Commentary: Some Prospects for Connecting Concepts and Methods of Individual Cognition and of Situativity

REFERENCES

• Bang, M. (2015/this issue). Culture, learning, and development and the natural word: The influences of situative perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 50, 220–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2012). Concept formation in the wild. Mind, Culture and Activity, 19, 201–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 451–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell/Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (2011). A situative perspective on cognition and learning in interaction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), Theories of learning and studies of instructional practice (pp. 41–71). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (in press). Another candidate for relating knowledge analysis and interaction analysis: Mitchell's integrative pluralism. In A. A. diSessa, M. Levin, & N. J. S. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction: A synthetic agenda for the learning sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., & Engeström Y. (2014). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, second edition (pp. 128–147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., & the Middle-School Mathematics through Applications Project (MMAP) Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresalfi, M. S. (2009). Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 327–369.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Horn, I. S. (2012). Talk and conceptual change at work: Adequate representation and epistemic stance in a comparative analysis of statistical consulting and teacher workgroups. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19, 240–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Jurow, A. S. (2015/this issue). Changing concepts in activity: Descriptive and design studies of consequential learning in conceptual practices. Educational Psychologist, 50, 173–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, V., & Gresalfi, M. (2015/this issue). The joint accomplishment of identity. Educational Psychologist, 50, 190–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Malmberg, J. (2015/this issue). Understanding regulated learning in situative and contextual frameworks. Educational Psychologist, 50, 204–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2007). Introduction: Bridging the cognitive and sociocultural approaches in research on conceptual change: Is it feasible? Educational Psychologist, 42, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. D. (2003). Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nolen, S. B., Horn, I. S., & Ward, C. J. (2015/this issue). Situating motivation. Educational Psychologist, 50, 234–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, G. B., de Kirby, K., Kang, B., & Schneider, M. L. (2015). Studying cognition through time in a classroom community: The interplay between “Everyday” and “Scientific Concepts.” Human Development, 58, 5–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenning, K., Greeno, J. G., Hall, R., Sommerfeld, M. & Wiebe, M. (2002), Coordinating mathematical with biological multiplication: Conceptual learning as the development of heterogeneous reasoning systems. In P. Brna, M. Baker, K. Stenning, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), The role of communication in learning to model (pp. 3–48). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (2007). Human–machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions: The problem of human–computer communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original Plans and Situated Actions published 1987)
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar