mintz TH. Discovering speech, words and mind. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.10.1002/9781444319934
- Kreiman J, Sidtis D. Foundations of voice studies. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2011.10.1002/9781444395068
- Fishman CS. Recordings, transcripts, and translations as evidence. Washington Law Rev. 2006;81(3):473–523.
- Miller AE. Jury suggestibility: the misinformation effect and why courts should care about inaccuracies in transcripts that accompany recorded evidence. Law Psychology Rev. 2016;40:363–382.
- French P, Harrison P. Investigative and evidential applications of forensic speech science. In: Heaton-Armstrong A, ed. Witness testimony: psychological, investigative and evidential perspectives. 2006; p. 247–262.
- Lange ND, Thomas RP, Dana J, Dawes RM. Contextual biases in the interpretation of auditory evidence. Law Human Behavior. 2011;35(3):178–187.10.1007/s10979-010-9226-4
- Fraser H. Transcription of indistinct forensic recordings: problems and solutions from the perspective of phonetic science. Language Law/Linguagem e Direito. 2014;1:5–21. http://ler.letras.up.pt/site/default.aspx?qry=id05id1444id2692&sum=sim