REFERENCES
- Copenhaver, Rebecca. 2006. “Is Reid a Mysterian?” Journal of the History of Philosophy44 (3): 449–466.
- Copenhaver, Rebecca. 2007. “Reid on Consciousness: HOP, HOT, or FOR?” The Philosophical Quarterly57 (229): 613–634.
- Destutt de Tracy, Antoine-Louis-Claude. 1801. Projet d'éléments d'idéologie. Paris: P. Didot l'aîné, F. Didot et Debray.
- Destutt de Tracy, Antoine L. C.2012. Eléments d'idéologie. Idéologie proprement dite, edited by ClaudeJolly. Paris: Vrin.
- Hoffman, Paul. D.2006. “Thomas Reid's Notion of Exertion.” Journal of the History of Philosophy44 (3): 431–447.
- Huoranszki, Ferenc. 2003. “Common Sense and the Theory of Human Behaviour.” In The Philosophy of Thomas Reid, edited by JohnHaldane, and Stephen L.Read, 113–130. London: Blackwell Publishing.
- Lindsay, Chris. 2005. “Reid on Scepticism about Agency and the Self.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy3 (1): 19–33.
- Reid, Thomas. 2002. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man [EIP], edited by Derek R.Brookes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Reid, Thomas. 2003. “Of Power.” In The Philosophy of Thomas Reid, edited by JohnHaldane, and Stephen L.Read, 14–23. London: Blackwell Publishing.
- Reid, Thomas. 2010. Essays on the Active Powers of Man [EAP], edited by KnudHaakonssen and James A.Harris. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 2001. Thomas Reid and the Story of Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Yaffe, Gideon. 2004. Manifest Activity. Thomas Reid's Theory of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.