Australian biometric system to meet national security objectives – Part II legislation and policy

References

• Wilson LE, Gahan ME, Lennard C, Robertson J. A systems approach to forensic science applied in the military domain. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2017;51(3):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson LE, Gahan ME, Lennard C, Robertson J. Why do we need a systems thinking approach to military forensic science in the contemporary world? Aust J Forensic Sci. 2020;52(3): 323-336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson L, Gahan M, Lennard C, Robertson J. The black sheep of forensic science: military forensic and technical exploitation. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2018;1–13. Published online(Null).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson LE, Kessler MP, Ellis‐Smith J, Robertson J. A systems approach to integration of military operations and law enforcement investigations: toward a unified forensic intelligence model. Wiley Interdiscipl Rev. 2020;2(2): e1358.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Security Council. Resolution 2322. 2016. Adopted by the security council at its 7831th meeting: on 12 december 2016.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Security Council. Resolution 2396. 2017. Adopted by the security council at its 8146th meeting: on 21 december 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson LE, Wright K, Robertson J, Lennard C Australian biometric system to meet national security objectives – part I technical. In draft. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• The Auditor-General. The Australian criminal intelligence commission’s administration of the biometric identification services project. Canberra (Austrlia): Commonwealth of Australia. Auditor-general report no. 24 2018–19 performance audit; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Attorney-General’s Department. National facial biometric matching capability. Canberra (Australia): Commonwealth of Australia; 2015 Aug. Privacy impact assessment – interoperability hub.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. The crimes act 1914 (Cth). In the crimes act 1914 (Cth). 1914. [access 17 October 2019]. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Browse/ByTitle/Acts/InForce/0/0/Principal
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. Crimes act amendment (forensic procedures) bill (No. 1) In. Crimes act amendment (forensic procedures) bill (No. 1). 2006. [access 17 October 2019]. Available from: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s509
   Google Scholar
• Wilson L, Gahan M, Lennard C, Robertson J. Why do we need a systems thinking approach to military forensic science in the contemporary world? Aust J Forensic Sci. 2020;52(3):323–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prime Minister of Australia. A strong and secure Australia Canberra. Australia: Commonwealth of Australia; 2017 Oct 13.
   Google Scholar
• The Australian Government Department of Home Affairs. The home affairs portfolio biometrics strategy 2020–24. Canberra (Australia): Commonwealth of Australia; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations office of Counter-Terrorism, United Nations Security Council. United Nations compendium of recommended practices for the responsible use and sharing of biometrics in counter-terrorism. Geneva (Switzerland): United Nations; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Commisoner for privacy and data protection. Biometrics and privacy. Canberra (Australia): Commonwealth of Australia; 2016 Apr.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. The privacy act 1988 (Cth). In. The privacy act 1988 (Cth). 1988. [access 17 October 2019]. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Browse/ByTitle/Acts/InForce/0/0/Principal
   Google Scholar
• Wilson L, Gahan M, Lennard C, Robertson J. A systems approach to biometrics in the military domain. J Forensic Sci. 2018;63(6):1858–1863. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y. Privacy regulations on biometrics in Australia. ?Comput Law Secur Rev. 2010;26(4):355–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2010.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. Australian privacy principles guidelines. Canberra (Australia): Commonwealth of Australia; 2019 July. Privacy Act 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Australian Information Commisioner. Privacy (Australian Government agencies – governance) APP COde 2017. Canberra (Australia): Australian Government; 2017 Oct 26.
