2,118
Views
65
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Joint Accomplishment of Identity

&

REFERENCES

  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.
  • Anderman, E. M., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Roeser, R., Wigfield, A., & Blumenfeld, P. (2001). Learning to value mathematics and reading: Relations to mastery and performance-oriented instructional practices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 76–95.
  • Barron, B. (2010). Conceptualizing and tracing learning pathways over time and setting. NSSE Yearbook, 109, 113–127.
  • Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin'! Agency, identity, and science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 187–229.
  • Bateson, G. (1972). A theory of play and fantasy. In G. Bateson (Ed.), Steps to an ecology of mind: A revolutionary approach to man's understanding of himself (pp. 177–193). New York, NY: Ballantine.
  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Bell, P., Tzou, C., Bricker, L., & Baines, A. (2012). Learning in diversities of structures of social practice: Accounting for how, why and where people learn science. Human Development, 55, 269–284.
  • Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171–200). Westport, CT: Ablex.
  • Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of railside school. Teachers College Record, 110, 608–645.
  • Burke, K. (1941). The philosophy of literary form: Studies in symbolic action. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
  • Calabrese, A. B., Kang, H., Tan, E., O'Neill, T., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls' identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 37–75.
  • Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge—and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 459–485.
  • Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68.
  • Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Dreier, O. (1999). Personal trajectories of participation across context of social practice. Outlines, 4, 5–31.
  • Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children's self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.
  • Engle, R., Lam, D., Meyer, X., & Nix, S. (2012). How does expansive framing promote transfer? Several proposed explanations and a research agenda for investigating them. Educational Psychologist, 47, 215–231.
  • Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 451–498.
  • Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399–483.
  • Erickson, F. (1985). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Teaching.
  • Erickson, F. (1987). Transformation and school success: The politics and culture of educational achievement. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 18, 335–356.
  • Esmonde, I. (2009). Mathematics learning in groups: Analysing equity in two cooperative activity structures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 247–284.
  • Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2010). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 288–315.
  • Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90, 453–467.
  • Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Greeno, J. (2009). A theory bite on contextualizing, framing, and positioning: A companion to son and goldstone. Cognition and Instruction, 27, 269–275.
  • Greeno, J., & Gresalfi, M. (2008). Opportunities to learn in practice and identity. In P. Moss, D. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. Haertel, & J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 170–199). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Greeno, J. G., & MMAP. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.
  • Gresalfi, M. (2004). Taking up opportunities to learn: Examining the construction of participatory mathematical identities in middle school students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Gresalfi, M. (2009). Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 327–369.
  • Gresalfi, M. S., Barnes, J., & Cross, D. (2012). When does an opportunity become an opportunity? Unpacking classroom practice through the lens of ecological psychology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 249–267.
  • Gresalfi, M. S., & Cobb, P. (2011). Negotiating identities for mathematics teaching in the context of professional development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42, 270–304.
  • Gresalfi, M., Martin, T., Hand, V., & Greeno, J. G. (2008). Constructing competence: An analysis of student participation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 49–70.
  • Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
  • Gutiérrez, K., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 100–117.
  • Hand, V. (2003). Reframing participation: Meaningful mathematical activity in diverse classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Hand, V. (2010). The co-construction of opposition within a low-track mathematics classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 97–132.
  • Hand, V. (2012). Seeing power and culture in mathematics learning: Teacher noticing for equitable mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 233–247
  • Hand, V. (2014). “Taking up our space”: Becoming competent learners in the mathematics classroom. In N. Nasir, N. Louie, C. Cabana, B. Shreve, & E. Woodbury (Eds.), Mathematics for equity: A framework for successful practice (pp. 91–106). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Hand, V., Penuel, W., & Gutiérrez, K. (2012). (Re)Framing educational possibility: Attending to power and equity in shaping access to and within learning opportunities. Human Development, 55, 250–268.
  • Harre, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 431–473.
