The chequered past and risky future of digital forensics

References

• Casey E. Digital evidence and computer crime: forensic science, computers, and the internet. 3rd ed. San Diego, USA: Academic Press; 2011 May.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt M The Hermeneutics Of The Hard Drive: Using Narratology, Natural Language Processing, And Knowledge Management To Improve The Effectiveness Of The Digital Forensic Process [ PhD Dissertation]. University of Central Florida; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ribaux O, Casey E, Delémont O, Crispino F. The numerical metamorphosis of the traditional forensic science laboratory. EAFS 2018 plenary session. Lyon (France): European Academy of Forensic Science; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ribaux O, Roux C, Crispino F. Expressing the value of forensic science in policing. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2017;49(5):489–501. doi:10.1080/00450618.2016.1229816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACPO. ACPO good practice guide for digital evidence. Association of Chief Police Officers; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt M. Personal communication. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Geradts Z. ENFSI Forensic IT Working group. Special issue on standards, professionalization and quality in digital forensics. Digital Invest. 2011;8(2):89–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt M, Casey E, Jaquet-Chiffelle D-O, Gladyshev P A framework for harmonizing forensic science practices and digital/multimedia evidence. OSAC Technical Series 0002. 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.29325/OSAC.TS.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd C, Forster P. Time and date issues in forensic computing—a case study. Digital Investigation. 2004 Feb;1(1):18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Cusack B, Homewood A. Identifying bugs in digital forensic tools. In: Proceedings of the 11th Australian Digital Forensics Conference. Joondalup, Australia: Edith Cowan University; 2013. doi:10.4225/75/57b3c3befb86c.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson C Digital Evidence Discrepancies – Casey Anthony Trial. Digital Detective. 2011. [Accessed 2018 Oct 26]. https://www.digital-detective.net/digital-evidence-discrepancies-casey-anthony-trial/.
   Google Scholar
• Casey E, Ferraro M, Nguyen L. Investigation delayed is justice denied: proposals for expediting forensic examinations of digital evidence. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54(6):1353–1364. doi:10.1111/jfo.2009.54.issue-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunde N Non-technical Sources of Errors When Handling Digital Evidence within a Criminal Investigation [ Master’s thesis]. Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Casey E Reinforcing the scientific method in digital investigations using a case-based reasoning (CBR) system [ PhD dissertation]. [Belfield (Dublin)]: University College Dublin; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Casey E. 2002. Error, uncertainty and loss in digital evidence. Int J Digital Evidence. 1(2).
   Google Scholar
• Collie J. Digital forensic evidence—flaws in the criminal justice system. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;289:154–155. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay v R, Court of Appeal - Civil Division. 2017 Dec 21. EWCA Crim 2214.
   Google Scholar
• Metropolitan Police & Crown Prosecution Service. A joint review of the disclosure process in the case of R v Allan. 2018. [accessed 2018 Nov 4]. https://www.cps.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/publications/joint-review-disclosure-Allan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Casey E. Differentiating the phases of digital investigations. Digital Invest. 2016 Dec;19:A1–A3. doi:10.1016/j.diin.2016.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin R Judge blocks Google evidence from Troy murder trial. Albany Times Union, Oct 27, 2017. [Accessed 2018 Oct26]. https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/Google-evidence-tossed-from-Troy-suitcase-murder-12311986.php.
   Google Scholar
• Casey E, Ribaux O, Roux C. The Kodak syndrome: risks and opportunities created by decentralization of forensic capabilities. J Forensic Sci. 2019;64(1):127–136. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey E, Ribaux O, Roux C. Digital transformations and the viability of forensic science laboratories: crisis-opportunity through decentralisation. Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Aug;289:e24–e25. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servida F, Casey E. IoT Forensic Challenges and Opportunities for Digital Traces. In: Proceedings of DFRWS EU 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Inspector General. A special inquiry regarding the accuracy of FBI statements concerning its capabilities to exploit an iPhone seized during the San Bernardino terror attack investigation. US Department of Justice; 2018. https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2018/o1803.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Casey E Brief of Amicus Curiae in Supreme Judicial Court for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts [SJC-10593], Commonwealth v Keown. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Massachusetts v James Keown [SJC-10593], Supreme Judicial Court for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. [Accessed 2018 Nov 4]. http://www.ma-appellatecourts.org/display_docket.php?dno=SJC-10593.
   Google Scholar
• SWGDE. SWGDE Establishing Confidence in Digital and Multimedia Evidence Forensic Results by Error Mitigation Analysis. Version: 2.0 (July 9, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• SWGDE. Recommended Guidelines for Validation Testing. Version: 2.0 (Sep 5, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• UK Forensic Science Regulator. Method validation in digital forensics. FSR-G-218. Issue 1. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Casey E, Jaquet-Chiffelle D-O. Do identities matter? Policing: J Policy Prac. 2017;pax034. doi:10.1093/police/pax034.
   Google Scholar
• Casey E, Nikkel B, Geradts Z. Transdisciplinary strategies for digital investigation challenges. Digital Invest. 2018 Jun;25:1–4. doi:10.1016/j.diin.2018.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beek HMA, van Eijk EJ, van Baar RB, Ugen M, Bodde JNC, Siemelink AJ. Digital forensics as a service: game on. Digital investigation, special issue big data intelligent data analysis. 2015;15:20–38
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman MS, Dachtera J, Pipek V, Wulf V. Sharing knowledge and expertise: the CSCW view of knowledge management. Cscw. 2013;22(4):531–573. doi:10.1007/s10606-013-9192-8.
   Google Scholar
• Zehnder A, Casey E. Inter-regional digital forensic knowledge and information exchange platform. Proc 71st Ann Sci Meeting Am Acad Forensic Sci. 2019 Feb;13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer S, Heudt L, Barret A, George L, Dijk KV, Gason F. The introduction of forensic advisors in Belgium and their role in the criminal justice system. Sci Justice. 2018;58(3):177–184. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2017.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crispino F, Rossy Q, Ribaux O, Claude R. Education and training in forensic intelligence: a new challenge. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2015;47(1):49–60. doi:10.1080/00450618.2014.906655).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margot P. Commentary on the need for a research culture in the forensic sciences. UCLA Law Rev. 2011;58:795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaux O, Margot P. Case-based reasoning in criminal intelligence using forensic case data. Sci Justice. 2003;43(3):135–143. doi:10.1016/S1355-0306(03)71760-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaux O, Wright BT. Expanding forensic science through forensic intelligence. Sci Just. 2014;54(6):494–501. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2014.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caltagirone S, Pendergast A, Betz C. The diamond model of intrusion analysis. Centre Threat Intel Threat Res. Defense Technical Information Center. 2013. Technical Report ADA586960. Hanover, Maryland USA. https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA586960
   Google Scholar
• Casey E, Barnum S, Griffith R, Snyder J, Beek H, Nelson A. Advancing coordinated cyber-investigations and tool interoperability using a community developed specification language. J Digital Invest. 2017;22:14–45. doi:10.1016/j.diin.2017.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey E, Biasiotti MA, Turchi F Using standardization and ontology to enhance data protection and intelligent analysis of electronic evidence. Discovery of Electronically Stored Information Workshop (DESI VII). ICAIL; 2017. https://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~oard/desi7/.
   Google Scholar