   Google Scholar
• Scudder N, McNevin D, Kelty SF, Walsh SJ, Robertson J. 2018. Forensic DNA phenotyping: developing a model privacy impact assessment. ?Forensic Sci Int Genet. 34:222–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scudder N, McNevin D, Kelty SF, Walsh SJ, Robertson J. Massively parallel sequencing and the emergence of forensic genomics: defining the policy and legal issues for law enforcement. ?Sci Justice. 2018;58(2):153–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2017.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joh EE. Reclaiming abandoned DNA: the fourth amendment and genetic privacy. Nw UL Rev. 100;2006:857.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. Australian crime commission regulations 2018. 2018. In Australian crime commission regulations 2018. [access 17 October 2019]. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2018L01780/Explanatory%20Statement/Text
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. International covenant on civil and political rights. United Nations, Treaty Series; 1966. International covenant on civil and political rights
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. Privacy amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) act 2012. 2012. Privacy amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) act 2012. [access 17 October 2019]. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2012A00197
   Google Scholar
• Identifying terrorist suspects Lyon. France: INTERPOL. 2019. [Accessed 2019 Aug 25].
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. Mutual assistance in criminal investigation act 1987 (Cth). 1987. Mutual assistance in criminal investigation act 1987 (Cth). [access 17 October 2019]. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Browse/ByTitle/Acts/InForce/0/0/Principal
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. The archives act 1983 (Cth). 1983. The Archives Act 1983 (Cth). [access 17 October 2019]. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Browse/ByTitle/Acts/InForce/0/0/Principal
   Google Scholar
• The White House. Homeland security presidential directive/HSPD- 6. Washington DC (United States): The White House; 2003 Sept.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the deputy under secretary of defense for acquisition and technology systems and software engineering. Systems engineering guide for systems of systems. Washington DC (United States): ODUSD(A&T)SSE; 2008 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office. DOD needs to establish clear goals and objectives, guidance, and a designated budget to manage its biometrics activities. Washington DC (United States): United States Government Accountability Office; 2008 Sept. GAO-08-1065.
   Google Scholar
• Biometrics Institute. Biometrics privacy guidelines. Canberra (Austrlia): Biometrics Institute; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Smith M, Mann M, Urbas G. Biometrics, crime and security. London (United Kingdom): Routledge; Law, Sci & Society; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Report to the President - forensic science in criminal courts: ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods. Washington DC (United States): Executive Office of the President; 2016 Sept.
   Google Scholar
• Langenburg G, Champod C, Genessay T. Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;219(1–3):183–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.12.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann C, Champod C, Puch‐Solis R, Egli N, Anthonioz A, Bromage‐Griffiths A. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of any number of minutiae. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(1):54–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00327.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meagher SB, Dvornychenko V Defining AFIS latent print “lights-out”. Paper presented at: NIST ELFT Workshop. 2009 Mar 19–20. Gaithersburg (Maryland): NIST.
   Google Scholar
• National institute of Forensic Science. Rapid DNA project – phase 2, detailed technical evaluation report for the DNAscan system. Melbourne (Australia): Australian New Zealand Policing Advisory Agency, National Institute of Forensic Science; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• United States Government. Rapid DNA act of 2017. Congress US editor. Rapid DNA Act of 2017. 42 USC 13701. Washington DC (United States). 2017. [access 10 July 2019]. Available from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/510/all-info
   Google Scholar
• Wilson-Wilde L, Pitman F. Legislative and policy implications for the use of rapid DNA technology in the Australian context. Forensic Sci Policy Manag. 2017;8(1–2):26–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19409044.2017.1335809.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Biometric-based technologies. OECD digital economy papers No. 101.Paris: France OECD Publishing; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• The White House. National security presidential directive/NSPD-59. Washington DC (United States): The White House; 2008 June.
   Google Scholar
• The White House. Homeland security presidential directive/HSPD- 24, biometrics for identification and screening to enhance national security. Washington DC (United States): The White House; 2008 June 5.
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office. Defense management: DOD needs to establish more guidance for biometrics collection and can explore broadening data sharing. Washington DC (United States): United States Government Accountability Office; 2008 May 21. GAO-08-430NI.
   Google Scholar
• NSTC subcommittee on biometrics and identity management. NSTC policy for enabling the development, adoption and use of biometric standards. Washington DC (United States): Executive Office of the President of the United States; 2007 Sept 7.
   Google Scholar
• National Science and Technology Counsil. Biometrics in government post −9/11. Advancing science, enhancing operations. Washington DC (United States): The Executive Office of the President of the United States August; 2008.
   Google Scholar