532
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A cold case turns hot after 30 years

, , , &
Pages S60-S67 | Received 20 Dec 2018, Accepted 08 Jan 2019, Published online: 02 Feb 2019

References

  • Benschop CCG, van der Beek CP, Meiland HC, et al. Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results. FSI:Genet. 2011;5:316–328.
  • Gill P, Buckleton JB. A universal strategy to interpret DNA profiles that does not require a definition of low copy number. FSI: Genet. 4;2010:221–227.
  • Kloosterman AD, Kersbergen P. Efficacy and limits of genotyping low copy number (LCN) DNA samples by multiplex PCR of STR loci. J Soc Biol. 2003;197(4):351–359.
  • Gill P, Haned H. A new methodological framework to interpret complex DNA profiles using likelihood ratios. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2013 Feb 1;7(2):251–263. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.11.002
  • Gray SB, Sumner RV, Fitzgerald RV AustLII. [Internet]. 2018 [accessed 2018 Dec 20]. http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/sa/SASCFC/2013/82.html.
  • Kourakis PS, Pfennig RV AustLII. [Internet]. 2018 [accessed 2018 Dec 20]. http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/sa/SASCFC/2018/27.html.
  • Budowle B, Eisenberg AJ, van Daal A. Low copy number typing has yet to achieve “general acceptance”. Forensic Sci Int: Genet Suppl Ser. 2009;2(1):551–552.
  • Caragine T, Prinz M. Comment on “Low copy number typing has yet to achieve “general acceptance”. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2011;5(1):3–4. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.03.015.
  • Budowle B, Eisenberg AJ, van Daal A. Response to Comment on “Low copy number typing has yet to achieve “general acceptance”. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2011;5(1):5–7. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.03.016.
  • Buckleton J, Gill P. Further comment on “Low copy number typing has yet to achieve “general acceptance”. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2011;5(1):7–11. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.03.011.
  • Gill P, Whitaker J, Flaxman C, Brown N, Buckleton J. An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Jul 24;112(1):17–40.
  • Coble MD, Bright JA. Probabilistic genotyping software: an overview. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2019;38:219-224 .
  • Bright JA, Taylor D, Gittelson S, Buckleton J. The paradigm shift in DNA profile interpretation. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2017 Nov 1;31:e24–32. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.08.005.
  • Gill P, Hicks T, Butler JM, Connolly E, Gusmão L, Kokshoorn B, Morling N, van Oorschot RA, Parson W, Prinz M, et al. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: assessing the value of forensic biological evidence-Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2018 Sep 1;36:189–202. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.003.
  • Taylor D, Kokshoorn B, Biedermann A. Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2018 Jun 7;36:34–49. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.06.001.
  • van Oorschot RA, Szkuta B, Meakin GE, Kokshoorn B, Goray M. DNA transfer in forensic science: a review. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2019;38:140-166.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.