REFERENCES
- Benacerraf, Paul. 1965. “What Numbers Could Not Be.” The Philosophical Review74 (1): 47–73.
- Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making it Explicit. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Candlish, Stewart. 1996. “The Unity of the Proposition and Russell's Theories of Judgement.” In Bertrand Russell and the Origins of Analytic Philosophy, edited by RayMonk, and AnthonyPalmer, 103–135. Bristol: Thoemmes.
- Collins, John. 2011. The Unity of Linguistic Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hanks, Peter. 2011. “Structured Propositions as Types.” Mind120 (1): 11–52. 10.1093/mind/fzr011.
- Jubien, Michael. 2001. “Propositions and the Objects of Thought.” Philosophical Studies104 (1): 47–62. 10.1007/0-306-48134-0_10.
- Kaplan, David. 1968. “Quantifying In.” Synthese19 (1/2): 178–214.
- King, Jeffrey. 2007. The Nature and Structure of Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Monk, Ray, and AnthonyPalmer, eds. 1996. Bertrand Russell and the Origins of Analytic Philosophy. Bristol: Thoemmes.
- Russell, Bertrand. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Schapiro, Stuart. 2009. Classical Logic. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N.Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-classical/. (Winter 2012 Edition).
- Sainsbury, Mark. 1996. “How Can We Say Something?” In Bertrand Russell and the Origins of Analytic Philosophy, edited by RayMonk, and AnthonyPalmer, 137–153. Bristol: Thoemmes, Reprinted as How Can Some Thing Say Some Thing? Chapter 5 in Sainsbury, Departing from Frege. London: Routledge, 2002.
- Soames, Scott. 2010. What is Meaning?Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Williamson, Timothy. 1985. “Converse Relations.” The Philosophical Review94 (2): 249–262.