Image forgery detection based on physics and pixels: a study

References

• Mushtaq S, Mir AH. Digital image forgeriess and passive image authentication techniques: a survey. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 2014;73(02):15–32.10.14257/ijast
   Google Scholar
• Dilshad M, Ghrera S, Tyagi V. Pixel based image forgery detection: a review. IETE J Edu. 2014;55(1):40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Farid H. Image forgery detection. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2009;26(2):16–25.10.1109/MSP.2008.931079
   Google Scholar
• Patil C. Detection of region duplication forgery in digital images using wavelet and log polar mapping. In International conference on Computational Intelligence and multimedia applications; Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu, India; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mire AV, Dhok S, Mistry N, Porey P. Catalogue of digital image forgery detection techniques, an overview. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Information technology and Mobile Communication, Elsevier-2013; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bayram S, Taha Sencar H, Memon N. An efficient and robust method for detecting copy-move forgery. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing; Taipei; 2009. p. 1053–1056. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2009.4959768
   Google Scholar
• Fridrich J, Soukal D, Lukas J. Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images. Proceedings of Digital Forensic Research Workshop; Cleveland; 2003. p. 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu A, Farid H. “Exposing digital forgeries by detecting duplicated image regions”, Technical Report TR 2004–515. Dartmouth College: Dept. of Computer Science; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Myna MVCPA. Detection of region duplication forgery in digital images using wavelets and polar coordinates. In Proc. of Int. conf. on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications ICCIMA; 2007; 371–377.
   Google Scholar
• Lin H, Wang C, Kao Y. An efficient method for copy move forgery detection. In The Eighth WSEAS International conference on Applied Computer and Applied Computational science; 2009; 250–253.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammed G, Hussain M, Bebis G. Passive copy move image forgery detection using undecimated dyadic wavelet transform. Digital Invest. 2012;9:253–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Guo J. Passive forensics for copy move image forgery using a method based on DCT and SVD. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;233:158–166.10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Pun C-M. A SIFT and local features based integrated method for copy move attack detection in digital images. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Information and Automation; Yinchuan, china; Aug. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Desai JV, Mukherjee S. A fast keypoint based hybrid method for copy move forgery detection. Int J Comput Digital Syst. Apr. 2015;4(2):91–98.10.12785/ijcds/040203
   Google Scholar
• Warbhe dada A, Dharaskar R, Thakare V. A survey on keypoint based copy-paste forgery detection techniques. Procedia Comput Sci. 2016;78:61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bashar M, Noda K, Ohnishi N, Mori K. Exploring duplicated regions in natural images. IEEE Transaction on Image Processing. 2010;99:1. doi:10.1109/TIP.2010.2046599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Wang J, Lian S, Wang Z. A passive image authentication scheme for detecting region duplication forgery with rotation. J Netw Comput App. 2011;34:1557–1565.10.1016/j.jnca.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch G, Shih F, Liao HM. An efficient expending block algorithm for image copy move forgery detection. Inf Sci. 2013;239:253–265.10.1016/j.ins.2013.03.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krichner M. Fast and reliable resampling detection by spectral analysis of fixed linear predictor residue. ACM Multimedia Secur Workshop. 2006;11–20. doi:10.1145/1411328.1411333
   Google Scholar
• Mahdian B, Saic S. Blind authentication using periodic properties of interpolation. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2008;3(3):529–538.10.1109/TIFS.2004.924603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher AC. Detection of linear and cubic interpolation in mpeg compressed images. In Proc. 2nd Canadian conf. Computer and Robust Vision; Canada; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad S, Ramakrishnan K. On resampling detection and its application to image tampering. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Multimedia and Exposition; Toronto, Canada; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Weimin W, Shuozhong W, Zhenjun T. Estimation of rescaling factor and detection of image splicing. In 11th IEEE Int. conf. on Communication Technology; Hangzhou, China; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Xunyu P, Siwei L. Region duplication detection using image feature matching. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2011;5(4):857–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farid H. Image forgery detection: a survey. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2009;26(2):16–25.10.1109/MSP.2008.931079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farid H. www.cs.dartmouth.edu 6. [Online]. [Cited 2016 Jan 21]. Available from: www.cs.dartmouth.edu
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, Farid H. Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of re-sampling. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2005;53(2):758–767.10.1109/TSP.2004.839932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchner M. On resampling detection in re-compressed images. IEEE Workshop Inf Forensics Secur. Dec 2009:21–25. doi:10.1109/WIFS.2009.5386489
   Google Scholar
• Nataraj L, Sarkar A, Manjunath BS. Adding Gaussian noise to ‘denoise’ JPEG for detecting image resizing. 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP); Cairo; 2009. p. 1493–1496. doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2009.5414609
   Google Scholar
• Feng X, Cox I, Doerr G. Normalized energy density-based forensic detection of resampled images. IEEE Trans Multimedia. 2012;14(3):536–545.10.1109/TMM.2012.2191946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subhatra P, Baskar A, Kumar D. Detecting image forgeries using resampling by automatic region of interest. ICTACT J Image Video Process. May 2014;16(2):10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Farid H. Detecting digital forgeries using bispectral analysis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ng T, Chang S. A model for splicing. IEEE Int Conf Image Process, Singapore. 2004;2:1169–1172.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu A, Farid H. Exposing digital forgeries in color filter array interpolated images. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2005;53(10):3948–3959.10.1109/TSP.2005.855406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara P, Bianchi T, Rosa D, Piva A. Image forgery localization via fine-grained analysis of CFA artifacts. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Sec. 2012;7(5): 1566–1577.10.1109/TIFS.2012.2202227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Farid H. Exposing digital forgeries through chromatic aberration. In Proc. of Multimedia and Security Workshop; 2006; 48–55.
   Google Scholar
• Chennamma H, Rangarajan L. Image splicing detection using inherent lens radial distortion. Int J Comput Sci Issues. 2011;7:149–158.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Zheng J. Blind detection of digital forgery image based on the edge width. Intell Sci Intell Data Eng Sci. 2012;7202:546–553.10.1007/978-3-642-31919-8
   Google Scholar
• Ng T, Chang S, Sun Q. Blind detection of photomontage using higher order statistics. In Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems; 2004; 688–691.
   Google Scholar
• Fu D, Shi Y, Su W. Detection of image splicing based on Hilbert-Huang transform and moments of characteristic functions with wavelet decomposition. In Proc. of International Workshop on Digital watermarking; 2006; 177–187.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Shi Y, Su W. Image splicing detection using 2D phase congruency and statistical moments of characteristic function. In Proc. of SPIE Electronics Imaging: Security, Steganography and watermarking of Multimedia Contents; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Cao X, Qu Y, Hou Y, Zhao H, Zhang C. Detecting and extracting the photo composites using planar homography and graph cut. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur. 2010;5(3):544–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhenhua Q, Guooing Q, Jiwu H. Detect digital image splicing with visual cues. In The proc. International workshop on Information Hiding; 2009; 247–261.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Li J, Li S, Wang S. Detecting digital image splicing in chroma spaces. In Proc. International Workshop on Digital Watermarking; 2010; 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Youseph SN, Cherian RR. Pixel and edge based illuminant color estimation for image forgery detection. Elsevier, Int. Conf. on Information and Communication Technologies; 2014; 1635–1642.
   Google Scholar
• Moghaddasi Z, Jalab H, Noor R. SVD based image splicing detection. IEEE Int. Conf. on Information Technology and multimedia; 2014; 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Behrami K, Kot A, Leida L, Haoliang L. Blurred image splicing localization by exposing blur type inconsistency. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. Jan 2015;10(5):999–1009.10.1109/TIFS.2015.2394231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baharami K, Alex C, Leida L, Haoling L. Blurred image splicing localization by exposing blur type inconsistency. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2015;10: 999–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Farid H. Exposing digital forgeries by detecting Inconsistencies in Lighting. In Proc. ACM Multimedia and Security Workshop; 2005; 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdian B, Saic S. A bibliography on blind methods for identifying image forgery. Elsevier, Signal Processing: Image Communication; 2010; 389–399.
   Google Scholar
• Eklundh PAJ. Automatic estimation of the projected light source direction. In Proc. of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern recognition; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Farid H. Exposing digital forgery through specular highlights on the eyes. In Proc. 9th international conference on Information hiding; Saint Malo, France. 2007. p. 311–325, ISBN: 3-540-77369-X, 978-3-540-77369-6.10.1007/978-3-540-77370-2
   Google Scholar
• Johnson MK. Exposing digital forgeries through specular highlights on the eye. US: Dartmouth College; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Farid. Exposing digital forgeries in complex lighting environments. IEEE Trans. Inf Forensics Secur. 2007;3(2):450–461.10.1109/TIFS.2007.903848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee E, Farid H. Exposing digital forgeries from 3-D lighting environments. 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security; Seattle, WA; 2010. p. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/WIFS.2010.5711437
   Google Scholar
• Fan W, Wang K, Cayre F, Xiong Z. 3D lighting based image forgery detection using shape from shading. In 20th European Signal Processing Conference EUSIPCO; 2012; 1777–1781.
   Google Scholar
• Huang R, Smith WP. Shape-from-shading under complex natural illumination. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing; 2011; 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H, Xuanjimg S, Lv Y. Blind identification method for authenticity of infinite light source images. In 5th Int. Conf. on Frontier of Computer Science and Technology; 2010; 131–135.
   Google Scholar
• Yingda L, Xuanjing S, Haipeng C. An improved image blind identification based on inconsistency in light source direction. SuperComputing. 2011;58(1):50–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho TJD, Riess C, Angelopoulou E, Pedrini H. Exposing digital image forgeries by illumination color classification. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2013;8(7):1182–1194.10.1109/TIFS.2013.2265677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho T, Farid H, Kee E. Exposing photo manipulation from user guided 3-D lighting analysis. In Proc. SPIE Symposium on Electronic Imaging; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Farid H. [Online]. [Cited 2016 Jan 21]. Available from: https://kimojohnson.org/publications/envmap/envmap.html
   Google Scholar
• Fang S, Ge H. Detecting image authenticity based on lambert illumination model and shadows. In Proc. of Network Security and Communication Engineering; 2015; 313–316.
   Google Scholar
• Brian JFO, Farid H. Exposing photo manipulation with inconsistent reflections. ACM Trans Graphics. 2012;31(1):4:1–4:11.10.1145/2077341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee E, Brian J, Farid H. Exposing photo manipulation with inconsistent shadows. ACM Trans Graphics. 2013;32(4):1–12. 2810.1145/2487228
   Google Scholar