REFERENCES
- Alston, William. 1985. “Thomas Reid on Epistemic Principles.” History of Philosophy Quarterly2: 435–452.
- De Bary, Thomas. 2000. “Thomas Reid's Metaprinciple.” American Catholic Philosophical QuarterlyLXXIV (3): 373–383.
- De Bary, Thomas. 2002. Thomas Reid and Scepticism: His Reliabilist Response. New York: Routledge.
- Donnellan, Keith S.1966. “Reference and Definite Descriptions.” The Philosophical Review75 (3): 281–304.
- Greco, John. 2002. “How to Reid Moore.” The Philosophical Quarterly52 (209): 544–563. Reprinted in Haldane and Read eds., 131–150.
- Greco, John. 2010. Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Haldane, John, and StephenRead, eds. 2003. The Philosophy of Thomas Reid: A Collection of Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Lehrer, Keith. 1989. Thomas Reid. London: Routledge.
- Lehrer, Keith. 1990. “Chisholm, Reid, and the Problem of the Epistemic Surd.” Philosophical Studies60 (1–2): 39–45.
- Lehrer, Keith. 1998. “Reid, Hume and Common Sense.” Reid Studies2 (1): 15–25.
- Lehrer, Keith, and BradleyWarner. 2000. “Reid, God and Epistemology.” American Catholic Philosophical QuarterlyLXXIV (3): 357–372.
- Lemos, Noah. 2004. Common Sense: A Contemporary Defense. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Reid, Thomas. 1885. Philosophical Works, edited by WilliamHamilton. 8th editionGeorg Olms Verlag.
- Reid, Thomas. (1764) 1997. An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense, edited by Derek R.Brookes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Reid, Thomas. (1785) 1997. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, edited by Derek R.Brookes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Rysiew, Patrick. 2002. “Reid and Epistemic Naturalism.” The Philosophical Quarterly52 (209): 437–456. Reprinted in Haldane and Read, eds., 24–43.
- Rysiew, Patrick. 2005. “Reidian Evidence.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy3 (2): 107–121.
- Rysiew, Patrick. 2011. “Making it Evident: Evidence and Evidentness, Justification and Belief.” In Evidentialism and its Discontents, edited by TrentDougherty, 207–225. Oxford University Press.
- Sosa, Ernest, and JamesVan Cleve. 2001. “Thomas Reid.” In The Blackwell Guide to the Modern Philosophers: From Descartes to Nietzsche, edited by S.Emmanuel, 179–200. Malden, Ma & Oxford: Blackwell.
- Van Cleve, James. 1999. “Reid on the First Principles of Contingent Truths.” Reid Studies3 (1): 3–30.
- Van Cleve, James. 2008. “Reid's Response to the Skeptic.” In The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism, edited by JohnGreco, 286–309. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
- Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 2001. Thomas Reid and the Story of Epistemology. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112447/MPU-L1HU.png"})