Dental identification practices across Australia

References

• National Research Council. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Executive Office of the President President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Forensic science in criminal courts: ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hill IR. Forensic odontology: its scope and history. The University of Michigan. Ian R. Hill; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Chiam SL, Page M, Higgins D, Taylor J. Validity of forensic odontology identification by comparison of conventional dental radiographs: a scoping review. Sci Justice. 2019;59(1):93–101. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2018.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mânica S, Gorza L. 2019. Forensic odontology in the 21st century– identifying the opinions of those behind the teaching. J Forensic Leg Med. 64:7–13. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2019.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell S, Sah S, Albright TD, Gates SJ, Denton MB, Casadevall A. A call for more science in forensic science. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2018;115(18):4541–4544. doi:10.1073/pnas.1712161115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin JM, Ribeiro G, Rairden A. Open forensic science. J Law Biosci. 2019;6(1):255–288. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsz009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evett IW, Berger C, Buckleton J, Champod C, Jackson G. 2017. Finding the way forward for forensic science in the US– a commentary on the PCAST report. Forensic Sci Int. 278:16–23. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison GS, Kaye DH, Balding DJ, Taylor D, Dawid P, Aitken CG, Gittelson S, Zadora G, Robertson B, Willis S. 2017. A comment on the PCAST report: skip the “match”/“non-match” stage. Forensic Sci Int. 272:e7–e9. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Dental Association. Policy statement 5.17– dental records (Including ADA guidelines for dental records). 2012 [accessed 2020 Oct 16]. Available from: https://www.ada.org.au/Dental-Professionals/Policies/Third-Parties/5-17-Dental-Records/ADAPolicies_5-17_DentalRecords_V1
   Google Scholar
• Dental Board of Australia. Code of conduct. 2014 [accessed 2020 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.dentalboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines/Policies-Codes-Guidelines/Code-of-conduct.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Stow L, James H, Richards L. Australian oral health case notes: assessment of forensic relevance and adherence to recording guidelines. Aust Dent J. 2016;61(2):236–243. doi:10.1111/adj.12350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Forensic Odonto-stomatology. I.O.F.O.S. Recommendations for quality assurance: body identification. Single case. 2018 [accessed 2020 Oct 10]. Available from: http://www.iofos.eu/Quality-Ass/QA_2018_final/Identification_single_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aschheim K, Adams BJ. Odontosearch 3.2. 2018 [accessed 2020 Apr 5]. Available from: http://www.odontosearch.com/en/3.2/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Adams BJ. Establishing personal identification based on specific patterns of missing, filled, and unrestored teeth. J Forensic Sci. 2003;48(3):487–496. doi:10.1520/JFS2002226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams BJ. The diversity of adult dental patterns in the United States and the implications for personal identification. J Forensic Sci. 2003;48(3):497–503. doi:10.1520/JFS2002225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gremaud J-L. A likelihood ratio approach to identification in forensic odontology. Probl Forensic Sci. 2008;76:339–353.
   Google Scholar
• Steadman DW, Adams BJ, Konigsberg LW. Statistical basis for positive identification in forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006;131(1):15–26. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Oral examination component. Westat, Inc; 1992 [accessed 2020 Oct 16]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes3/cdrom/nchs/manuals/dental.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Page M, Taylor J, Blenkin M. Context effects and observer bias– implications for forensic odontology. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57(1):108–112. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01903.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zondag H, Phillips V. The discrimination potential of radio-opaque composite restorations for identification: part 3. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2009;27(1):27–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trochesset DA, Serchuk RB, Colosi DC. Generation of intra-oral-like images from cone beam computed tomography volumes for dental forensic image comparison. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59(2):510–513. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest AS. Collection and recording of radiological information for forensic purposes. Aust Dent J. 2012;57(Suppl 1):24–32. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01658.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruder TD, Thali YA, Rashid SN, Mund MT, Thali MJ, Hatch GM, Christensen AM, Somaini S, Ampanozi G. 2016. Validation of post mortem dental CT for disaster victim identification. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 5:25–30. doi:10.1016/j.jofri.2016.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest A. Forensic odontology in DVI: current practice and recent advances. Forensic Sci Res. 2019;4(4):316–330. doi:10.1080/20961790.2019.1678710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adisa A, Kolude B, Ogunrinde T. Palatal rugae as a tool for human identification. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014;17(5):641–643. doi:10.4103/1119-3077.141434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelis D, Riboli F, Gibelli D, Cappella A, Cattaneo C. Palatal rugae as an individualising marker: reliability for forensic odontology and personal identification. Sci Justice. 2012;52(3):181–184. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2011.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibelli D, De Angelis D, Pucciarelli V, Riboli F, Ferrario VF, Dolci C, Sforza C, Cattaneo C. Application of 3D models of palatal rugae to personal identification: hints at identification from 3D-3D superimposition techniques. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132(4):1241–1245. doi:10.1007/s00414-017-1744-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemanth M, Vidya M, Shetty N, Karkera BV. Identification of individuals using palatal rugae: computerized method. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2010;2(2):86–90. doi:10.4103/0975-1475.81288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borrman H, Dahlbom U, Loyola E, Rene N. Quality evaluation of 10 years patient records in forensic odontology. Int J Legal Med. 1995;108(2):100–104. doi:10.1007/BF01369914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleyer T, Spallek H, Hernández P. A qualitative investigation of the content of dental paper-based and computer-based patient record formats. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2007;14(4):515–526. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar