References
- Benschop CCG, van der Beek CP, Meiland HC, et al. Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results. FSI:Genet. 2011;5:316–328.
- Gill P, Buckleton JB. A universal strategy to interpret DNA profiles that does not require a definition of low copy number. FSI: Genet. 4;2010:221–227.
- Kloosterman AD, Kersbergen P. Efficacy and limits of genotyping low copy number (LCN) DNA samples by multiplex PCR of STR loci. J Soc Biol. 2003;197(4):351–359.
- Gill P, Haned H. A new methodological framework to interpret complex DNA profiles using likelihood ratios. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2013 Feb 1;7(2):251–263. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.11.002
- Gray SB, Sumner RV, Fitzgerald RV AustLII. [Internet]. 2018 [accessed 2018 Dec 20]. http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/sa/SASCFC/2013/82.html.
- Kourakis PS, Pfennig RV AustLII. [Internet]. 2018 [accessed 2018 Dec 20]. http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/sa/SASCFC/2018/27.html.
- Budowle B, Eisenberg AJ, van Daal A. Low copy number typing has yet to achieve “general acceptance”. Forensic Sci Int: Genet Suppl Ser. 2009;2(1):551–552.
- Caragine T, Prinz M. Comment on “Low copy number typing has yet to achieve “general acceptance”. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2011;5(1):3–4. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.03.015.
- Budowle B, Eisenberg AJ, van Daal A. Response to Comment on “Low copy number typing has yet to achieve “general acceptance”. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2011;5(1):5–7. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.03.016.
- Buckleton J, Gill P. Further comment on “Low copy number typing has yet to achieve “general acceptance”. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2011;5(1):7–11. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.03.011.
- Gill P, Whitaker J, Flaxman C, Brown N, Buckleton J. An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Jul 24;112(1):17–40.
- Coble MD, Bright JA. Probabilistic genotyping software: an overview. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2019;38:219-224 .
- Bright JA, Taylor D, Gittelson S, Buckleton J. The paradigm shift in DNA profile interpretation. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2017 Nov 1;31:e24–32. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.08.005.
- Gill P, Hicks T, Butler JM, Connolly E, Gusmão L, Kokshoorn B, Morling N, van Oorschot RA, Parson W, Prinz M, et al. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: assessing the value of forensic biological evidence-Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2018 Sep 1;36:189–202. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.003.
- Taylor D, Kokshoorn B, Biedermann A. Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2018 Jun 7;36:34–49. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.06.001.
- van Oorschot RA, Szkuta B, Meakin GE, Kokshoorn B, Goray M. DNA transfer in forensic science: a review. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2019;38:140-166.