Australasian forensic science summit 2016: the external future context and the case for change

References

• Ross A. The National Forensic Science Summit: Outcomes. Aust J Forensic Sci. 1995;27(1):2–5. 10.1080/00450619509411317
   Google Scholar
• Evett IW, Werrett DJ, Gill P, Buckleton JS. DNA fingerprinting on trial. Nature. 1989;340:435. 10.1038/340435a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lander ES. DNA fingerprinting on trial. Nature. 1989;339:501–505. 10.1038/339501a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty R, Kidd KK. The utility of DNA typing in forensic work. Science. 1991;254:1735–1739. 10.1126/science.1763323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewontin RC, Hartl DL. Population genetics in forensic DNA typing. Science. 1991;254:1745–1750. 10.1126/science.1845040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimino GD, Metchette K, IsaacS ST, Zhu SZ. More false positive problems. Nature. 1990;345:773–774. 10.1038/345773b0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freckelton I. DNA profiling: forensic science under the microscope. Crim Law J. 1990;14:23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke J. Misapplied science - unreliability in scientific test evidence, part 1. Aust Bar Rev. 1993;10:123–146.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington D. Unacceptable evidence. New Law J. 1993;806–808.
   Google Scholar
• Giannelli PC. “Junk science”: the criminal cases. J Crim Law Criminol. 1993;84:105–128. 10.2307/1143887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson WC. Evaluating the admissibility of the new genetic identification tests: lessons from the ‘DNA war’. J Crim Law Criminol. 1993;84:175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morling TR. Royal commission of inquiry into chamberlain convictions. Report of the NT Government Printer, Darwin, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Freckelton I. Of blood, babies and bathwater - problems posed by DNA evidence. Alt Law J. 1992;17:10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon CR. Royal commission concerning the conviction of Edward Charles Splatt. Report of the SA Government Printer, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Proceedings of the National Forensic Science Summit, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre A. Editorial. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2017;49(2):123–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent F. Independent review of the national institute of forensic science. 2014 [cited 29 Jun 2017]. Available from: www.anzpaa.org.au.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson-Wilde L. The future of the National Institute of Forensic Science – implications for Australia and New Zealand. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2017;49(1):1–8. 10.1080/00450618.2016.1253773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Wilde L. Foundations of forensic science: Current state and future priorities. Presentation to the 2016 Australasian Forensic Science Summit, December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ross A. A brief history of SMANZFL on the 21st anniversary of its formation. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2008;40(1):31–35. 10.1080/00450610802047564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbour R. Organised crime and national security towards 2030. Presentation to the 2016 Australasian Forensic Science Summit, December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman B, Harris-Hogan S, Lentini P, Zammit A. Operation Pendennis: a case study of an Australian terrorist plot. Perspectives on Terrorism 2014; 8(4) [cited 29 Jun 2017]. Available from: https://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/364/717.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmid S. Future of crime and justice and impact on forensics. Presentation to the 2016 Australasian Forensic Science Summit, December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lovrich NP, Gaffney MJ, Pratt TC, Johnson CL, Asplen CH, Hurst LH, Schellberg TM. National forensic DNA study report. Report of the Division of Governmental Studies and Services, Washington State University and Smith Alling Lane, Professional Services, 2003 [cited 13 Sep 2004]. Available from: https://www.dnaresource.com.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh SJ, Buckleton JS, Ribaux O. Forensic DNA databases. In: Andrade FG, editor. Forensic genetics research progress. Nova Science Publishers: New York; 2009; p. 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ribaux O, Girod A, Walsh SJ, Margot P, Mizrahi S, Clivaz V. Forensic intelligence and crime analysis. Law Prob Risk. 2003;2(1):47–60. 10.1093/lpr/2.1.47
   Google Scholar
• Ribaux O, Walsh SJ, Margot P. The integration of forensic case data into criminal investigation and crime analysis: forensic Intelligence. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;156(2-3):171–181. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.12.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsht SJ, Moss DS, Kliem C, Vintiner GM. The collation of forensic DNA case data into a multi-dimensional intelligence database. Sci Justice. 2002;42(4):205–214. 10.1016/S1355-0306(02)71830-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaux O, Crispino F, Roux C. Forensic intelligence: deregulation or return to the roots of forensic science? Aust J Forensic Sci. 2015;47(1):61–71. 10.1080/00450618.2014.906656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colvin A. Lowy Lecture Series: Andrew Colvin. Sydney; March 2015 [cited 29 Jun 2017]. Available from: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/news-and-media/multimedia/audio/lowy-lecture-series-andrew-colvin
   Google Scholar
• Watson A. Further reflections on professionalism: is multi-skilling eroding police capacity? Police Assoc News, 2007; March: 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Colvin A. Building capabilities for tomorrow. Speech to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, 25 February 2016 [cited 24 Mar 2017]. Available from: https://www.afp.gov.au/news-media/national-speeches/australian-strategic-policy-institute-building-capabilities-for-tomorrow.
   Google Scholar
• Victoria Police. Victoria police capability plan 2016-2025. [cited 24 Mar 2017]. Available from: https://www.police.vic.gov.au/content.asp?a=internetBridgingPage&Media_ID=120708.
   Google Scholar
• Nisula A, Kianto A. Assessing and developing organisational renewal capability in the public sector. Int J Knowledge-Based Dev. 2014;5(1):98–115.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor N. Policing in communities towards 2030. Presentation to the 2016 Australasian Forensic Science Summit, December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington V, Colvin A. Police leadership for complex times. Policing. 2016;10(1):7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Adams DE, Mabry JP, McCoy MR, Lord WD. Challenges for forensic science: new demands in today’s world. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2013;45(4):347–355. 10.1080/00450618.2012.728246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidetti R. Collaborative intelligence production. In: Ratcliffe JH, editor. Strategic thinking in criminal intelligence. 2nd ed. Sydney: Federation Press; 2009; p. 222–234.
   Google Scholar
• Hajkowicz S. Global megatrends - seven patterns of change shaping our future. Canberra: CSIRO Publishing; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield-Dodds S. Science and technology towards 2030 – Insights from CSIRO global megatrends and Australian national outlook. Presentation to the 2016 Australasian Forensic Science Summit, December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• CSIRO. Australian National Outlook, 2015. Living standards, resource use, environmental performance and economic activity. Canberra: CSIRO; 1970–2050.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Entrustable professional activities. [cited 29 Jun 2017]. Available from: https://www.racp.edu.au/trainees/curricula/curricula-renewal/AIMBasicTrainingCurriculum/entrustable-professional-activities.
   Google Scholar