4,959
Views
75
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Situating Motivation

, &

REFERENCES

  • Anagnostopoulos, D., Smith, E. R., & Basmadjian, K. G. (2007). Bridging the university school-divide: Horizontal expertise and the “Two-Worlds Pitfall.” Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 138–152.
  • Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
  • Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematical worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 45–82). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 3–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Campbell, S. S. (2012). Taking it to the field: Novice teacher learning about equity-oriented mathematics teaching in a mediated field experience ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
  • Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1989). Young children's emotional acts while doing mathematical problem-solving. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 279–311. http://dx.doi.org.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/10.17763/haer.61.3.q671413614502746
  • Dreier, O. (2009). Persons in structures of social practice. Theory & Psychology, 19, 193–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354309103539
  • Dreier, O. (2011). Personality and the conduct of everyday life. Nordic Psychology, 63(2), 4–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276/a000030
  • Duda, J. L., Papaioannou, A. G., Appleton, P. R., Quested, E., & Krommidas, C. (2014). Creating adaptive motivational climates in sport and physical education. In A. G. Papaioannou & D. Hackfort (Eds.), Routledge companion to sport and exercise psychology: Global perspectives and fundamental concepts. (pp. 544–558). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
  • Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023952
  • Elliott, J. G., Hufton, N., Willis, W., & Illushin, L. (2005). Motivation, engagement, and educational performance: International perspectives on the contexts for learning. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Engle, R. A. (2012). The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts, and developments. In D. Y. Dai (Ed.), Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings : Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning (pp. 161–200). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399–483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2004_1
  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (1998). Teachers as teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 21, 63–74.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1985). Pitfalls of experience in teacher preparation. Teachers College Record, 87, 53–65.
  • Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92, 404–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20263
  • Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148–162.
  • Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Educational Research, 25, 99–125.
  • Geertz, C. J. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Gilbert, M. C., Musu-Gillette, L. E., Woolley, M. E., Karabenick, S. A., Strutchens, M. E., & Martin, W. G. (2014). Student perceptions of the classroom environment: Relations to motivation and achievement in mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 17, 287–304.
  • Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 257–293.
  • Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.
  • Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gresalfi, M. S. (2009). Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 327–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508400903013470
  • Gresalfi, M. S., Martin, T., Hand, V., & Greeno, J. (2008). Constructing competence: an analysis of student participation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 49–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9141-5
  • Hall, R., & Jurow, A. S. (2015/this issue). Changing concepts in activity: Descriptive and design studies of consequential learning in conceptual practices. Educational Psychologist, 50, 173–189.
  • Hand, V. M. (2010). The co-construction of opposition in a low-track mathematics classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 97–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831209344216
  • Hand, V., & Gresalfi, M. (2015/this issue). The joint accomplishment of identity. Educational Psychologist, 50, 190–203.
  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.
  • Hedegaard, M. (2012). Analyzing children's learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness approach. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19, 127–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.665560
  • Hickey, D. T. (2003). Engaged participation versus marginal nonparticipation: A stridently sociocultural approach to achievement motivation. Elementary School Journal, 103, 401–429.
  • Hickey, D. T. (2011). Participation by design: Improving individual motivation by looking beyond it. In D. M. McInnerny, R. A. Walker, G. A. Liem, D. M. McInnerny, R. A. Walker, & G. A. Liem (Eds.), Sociocultural theories of learning and motivation: Looking back, looking forward (Vol. 10, pp. 137–161). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Hickey, D. T., & Granade, J. B. (2004). The influence of sociocultural theory on our theories of engagement and motivation. In D. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (Vol. 4, pp. 200–223). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Hickey, D. T., & Jameson, E. (2012). Designing for Participation in educational video games. In D. Ifenthaler, D. Eseryel, & X. Ge (Eds.), Assessment in game-based learning: Foundations, innovations, and perspectives. (pp. 401–430). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
  • Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 207–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2302_2
  • Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers' conversations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 37–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1601_3
  • Horn, I. S. (2008, March). Minding the gaps: Recontextualizing teaching practices from coursework to the field Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
  • Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112, 225–259.
  • Horn, I. S., & Campbell, S. S. (2015). Developing pedagogical judgment in novice teachers: Mediated field experience as a pedagogy in teacher education. Pedagogies, 10, 149–176. http://dx.doi/org/10.1080/1554480X.2015.1021350
  • Horn, I. S., Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2013). Recontextualizing practices: Situative methods for studying the development of motivation, identity and learning in and through multiple contexts over time. In M. Vauras & S. Volet (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 188–203). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Horn, I. S., Nolen, S. B., Ward, C. J., & Campbell, S. S. (2008). Developing practices in multiple worlds: The role of identity in learning to teach. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35, 61–72.
  • Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 151–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x
