Developing Children's Early Competencies to Engage With Science

REFERENCES

• Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, W., Lankes, E. M., Prenzel, M., Schwippert, K., Walther, G., Valtin, R., & Voss, A. (2003). To which questions does a combined interpretation of the results yielded by both PISA and IGLU provide well grounded answers? Zeitschrift Fur Padagogik, 49, 198–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem, S. K., & Rips, L. J. (2000). Explanation and evidence in informal argument. Cognitive Science, 24, 573–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricker, L., & Bell, P. (2012). Argumentation and reasoning in life and in school: Implications for the design of school science learning environments. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 117–133). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Richter, T., & Rouet, J.-F. (this issue). Scientific literacy: The role of goal-directed reading and evaluation in understanding scientific information. Educational Psychologist, 49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Porsch, T. (2010). Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) to be attained from others. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 163–193). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, M., Sodian, B., & Koerber, S. (2009). Doing experiments and understanding science: Development of scientific reasoning from childhood to adulthood. In W. Schneider & M. Bullock (Eds.), Human development from early childhood to early adulthood: Findings from a 20 year longitudinal study (pp. 173–197). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, M., & Ziegler, A. (1999). Scientific reasoning: Developmental and individual differences. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Individual development from 3 to 12: Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70, 1098–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46, 141–167.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Children's responses to anomalous scientific data: How is conceptual change impeded? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., & Sinha, V. (2006). Randomized experiments in educational research. In J. Green, G. Camilli & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 551–566). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Corriveau, K. H., Harris, P. L., Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Arnott, B., Elliott, L., …, & De Rosnay, M. (2009). Young children's trust in their mother's claims: Longitudinal links with attachment security in infancy. Child Development, 80, 750–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K., & Klahr, D. (2012). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 701–718). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A. (2008). Science education in 3-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic and social goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95, 168–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. (2012). Making sense of autism: Progressive engagement with science among parents of young, recently diagnosed autistic children. Public Understanding of Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0963662512455296
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N., Allen, S., & Jenkins, E. W. (2013). Outside the pipeline: Reimagining science education for nonscientists. Science, 340, 314–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30, 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). Managing, understanding, applying, and creating knowledge in the information age: Next-generation challenges and opportunities. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 255–269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1085–1108. doi:10.1037/a0028044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P.L. (2012) Trusting what you’re told. How children learn from others. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 703–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. D. (2008). Scientific uncertainty in news coverage of cancer research: Effects of hedging on scientists' and journalists' credibility. Human Communication Research, 34, 347–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31, 191–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koerber, S., Osterhaus, C., & Sodian, B. (2013, April). Evidence-based reasoning in the light of contrary beliefs. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the Society of Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Koerber, S., Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., & Nett, U. (2005). Scientific reasoning in young children: Preschoolers' ability to evaluate covariation evidence. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Revue Suisse De Psychologie, 64, 141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. (2001). “To trust or not to trust…"—Pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 877–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., …, & Ulvik, M. (2006). Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90, 632–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpan, C. A., Bisanz, G. L., Bisanz, J., & Henderson, J. M. (1997). Assessing literacy in science: Evaluation of scientific news briefs. Science Education, 81, 515–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koslowski, B. (2012). Scientific reasoning: Explanation, confirmation bias and scientific practice. In G. Feist & M. Gorman (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of science and technology (pp. 151–192). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2010). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 472–534). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O’Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. Orlando, FL: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Franklin, S. (2006). The second decade. What develops (and how). In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception and language (pp. 953–993). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Schauble, L., & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 285–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushnir, T., & Gopnik, A. (2005). Young children infer causal strength from probabilities and interventions. Psychological Science, 16, 678–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazonder, A. W., Hagemans, M. G., & De Jong, T. (2010). Offering and discovering domain information in stimulation-based inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 511–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising form genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23, 285–302.
   Google Scholar
• Legare, C. H. (2012). Exploring explanation: Explaining inconsistent evidence informs exploratory, hypothesis-testing behavior in young children. Child Development, 83, 173–185. doi:10.111/j.1467-8624.2011.01691.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2004). Modeling natural variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 635–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Lucas, D. (2008). Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry. Cognitive Development, 23, 512–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, C. G., Bridgers, S., Griffiths, T. L., & Gopnik, A. (2014). When children are better (or at least more open-minded) learners than adults: Developmental differences in learning the forms of causal relationships. Cognition, 131, 284–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, M., Rothmund, T., Retzbach, A., Otto, L., & Besley, J. C. (this issue). Informal learning through science media usage. Educational Psychologist, 49.
   Google Scholar
• Masnick, A. M., & Morris, B. J. (2008) Investigating the development of data evaluation: The role of data characteristics. Child Development, 79, 1032–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., & Kelly, G. (2011). Beyond argumentation: sense-making discourse in the science classroom. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 265–281). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, K. E. (2004). Children's understanding of scientific inquiry: their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 219–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, K. E. (2011). Disentangling robust developmental constraints from the instructionally mutable: Young children's epistemic reasoning about a study of their own design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 50–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2012a). Co-opting science: A preliminary study of how students invoke science in value-laden discussions. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 275–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2012b). Science in discussions: An analysis of the use of science content in socioscientific discussions. Science Education, 96, 428–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S., Anderson, C., & David, Y. M. (1993). Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem solving. Elementary School Journal, 93, 643–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., & Grotzer, T. A. (2005). Dimensions of causal understanding: the role of complex causal models in students' understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 41, 117–166.
   Google Scholar
• Piekny, J., & Mähler, C. (2013) Scientific reasoning in early and middle childhood: The development of domain-general evidence evaluation, experimentation, and hypothesis generation skills. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31, 153–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porsch, T., Bromme, R., & Pollmeier, J. (2010). Was muss man tun, um sicher die richtige Lösung zu finden? Quellenpräferenzen von Grundschulkindern in verschiedenen Fachkontexten [What needs to be done to find the right answer? Source preferences of elementary school children dealing with tasks from different school subjects]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 42, 90–98. doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M. (1999). Evaluation of abilities in interpreting media reports of scientific research. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1085–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 61–94.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action: Charting the landscape. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, J. L. (2014). Why understanding science matters: The IES research guidelines as a case in point. Educational Researcher, 43, 15–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Olson, D. R., & Doherty, M. (1993). Reflecting on scientific thinking: children's understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relation. Child Development, 64, 1617–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96, 488–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Çam, A. (2011). Elementary children's judgments of the epistemic status of sources of justification. Science Education, 95, 383–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharrer, L., Bromme, R., Britt, M. A., & Stadtler, M. (2012). The seduction of easiness: How science depictions influence laypeople's reliance on their own evaluation of scientific information. Learning and Instruction, 22, 231–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S., & John, J. (1995). Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 131–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Raghavan, K., & Reiner, M. (1991). Causal models and experimentation strategies in scientific reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 201–238.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, L., & Bonawitz, E.B. (2007). Serious fun: Preschoolers play more when evidence is confounded. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1045–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sodian, B., & Barchfeld, P. (2011). Development of cognitive flexibility and epistemological understanding in argumentation. In J. Elen, E. Stahl, R. Bromme, & G. Clarebout (Eds.), Links between beliefs and cognitive flexibility: lessons learned (pp. 141–156). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sodian, B., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1991). Young children's differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development, 62, 753–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, H. M. (2010). Understanding the psychological world: Developing a theory of mind. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development ( 2nd ed., pp. 167–187). London, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27, 172–223. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar