Person-portable equipment in environmental forensic investigations: application to fire scenes

References

• Galuszka A, Migaszewski Z, Namiesnik J. Moving your laboratories to the field - advantages and limitations of the use of field portable instruments in environmental sample analysis. Environ Res. 2015;140:593–603.10.1016/j.envres.2015.05.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan CC, Justes DR, Noll RJ, Sanders NL, Laughlin BC, Cooks RG. Direct monitoring of toxic compounds in air using portable mass spectrometer. The Analyst. 2006;131:556–567.10.1039/b517541 k
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Fire Toxicology. Chapter 4. Hazards associated with fires. In: Fire and smoke: understanding the hazards. Washington, USA: National Academies Press; 1986. p. 62–77.
   Google Scholar
• Fowles J, Person M, Noiton D. The ecotoxicity of fire-water runoff, Part I: review of the literature. In: New Zealand Fire Service Commission Research Report Number 17; Wellington, NZ; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Turl D, Wood D. A step out of the lab and into the field: a giant leap from technology to capability. The Analyst. 2008;133:558–562.10.1039/b713786a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song R, Schlecht PC, Ashley K. Field screening test methods: performance criteria and performance characteristics. J Hazard Mater. 2001;83:29–39.10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00325-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay R. Portable FTIR spectrometers get moving. Anal Chem. 2004;76(19):369–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckenrode BA, Bartick EG, Harvey SD, Vucelick ME, Wright BW, Huff RA. Portable Raman spectroscopy systems for field analysis. Forensic Sci Commun 2001;3(4). Available from: https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communications/fsc/oct2001/eknrode.htm
   Google Scholar
• Smith PA, Sng MT, Eckenrode BA, Leow SY, Kock D, Erickson RP, Lepage CRJ, Hook GL. Towards smaller and faster gas chromatography-mass spectrometry systems for field chemical detection. J Chromatogr A. 2005;1067:285–294.10.1016/j.chroma.2004.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contreras JA, Murray JA, Tolley SE, Oliphant JL, Tolley HD, Lammert SA, Lee ED, Later DW, Lee ML. Hand-portable gas chromatograph-toroidal ion trap mass spectrometer (GC-TMS) for detection of hazardous compounds. Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2008;19:1425–1434.10.1016/j.jasms.2008.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melquiades FL, Appoloni CR. Application of XRF and field portable XRF for environmental analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2004;262(2):533–541.10.1023/B:JRNC.0000046792.52385.b2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyraki A, Ramsey MH, Potts PJ. Evaluation of portable x-ray fluorescence instrumentation for in situ measurements of lead on contaminated land. The Analyst. 1997;122:743–749.10.1039/a700746i
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spikmans V. Complexity of scientific evidence in environmental forensic investigations. J Crim Res, Policy Pract. 2015;1(4):223–232.10.1108/JCRPP-07-2015-0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckenrode BA. Environmental and forensic applications of field-portable GC-MS: An overview. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2001;12:683–693.10.1016/S1044-0305(01)00251-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaljurand M. Analytical separations in harsh environments. Trends Environ Anal Chem. 2014;1:e2–e7.10.1016/j.teac.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkin Elmer Inc. Product note: Torion® T-9 Portable GC/MS. Waltham, MA: Perkin Elmer Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Smith PA, Lepage CRJ, Savage PB, Bowerbank CR, Lee ED, Lukacs MJ. Use of a hand-portable gas chromatograph-toroidal ion trap mass spectrometer for self-chemical ionization identification of degradation products related to O-ethy S-(2-diisopropylaminoethyl) methyl phosphonothiolate (VX). Anal Chim Acta. 2011;690:215–220.10.1016/j.aca.2011.02.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PA, Roe MTA, Sadowski C, Lee ED. Unknown exposures: gaps in basic characterization address with person-portable gas chromatography-mass spectrometry instrumentation. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011;8:129–138.10.1080/15459624.2011.550865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visotin A, Lennard C. Preliminary evaluation of a next-generation portable gas chromatograph mass spectrometer (GC-MS) for the on-site analysis of ignitable liquid residues. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2016;48(2):203–221.10.1080/00450618.2015.1045554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkin Elmer Inc. SPS-3TM (sample prep station) for use with the Torion® T-9 GC/MS instrument. Shelton, CT: Perkin Elmer Inc; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Perkin Elmer Inc. Clairion^TM hand-held battery-powered air pump for air sampling. Waltham, MA: Perkin Elmer Inc; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Almirall JR, Furton KG. Characterization of background and pyrolysis products that may interfere with the forensic analysis of fire debris. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2004;71:51–67.10.1016/S0165-2370(03)00098-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaan JD. Pyrolysis products of structure fires. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1988;28:199–309.
   Google Scholar
• Austin CC, Wang D, Ecobichon DJ, Dussault G. Characterization of volatile organic compounds in smoke at municipal structural fires. J Toxicol Environ Health, Part A. 2001;63:437–458.10.1080/152873901300343470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemieux PM, Ryan JV. Characterization of air pollutants emitted from a simulated scrap tire fire. J Air Waste Manage. 1993;43:1106–1115.10.1080/1073161X.1993.10467189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United State Environmental Protection Authority. Compendium method TO-14A determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ambient air using specially prepared canisters with subsequent analysis by gas chromatography. Cincinnati, OH: Center for Environmental Research Information, Office of Research and Development, USEPA; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• United State Environmental Protection Authority. Compendium method TO-15 determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air collected in specially-prepared canisters and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Cincinnati, OH: Center for Environmental Research Information, Office of Research and Development, USEPA; 1999.
   Google Scholar