  • King, R. B., & McInerney, D. M. (2014). Culture's consequences on student motivation: Capturing cross-cultural universality and variability through personal investment theory. Educational Psychologist, 49, 175–198.
  • Kurth, L. A., Anderson, C. W., & Palincsar, A. S. (2002). The case of Carla: Dilemmas of helping all students to understand science. Science Education, 86, 287–313.
  • Lampert, M., Boerst, T., & Graziani, F. (2011). Organizational Resources in the Service of School-Wide Ambitious Teaching Practice. Teachers College Record, 113, 1361–1400.
  • Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 273–290.
  • Maehr, M., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.
  • Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79, 327–365.
  • McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44, 137–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832384
  • Meece, J. L. (1991). The classroom context and students' motivational goals. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 261–285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Nasir, N. S. (2011). Racialized identities: Race and achievement among African American youth. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Nasir, N. S., & Cooks, J. (2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40, 41–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.15481492.2009.01027.x
  • Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 143–179.
  • Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Nicholls, J. G., Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & Patashnick, M. (1990). Assessing students' theories of success in mathematics: Individual and classroom differences. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 109–122.
  • Nolen, S. B. (2001). Constructing literacy in the kindergarten: Task structure, collaboration and motivation. Cognition & Instruction, 19, 95–142.
  • Nolen, S. B. (2007a). The role of literate communities in the development of children's interest in writing. In P. Boscolo & S. Hidi (Eds.), Writing and motivation (pp. 241–255). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  • Nolen, S. B. (2007b). Young children's motivation to read and write: Development in social contexts. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 219–270.
  • Nolen, S. B., Horn, I. S., Ward, C. J., & Childers, S. (2011). Assessment tools as boundary objects in novice teachers' learning. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 88–122.
  • Nolen, S. B., Tierney, G., Goodell, A., Lee, N., & Abbott, R. (2014, June). Designing for engagement in environmental science: becoming “Environmental Citizens.” Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO.
  • Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2008). Sociocultural and situative approaches to studying motivation. In M. L. Maehr, S. Karabenick, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Social psychological perspective on motivation and achievement (Vol. 15, pp. 425–460). London, UK: Emerald Press.
  • Nolen, S. B., Ward, C. J., & Horn, I. S. (2011). Motivation, engagement, and identity: Opening a conversation. In D. M. McInnerny, R. A. Walker, & G. A. Liem (Eds.), Sociocultural theories of learning and motivation: Looking back, looking forward. (Vol. 10, pp. 109–135). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Nolen, S. B., Ward, C. J., Horn, I. S., Childers, S., Campbell, S. S., & Mahna, K. (2009). Motivation development in novice teachers: The development of utility filters. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 265–278). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber.
  • Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (1990). Tracking and ability grouping: A structural barrier to access and achievement. In J. I. Goodlad, P. Keating, J. I. Goodlad, & P. Keating (Eds.), Access to knowledge: An agenda for our nation's schools. (pp. 187–204). New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
  • Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40, 331–337.
  • Plaut, V. C., & Markus, H. R. (2005). The “Inside” story: A cultural-historical analysis of being smart and motivated, American style. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 457–488). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
  • Schademan, A. R. (2011). What does playing cards have to do with science? A resource-rich view of African American young men. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 361–380
  • Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L. S., & Johnson, T. S. (2003). The twisting path of concept development in learning to teach. Teachers College Record, 105, 1399–1436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00296
  • Thompson, J. (2014). Engaging girls' sociohistorical identities in science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 392–446.
  • Turner, J. C., Christensen, A., Kackar-Cam, H. Z., Trucano, M., & Fulmer, S. M. (2014). Enhancing students' engagement: Report of a 3-year intervention with middle school teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 1195–1226. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831214532515
  • Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., Kang, Y., & Patrick, H. (2002). The classroom environment and students' reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 88–106.
  • Turner, J. C., Warzon, K. B., & Christensen, A. (2011). Motivating mathematics learning: Changes in teachers' practices and beliefs during a nine-month collaboration. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 718–762. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831210385103
  • Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Elliot, A. J., Soenens, B., & Mouratidis, A. (2014). Moving the achievement goal approach one step forward: Toward a systematic examination of the autonomous and controlled reasons underlying achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 49, 153–174.
  • Ward, C. J., Nolen, S. B., & Horn, I. S. (2011). Productive friction: How conflict in student teaching creates opportunities for learning at the boundary. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 14–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.004
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wentzel, K. (1996). Social and academic motivation in middle school:Concurrent and long-term relations to academic effort. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16, 390–406.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
  • Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wortham, S. (2008). The objectification of identity across events. Linguistics and Education, 19, 294–311.
  • Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.
  • Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1998). The interactive constitution of mathematical meaning in one second grade classroom: An illustrative example. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17, 469–488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00003-6
  • Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671
  • Zusho, A., & Clayton, K. (2011). Culturalizing achievement goal theory and research. Educational Psychologist, 46, 239–260.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.