Plausibility Judgments in Conceptual Change and Epistemic Cognition

REFERENCES

• Bailey, J. M., & Slater, T. F. (2003). A review of astronomy education research. Astronomy Education Review, 2(2), 20–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2003015
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2012). Epistemic thinking in action: evaluating and integrating online sources. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 39–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.636495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, A., Freeman, P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1986). Plausibility and the comprehension of text. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 51–60. http://dx.doi.org/0.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb01980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95, 639–669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J. F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 48–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2014). Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 58–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Britt, M. A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students' construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 6–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 87, 181–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.10105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. F., Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (1998). Explanation in scientists and children. Minds and Machines, 8, 119–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008242619231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2009). Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 49–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463280802643640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Richter, T., & Rouet, J. F. (2014). Scientific literacy: The role of goal-directed reading and evaluation in understanding scientific information. Educational Psychologist, 49, 104–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1993). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, F. (2014, January 6). Will the sun explode? Universe Today. Retrieved from http://www.universetoday.com/107791/will-the-sun-explode/
   Google Scholar
• Cavagnetto, A., & Hand, B. (2012). The importance of embedding argument within science classrooms. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation (pp. 39–53). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2470-9_3
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 14, 161–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 3–27). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C., & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science education. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543063001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. (2001). Models of data: A theory of how people evaluate data. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 323–398. http://dx.doi.1725org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C., & Buckland, L. (2012). Model-based instruction: Fostering change in evolutionary conceptions and epistemic practices. In K. S. Rosengren, E. M. Evans, S. Brem, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 211–232). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46, 141–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Duschl, R. A., Duncan, R. G., Buckland, L. A., & Pluta, W. J. (2008). A microgenetic classroom study of learning to reason scientifically through modeling and argumentation. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference for the learning sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 14–15). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1241–1257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660301007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Michalski, R. (1989). The logic of plausible reasoning: A core theory. Cognitive Science, 13, 1–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1301_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Keane, M. T. (2004). What plausibly affects plausibility? Concept coherence and distributional word coherence as factors influencing plausibility judgments. Memory & Cognition, 32, 185–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Keane, M. T. (2006). A model of plausibility. Cognitive Science, 30, 95–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J. (2010). Solar activity and climate: Is the sun causing global warming? Skeptical Science. Retrieved from http://www.skepticalscience.com
   Google Scholar
• de Pereyra, G., Britt, M. A., Braasch, J. L., & Rouet, J. F. (2014). Reader's memory for information sources in simple news stories: Effects of text and task features. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 187–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.879152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A. (2000). Readers, texts and conceptual change learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16, 99–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105735600277980
   Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33, 109–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, P. T., & Zimmerman, M. K. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. EOS Transactions, 90, 22–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009EO030002
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0091732×07309371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
   Google Scholar
• Ebert, P. A., & Smith, M. (2012). Introduction: Outright belief and degrees of belief. Dialectica, 66, 305–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2012.01306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 217–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. K. (1962). Explanation, reduction and empiricism. In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. 3: Scientific explanation, space, and time (pp. 28–97). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, N., & Halpern, J. Y. (2001). Plausibility measures and default reasoning. Journal of the ACM, 47, 648–685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/502090.502092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., & Gottfried, G. M. (1994). Essentialist beliefs in children: The acquisition of concepts and theories. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 341–365). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. (2010). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goel, V., & Vartanian, O. (2011). Negative emotions can attenuate the influence of beliefs on logical reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 121–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931003593942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. A., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43, 142–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520802178458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers' cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 147–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023477131081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education to promote conceptual change in science. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 116–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G. H. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. The Philosophical Review, 74, 88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze, S. R., Slaten, D. G., Horton, W. S., Jenkins, R., & Rapp, D. N. (2014). Pilgrims sailing the Titanic: Plausibility effects on memory for misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 42, 305–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0359-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J. (2005). Analogy. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 117–142). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. K., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of obvious change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hynd, C. R. (2001). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 699–714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00010-1
   Google Scholar
• Isberner, M. B., & Richter, T. (2013). Can readers ignore implausibility? Evidence for nonstrategic monitoring of event-based plausibility in language comprehension. Acta Psychologica, 142, 15–22. http://dx.doi.org/0.1016/j.actpsy.2012.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isberner, M. B., & Richter, T. (2014). Comprehension and validation: Separable stages of information processing? A case for epistemic monitoring in language comprehension. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 245–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. L., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Use of task-value instructional inductions for facilitating engagement and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 51–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64, 515–526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapon, S., & diSessa, A. A. (2012). Reasoning through instructional analogies. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 261–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2012.689385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisiting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39, 5–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, M. W., & Gerhart, J. C. (2005). The plausibility of life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2009). The importance of learning about knowing: Creating a foundation for development of intellectual values. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Pearsall, S. (2000). Developmental origins of scientific thinking. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 113–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0101N_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudan, R., & Laudan, L. (1989). Dominance and the disunity of method: Solving the problems of innovation and consensus. Philosophy of Science, 56, 221–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughlin, R. B. (2010). What the earth knows: Understanding the concept of geologic time and some basic science can give a new perspective on climate change and the energy future. The American Scholar, 79, 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916–929. "http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<916::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeMaire, P., & Fayol, M. (1995). When plausibility judgments supersede fact retrieval: The example of odd-even effect on product verification. Memory and Cognition, 23, 34–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. K. (1986). Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities II. Philosophical Review, 85, 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A. (2007). The role of affect in student learning: A multi-dimensional approach to considering the interaction of affect, motivation, and engagement. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 107–122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of motivational beliefs in conceptual change. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 115–135). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., Seyranian, V., & Sinatra, G. M. (2014). Source effects and plausibility judgments when reading about climate change. Discourse Processes, 51, 75–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.855049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., Sibley, B., & Carroll, K. (2013). What's the alternative? Using model-evidence link diagrams to weigh alternative models in argumentation. The Science Teacher, 80(5), 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., & Sinatra, G. M. (2012). College students' perceptions about the plausibility of human-induced climate change. Research in Science Education, 42, 201–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9196-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Emotions when teaching about human-induced climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 167–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.738372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2013). Plausibility reappraisals and shifts in middle school students' climate change conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 27, 50–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2012). Plausibility effects in the comprehension of controversial science texts. Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association conference—April 2012. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Ariasi, N., & Boldrin, A. (2011). Epistemic beliefs in action: Spontaneous reflections about knowledge and knowing during online information searching and their influence on learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 137–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuki, K., Chow, T., Hare, M., Elman, J. L., Scheepers, C., & McRae, K. (2011). Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 913–934. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 19, 30–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529279.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, K. E. (2004). Children's understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 219–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2202_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan R. (1988). Testing theories of scientific change. In A. Donovan, L. Laudan, & R. Laudan (Eds.), Scrutinizing science (pp. 3–44). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M. (2011). Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling: Alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education. Educational Psychologist, 46, 84–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.558816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M., & Edwards, O. V. (2011). Critical questions and argument stratagems: A framework for enhancing and analyzing students’ reasoning practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 443–488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.564567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J. (1997). History and philosophy of science and the preparation for constructivist teacher: the case of particle theory. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Noval (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 165–194). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J. V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1985). The effects of belief on the spontaneous production of syllogistic conclusions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 553–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640748508400919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Garnham, A. (1989). Believability and syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 31, 117–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90020-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, S. (2009). Resubsumption: A possible mechanism for conceptual change and belief revision. Educational Psychologist, 44, 20–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520802616267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterlind, S. J. (2010). Modern measurement: Theory, principles, and applications of mental appraisal. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R. (2011). Emotions as drivers of learning and cognitive development. In R. A. Calvo & S. K. D'Mello (Eds.), New perspectives on affect and learning technologies (pp. 23–39). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 107–122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 3rd ed., pp. 323–329). Boston, MA: McGraw–Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. B. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. (2006). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.
   Google Scholar
• Ranney, M., & Schank, P. (1998). Toward an integration of the social and the scientific: Observing, modeling, and promoting the explanatory coherence of reasoning. In S. Read & L. Miller (Eds.), Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior (pp. 245–274). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. (1976). Plausible reasoning: An introduction to the theory and practice of plausibilistic inference. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. (2003). Epistemology: An introduction to the theory of knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. (2009). Aporetics: Rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, T. (2011). Cognitive flexibility and epistemic validation in learning from multiple texts. In J. Elen, E. Stahl, R. Bromme, & G. Clarebout (Eds.), Links between beliefs and cognitive flexibility (pp. 125–140). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Schmid, S. (2010). Epistemological beliefs and epistemic strategies in self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 47–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9038-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., Schroeder, S., & Wöhrmann, B. (2009). You don't have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 538–558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, W. C. (1994). Causality without counterfactuals. Philosophy of Science, 61, 297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39, 199–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as a part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S., Richter, T., & Hoever, I. (2008). Getting a picture that is both accurate and stable: Situation models and epistemic validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 237–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtulman, A., & Valcarcel, J. (2012). Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions. Cognition, 124, 209–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The “warming trend” in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 107–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., & Broughton, S. H. (2011). Bridging reading comprehension and conceptual change in science education: The promise of refutation text. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 6–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Broughton, S. H., & Lombardi, D. (2014). Emotions in science education. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 415–436). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., & Chinn, C. (2011). Thinking and reasoning in science: Promoting epistemic conceptual change. In K. Harris, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Critical theories and models of learning and development relevant to learning and teaching (Vol. 1, pp. 257–282). Washington, DC: APA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Kardash, C. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Lombardi, D. (2012). Promoting attitude change and expressed willingness to take action toward climate change in college students. Instructional Science, 40, 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9166-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49, 123–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., & Mason, L. (2008). Beyond knowledge: Learner characteristics influencing conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510–528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.10087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerland, S. A., Sinatra, G. M., & Matthews, M. R. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 325–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011913813847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staffel, J. (2012). Can there be reasoning with degrees of belief? Synthese, 190, 3535–3551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0209-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2010). Decision making and rationality in the modern world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20, 192–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525×00057046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. (2006). Evaluating explanations in law, science, and everyday life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 141–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00424.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., & Osborne, J. (2012). Student attitudes and aspirations towards science. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 597–625). New York: NY: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, W. P. (2007). Quantitative research methods. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (2004). Abductive reasoning. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstock, M. (2011). Knowledge-telling and knowledge-transforming arguments in mock jurors' verdict justifications. Thinking & Reasoning, 17, 282–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2011.575191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. L. (1968). Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54, 59–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335636809382870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Li, N., Wang, S., Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K. (2014). Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese. Visual Cognition, 22, 193–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.890689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar