1,264
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Three stages in the development of DNA evidence in Australia

Pages 705-714 | Received 30 Nov 2017, Accepted 07 Mar 2018, Published online: 24 Sep 2018

References

  • Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions. Annual report 1988–89. Canberra: Australian Government. 1989: 84
  • Jobling M, Gill P. Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nat Revs. 2004;5:739.
  • Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions. Annual report 1988–89. Canberra: Australian Government. 1989: 84
  • R v Tran (1990) 50 A Crim R 233, 243.
  • R v Lucas (1992) 55 A Crim R 361, 370.
  • R v Jarrett (1994) 62 SASR 443.
  • R v Milat (1996) 87 A Crim R 446, 451.
  • Model Criminal Code Officers Committee (MCCOC). Final draft: model forensic procedures bill and the proposed national DNA database. Canberra. Canberra: Australian Government; 2000.
  • Gans J. Quiet devolution: how the model criminal code officer’s committee botched New South Wales’s DNA law. Curr Iss Crim Just. 2002;14:210.
  • Australian Law Reform Commission. Essentially yours: the protection of human genetic information in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government; 2003.
  • CrimTrac. Annual report 2014–15. Canberra: Australian Government; 2015.
  • Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 ( UK).
  • Environmental Science and Research. About the DNA Databank [Internet][accessed 2018 Jan 30]. Available from: https://www.esr.cri.nz/home/about-esr/our-science-in-action/about-the-dna-databank/
  • DNA identification Act of 1994 42 U.S.C. §14132.
  • Smith M. DNA evidence in the Australian legal system. Chatswood: Lexis Nexis; 2015.
  • R v Sing (2002) 54 NSWLR 31, 37.
  • Murdoch v The Queen [2007] NTCCA 1, [333]-[339].
  • Vincent F. Inquiry into the circumstances that led to the conviction of Mr. Farah Abdulkadir Jama. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer; 2010.
  • Forbes v The Queen [2010] HCA Trans 120 (18 May 2010), 2755.
  • Fitzgerald v The Queen [2014] HCA 28 (13 August 2014), 36.
  • Smith M, Mann M. Recent developments in DNA evidence. Trends in Crime Crim Just. Canberra: Australian Government 2015;Vol. 506:1
  • Greely H, Riordan D, Garrison N, Mountain J. Family ties: the use of DNA databases to catch offenders’ kin. J Law Med Eth. 2006;34:248.
  • Smith M. DNA evidence in the Australian legal system. Chatswood: Lexis Nexis; 2015.
  • Gorrey M Police rule out family DNA link to Irma Palasics cold case murder. Canberra Times. 14 July 2015.
  • Hough A Man accused of rapes and sexual assaults in North Adelaide will seek to have half his charges dismissed. The Advertiser. 21 May 2016
  • Smith M, Urbas G. Regulating new forms of forensic DNA profiling under Australian legislation: familial matching and DNA phenotyping. Aust J For Sci. 2012;44:63.
  • Australian Crime Commission Amendment (National Policing Information) Act 2016, (Cth)
  • Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission. Biometric matching [Internet][accessed 2018 Jan 30]. Available from: https://www.acic.gov.au/our-services/biometric-matching
  • Minister for Justice. Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission to combat criminal and national security threats; 7 May 2016 [accessed 2018 Jan 30] Available from: https://www.ministerjustice.gov.au/Mediareleases/Pages/2016/SecondQuarter/Australian-Criminal-Intelligence-Commission-to-combat-criminal-and-national-security-threats.aspx
  • Mann M, Smith M. Automated facial recognition technology: recent developments and approaches to oversight. UNSWLJ. 2017;40:121.
  • Kayser M. Forensic DNA phenotyping: predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. For Sci Int: Gen. 2015;18:33.
  • MacLean C, Forensic LA. DNA phenotyping in criminal investigations and criminal courts: assessing and mitigating the dilemmas inherent in the science. Rec Adv DNA Gen Seq. 2014;8:104.
  • Box D. Queensland cops use DNA analysis to ‘see’ suspect’s face, The Australian, Vol. 27 September, 2016
  • Lester K DNA testing by University of Canberra forensics lab to make molecular sketches of crime suspects. Australian Broadcasting Corporation [accessed 2018 Jan 30] Available from: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-13/ancestry-dna-testing-to-make-molecular-sketch-of-crime-suspects/7589620
  • Parabon. Snaphot: DNA Phenotyping, Ancestry and Kinship Analysis. [accessed 2018 Jan 30] Available from: https://snapshot.parabon-nanolabs.com
  • Smith M, Urbas G. Regulating new forms of forensic DNA profiling under Australian legislation: familial matching and DNA phenotyping. Aust J For Sci. 2012;44:63.
  • Loewy A. A Proposal for the Universal Collection of DNA’ (2015) 48 Texas Tech Law Review 261; Meghan Ryan, ‘The Privacy, Probability, and Political Pitfalls of Universal DNA Collection. 20 SMU Sci Technol Law Rev. 2017;3
  • S and Marper v United Kingdom [2008] ECHR 1581.
  • Kaye D, Smith M. DNA identification databases: legality, legitimacy, and the case for population wide coverage. Wisc Law Rev. 2003;3:413.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.