  • Holland, D., & Lachicotte, W. (2007). Vygotsky, Mead, and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 101–135). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Modeling the mismatch problem in math teachers' conversations. Journal of Learning Sciences, 16, 37–79.
  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M., Rodríquez, A., & Duschl, R. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757–792.
  • Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11, 207–225. doi:10.1080/14926156.2011.595881
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning and legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leander, K. M. (2001). “This is our freedom bus going home right now”: Producing and hybridizing space-time contexts in pedagogical discourse. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 637–679.
  • Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394.
  • Lee, C. D. (2001). Is october brown chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97–141.
  • Lee, C. (2008). The centrality of culture to the scientific study of learning and development: How an ecological framework in education research facilitates civic responsibility. Educational Researcher, 37, 267–279.
  • Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 87–113.
  • Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 41–54.
  • Martin, D. (2007). Mathematics learning and participation in African American context: The co-construction of identity in two intersecting realms of experience. In N. Nasir, & P. Cobb (Eds.), Diversity, equity, and access to mathematical ideas (pp. 146–158). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • McDermott, R. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity (pp. 269–305). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503.
  • Muller, C., Riegle-Crumb, C., Schiller, K. S., Wilkinson, L., & Frank, K. A. (2010). Race and academic achievement in racially diverse high schools: Opportunity and stratification. Teachers College Record, 112, 1038–1063.
  • Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 432–447.
  • Nasir, N. S. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 213–248.
  • Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Research in Education, 76, 449–475.
  • Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 143–180.
  • Nasir, N. S., Hand, V., & Taylor, E. V. (2008). Culture and mathematics in school: Boundaries between “cultural” and “domain” knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond. Review of Research in Education, 32, 187–240.
  • Nasir, N. S., & Saxe, G. B. (2003). Ethnic and academic identities: A cultural practice perspective on emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 14–18.
  • Nasir, N. S., Snyder, C. R., Shah, N., & Ross, K. M. (2012). Racial storylines and implications for learning. Human Development, 55, 285–301.
  • Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: Politics, spaces, bodies, and signed in the educational process. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Nespor, J. (2002). Networks and contexts of reform. Journal of Educational Change, 3, 365–382.
  • Nolen, S., Ward, C., & Horn, I. S. (2011). Motivation, engagement, and identity: Opening a conversation. In D. M. McInerney, R. A. Walker, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Sociocultural theories of learning and motivation: Looking back, looking forward (pp. 109–135). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (2007). Teaching to change the world. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Oakes, J., Rogers, J., & Lipton, M. (2006). Learning power : Organizing for education and justice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • O'Connor, K., & Allen, A. (2010). Learning as the organizing of social futures. In W. Penuel, & K. O'Connor (Eds.), Yearbook of the national society for the study of education (Vol. 108, pp. 160–175). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Packer, M., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35, 227–241.
  • Penuel, W. R., & Wertsch, J. V. (1995). Vygotsky and identity formation: A sociocultural approach. Educational Psychologist, 30, 83–92.
  • Polman, J. L., & Miller, D. (2010). Changing stories: Trajectories of identification among African American youth in a science outreach apprenticeship. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 879–918.
  • Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Roth, W. M., Tobin, K., Elmesky, R., Carambo, C., McKnight, Y. M., & Beers, J. (2004). Re/making identities in the praxis of urban schooling: A cultural historical perspective. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 48–69.
  • Sameroff, A. J., & MacKenzie, M. J. (2003). Research strategies for capturing transactional models of development: The limits of the possible. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 613–640.
  • Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (2009). Student behavior and epistemological framing: Examples from collaborative active-learning activities in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 27, 147–174.
  • Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.
  • Spencer, M. B. (1999). Social and cultural influences on school adjustment: The application of an identity-focused cultural ecological perspective. Educational Psychologist, 34(1), 43–57.
  • Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
  • Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in discourse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Leaning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.
  • Wortham, S. (2003). Curriculum as a resource for the development of social identity. Sociology of Education, 76, 228–246.
  • Wortham, S. (2004). The interdependence of social identification and learning. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 715–750.
  • Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.