Measuring Cognitive Engagement With Self-Report Scales: Reflections From Over 20 Years of Research

REFERENCES

• Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 811–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51, 355–365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1979). An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 385–395). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Johnson, A. M., & Chauncey, A. D. (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes during hypermedia learning: Issues and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 45, 210–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95, 1049–1065. doi:10.1002/sce.20462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 309–336). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by expert and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R, & Farr, P. J. (1993). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). A cyclical self-regulatory account of student engagement: Theoretical foundations and applications. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 237–257). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
   Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, D. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2012). A critical discussion of deep and surface processing: What it means, how it is measured, the role of context, and model specification. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 499–567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9198-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 ´ 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & Entwistle, D. M. (1970). The relationships between personality, study methods and academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 132–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1970.tb02113.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 325–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1982). Understanding student learning. London, England: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, M. W., & Eysenck, M.C. (1979). Processing depth, elaboration of encoding, memory stores, and expended processing capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning And Memory, 5, 472–484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.5.472
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, X., Thomas, M. K., & Greene, B. A. (2006). Technology-rich ethnography for examining the transition to authentic problem solving in a high school computer programming class. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 319–352.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1159–1176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 127–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D., Baker, R. S., & Wixon, M. B. (this issue). Operationalizing and detecting disengagement within online science microworlds. Educational Psychologist, 50.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement and depth of processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 187–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A. (2010). Teacher quality and student success: Testing the K20 Science Professional Development Model (K20 Science) for Rural Science Teachers (NSF Final Report, Award No. 0634070).
   Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A., DeBacker, T. K., Ravindran, B., & Krows, A. J. (1999). Goals, values, and beliefs as predictors of achievement and effort in high school mathematics classes. Sex Roles, 40, 421–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A., Dillon, C., & Crynes, B. (2003). Distributive learning in introductory chemical engineering: Two studies of university students’ learning, motivation, and attitudes using a CD-ROM. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29, 189–207.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A., Dillon, C., Miller, R. B., Davis, K. A., & Mason, B. A. (2007, April). College student achievement in physics: Is it really all about the formulas? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A., Dillon, C., Miller, R. B., Davis, K. A., Nelson, D., & Brammer, C. (2007, April). Changes in motivation and cognitive engagement across a semester: When the going gets tough, the tough get going. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1993, April). Influences on course performance: Goals, perceived ability, and self-regulation. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on course achievement: Goals, Perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, C. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 462–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2010). The measurement of learners’ self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45, 203–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heddy, B. C., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Transforming misconceptions: Using transformative experience to promote positive affect and conceptual change in students learning about biological evolution, Science Education, 97, 723–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, K. (1999). Relating students' personal frameworks for science learning to their cognition in collaborative contexts. Science Education, 83, 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 113–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabenick, S. A., Woolley, M. E., Friedel, J. M., Ammon, B. V., Blazevski, J., Bonney, C., & Kelly, K. L. (2007). Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: Do they think what we mean?. Educational Psychologist, 42, 139–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520701416231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardash, C. M., & Amlund, J. T. (1991). Self-reported learning strategies and learning from expository text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 117–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(91)90032-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 261–280. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709904773839879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, 15, 41–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663246.006
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Task engagement and conceptual change in middle school science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 585–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, W. (1987). Future time perspective, motivation and school performance. In E. De Corte, H. Lodewijks, R. Parmentier, & P. Span (Eds.), Learning and instruction: European research in an international context ( Vol. 1, pp. 181–189). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Student's goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. B., Behrens, J. T., Greene, B. A., & Newman, D. (1993). Goals and perceived ability: Impact on student valuing, self-regulation and persistence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 2–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1993.1002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review 16, 9–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. B., DeBacker, T. K., & Greene, B. A. (1999). Perceived instrumentality and academics: The link to task valuing. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26, 250–260.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A., Montalvo, G. P, Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2007). Using a multitrait-multimethod analysis to examine conceptual similarities of three self-regulated learning inventories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 177–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709905´90876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13, 59–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13598130220132316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolen, S. (2003). Learning environment, motivation, and achievement in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 347–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.10080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolen, S. B., & Haladyna, T. M. (1990a). Motivation and studying in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 115–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolen, S. B., & Haladyna, T. M. (1990b). Personal and environmental influences on students’ beliefs about effective study strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 116–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(90)90011-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 325–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement ( Vol. 7, pp. 371–402). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences (pp. 149–183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Koskey, K. K., Stewart, V. C., & Manzey, C. (2010). Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: a study of deep engagement in science. Science Education, 94, 1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravindran, B., Greene, B. A., & DeBacker, T. B. (2005). The role of goals and beliefs in the prediction of pre-service teachers’ cognitive engagement and knowledge integration. Journal of Educational Research, 98, 222–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynor,, J. O. (1974a). Future orientation in the study of achievement motivation. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Motivation and achievement (pp. 121–154). New York, NY: V. H. Winston & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Raynor, J. O. (1974b). Relationship between achievement-related motives, future orientation, and academic performance. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Motivation and achievement (pp. 173–180). New York, NY: V. H. Winston & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Raynor, J. O., Atkinson, J. W., & Brown, M. (1974). Subjective aspects of achievement motivation immediately before an examination. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Motivation and achievement (pp. 155–171). New York, NY: Winston & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., & Bachrach, J. E. (this issue). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., & Lombardi, D. (this issue). Coding classroom interactions for collective and individual engagement. Educational Psychologist, 50.
   Google Scholar
• Schmeck, R. R., Ribich, F., & Ramanaiah, N. (1977). Development of a self-report inventory for assessing individual differences in learning processes. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 413–431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100310
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert, T. L. (1993). The effects of elaborative interrogation with prose passages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 642–651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R.S. (1988). Individual differences in strategy choices: Good students, not-so-good students, and perfectionists. Child Development, 59, 833–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., Lombardi, D. (this issue). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, J. B., & Marshall, J. C. (2013). Interactions between classroom discourse, teacher questioning, and student cognitive engagement in middle school science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 249–267.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanou, C., & Parkes, J. (2003). Effects of classroom assessment on student motivation in fifth-grade science. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 152–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220670309598803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. K., Ge, X., & Greene, B. A. (2011). Fostering 21st Century skill development by engaging students in authentic game design projects in a high school computer programming class. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44, 391–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gog, T., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2011). Effects of worked examples, example-problem, and problem-example pairs on novices' learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 212–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderStoep, S., Pintrich, P. R., & Fagerlin, A. (1996). Disciplinary differences in self-regulated learning in college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 345–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walden, S. E., Greene, B. A., Slater, J., Lubin, I., & Keesee, M. S. (2009, August). Collaboration between science teachers and university scientists: Inquiry-oriented professional development. Paper presented at the 2009 Biennial Conference Meeting of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C. O., & Greene, B. A. (2009). The relations between student motivational beliefs and cognitive engagement in high school. Journal of Educational Research, 102, 463–472.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1972). Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research, 42, 203–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543042002203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. E. (1987). LASSI user's manual. Clearwater, FL: H & H.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D. R., & Schulte, A. C. (1987). LASSI: Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Clearwater, FL: H & H.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 267–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.517150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C., Pintrich, P. R., & Karabenick, S. A. (2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In K. A. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development: What do children need to flourish? (pp. 251–270). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 34, 451–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar