2,384
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Developmental Systems of Students' Personal Theories About Education

&

REFERENCES

  • Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2012). Reciprocal relationships between math self-concept and math anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 385–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.004
  • Alexander, P. A., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1995). Conceptions of knowledge and beliefs: A comparison across varying cultural and educational communities. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 413–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1163437
  • Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Guan, J., & Murphy, P. A. (1998). How students and teachers in Singapore and the United States conceptualize knowledge and beliefs: Positioning learning within epistemological frameworks. Learning and Instruction, 8, 97–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00004-2
  • Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Barger, M. M., Wormington, S. V., Huettel, L. G., & Linnebrink-Garcia, L. (2016). Developmental changes in college engineering students' personal epistemology profiles. Learning and Individual Differences. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.04.002
  • Belenky, M. R., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self voice and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Bergman, L. R., & Trost, K. (2006). The person-oriented versus the variable-oriented approach: Are they complementary, opposites, or exploring different worlds? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 601–632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0023
  • Bertenthal, B. I., & Fischer, K. W. (1978). Development of self-recognition in the infant. Developmental Psychology, 14, 44–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.14.1.44
  • Blackwell, L. S. (2002). Psychological mediators of student achievement during the transition to junior high school: The role of implicit theories (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). New York, NY: Columbia University.
  • Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
  • Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991). Measures of self-esteem. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 115–160). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Block, J. (1982). Assimilation, accommodation, and the dynamics of personality development. Child Development, 53, 281–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1128971
  • Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N. D., Spelke, E., & Schulz, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120, 322–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001
  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382
  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment: Attachment and loss (vol. 1). London, UK: Hogarth.
  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2004). Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 371–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.10.001
  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 539–565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709905X25067
  • Bretherton, I., & Munholland, K. A. (1999). Internal working models in attachment relationships: A construct revisited. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 89–111). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students' domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 697–726. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312042004697
  • Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2006). Examining the dual nature of epistemological beliefs. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 28–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.08.007
  • Burnette, J. L., O'Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029531
  • Burr, J. E., & Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal epistemology and theory of mind: Deciphering young children's beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 199–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(02)00010-7
  • Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-early-and late adolescents: A test of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 599–613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.599
  • Cain, K. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1989). The development of children's conceptions of intelligence: A theoretical framework. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 47–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Chandler, M. J., Hallett, D., & Sokol, B. W. (2002). Competing claims about competing knowledge claims. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 145–168). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Chen, J. A. (2012). Implicit theories, epistemic beliefs, and science motivation: A person-centered approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 724–735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.013
  • Chen, J. A., & Barger, M. M. (2016). Epistemic cognition and motivation. In J. A. Greene, W. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.) Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 425–438). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Chen, J. A., Metcalf, S. J., & Tutwiler, M. S. (2014). Motivation and beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge within an immersive virtual ecosystems environment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 112–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.004
  • Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of Grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 75–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.003
  • Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. L. A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46, 141–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
  • Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., & Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the air model of epistemic cognition. In D. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information (pp. 425–454). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chiu, C. Y., Hong, Y. Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
  • Cimpian, A. (2010). The impact of generic language about ability on children's achievement motivation. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1333–1340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019665
  • Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, L., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004
  • Craven, R. G., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). The centrality of the self-concept construct for psychological wellbeing and unlocking human potential: Implications for child and educational psychologists. Educational and Child Psychology, 25, 104–118.
  • Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (1991). Effects of internally focused feedback and attributional feedback on enhancement of academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 17–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.17
  • Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 666–679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.666
  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
  • Dweck, C. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 57–88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
  • Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit Theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256
  • Dweck, C. S., & Molden, D. C. (2005). Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 122–140). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Dweck, C. S., & Sorich, L. (1999). Mastery-oriented thinking. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping (pp. 232–251). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
  • Elder, A. D. (2002). Characterizing fifth grade students' epistemological beliefs in science. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 347–364). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concept revisited: Or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 404–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034679
  • Ferguson, L. E., & Bråten, I. (2013). Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: Changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 49–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.003
  • Feucht, F. C. (2010). Epistemic climate in elementary classrooms. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and educational implications (pp. 55–93). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Flum, H., & Kaplan, A. (2012). Identity formation in educational settings: A contextualized view of theory and research in practice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 240–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.01.003
  • Ford, M. E., & Smith, P. R. (2007). Thriving with social purpose: An integrative approach to the development of optimal human functioning. Educational Psychologist, 42, 153–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520701416280
  • Furnham, A. (2014). Increasing your intelligence: Entity and incremental beliefs about the multiple “intelligences.” Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 163–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.001
  • Gonida, E., Kiosseoglou, G., & Leondari, A. (2006). Implicit theories of intelligence, perceived academic competence, and school achievement: Testing alternative models. The American Journal of Psychology, 119, 223–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20445336
  • Gopnik, A. (2012). Scientific thinking in young children: Theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science, 337, 1623–1627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1223416
  • Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (1994). The theory theory. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 257–293). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Greene, J. A., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43, 142–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520802178458
  • Greene, J. A., Costa, L., Robertson, J., Pan, Y., & Deekens, V. M. (2010). Exploring relations among college students' prior knowledge, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning in a hypermedia environment. Computers & Education, 55, 1027–1043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.013
  • Greene, J. A., Torney-Purta, J., & Azevedo, R. (2010). Empirical evidence regarding relations among a model of epistemic and ontological cognition, academic performance, and educational level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 234–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017998
  • Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.109.1.3
  • Gunderson, E. A., Gripshover, S. J., Romero, C., Dweck, C. S., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2013). Parent praise to 1- to 3-year-olds predicts children's motivational frameworks 5 years later. Child Development, 84, 1526–1541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12064
  • Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hansford, B. C, & Hattie, J. A. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52, 123–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1170275
  • Harter, S. (1988). Developmental processes in the construction of the self. In T. D. Yawkey & J. E. Johnson (Eds.), Integrative processes and socialization: Early to middle childhood (pp. 45–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Harter, S. (2012). The construction of the self: Developmental and sociocultural foundations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1026
  • Hofer, B. K. (2006). Beliefs about knowledge and knowing: Integrating domain specificity and domain generality: A response to Muis, Bendixen, and Haerle (2006). Educational Psychology Review, 18, 67–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9000-9
  • Hofer, B. K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2012). Personal epistemology: Theory, research, and future directions. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 227–256). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children's self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00421
  • James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
  • Jehng, J. C. J., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and students' epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 23–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1993.1004
  • Job, V., Dweck, C. S., & Walton, G. M. (2010). Ego depletion-Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21, 1686–1693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384745
  • Jonkmann, K., Becker, M., Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2012). Personality traits moderate the Big-Fish–Little-Pond Effect of academic self-concept. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 736–746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.020
  • King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • King, P. M., Kitchener, K. S., Davison, M. L., Parker, C. A., & Wood, P. K. (1983). The justification of beliefs in young adults: A longitudinal study. Human Development, 26, 106–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000272874
  • Kinlaw, R. C., & Kurtz-Costes, B. (2003). The development of children's beliefs about intelligence. Developmental Review, 23, 125–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-2297(03)00010-8
  • Kitchener, K. S., & King, P. M. (1981). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 89–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(81)90032-0
  • Krettenauer, T. (2005). The role of epistemic cognition in adolescent identity formation: Further evidence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 185–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-4300-9
  • Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7
  • Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347, 262–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375
  • Li, J., Fung, H., Bakeman, R., Rae, K., & Wei, W. (2014). How European American and Taiwanese mothers talk to their children about learning. Child Development, 85, 1206–1221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12172
  • Luce, M. R., Callanan, M. A., & Smilovic, S. (2013). Links between parents' epistemological stance and children's evidence talk. Developmental Psychology, 49, 454–461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031249
  • Maggioni, L., Riconscente, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2006). Perceptions of knowledge and beliefs among undergraduate students in Italy and in the United States. Learning and Instruction, 16, 467–491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.006
  • Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Magnusson, D., & Cairns, R. B. (1996). Developmental science: Toward a unified framework. In R. B. Cairns & G. H. Elder (Eds.), Developmental science (pp. 7–30). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Markus, H., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 858–866. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.858
  • Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503
  • Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.417
  • Marsh, H. W. (1990a). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 646–656.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1990b). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 623–636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.623
  • Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1988). A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 366–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.366
  • Marsh, H. W., Craven, R., & Debus, R. (1998). Structure, stability, and development of young children's self-concepts: A multicohort–multioccasion study. Child Development, 69, 1030–1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06159.x
  • Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562–582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
  • Marsh, H. W., & O'Mara, A. (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 542–552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312313
  • Marsh, H. W., & Seaton, M. (2013). Academic self-concept. In J. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 62–63). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 397–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x
  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: Construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement. Journal of Personality, 74, 403–456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00380.x
  • Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010). Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: are students epistemically active? Instructional Science, 38, 607–633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9089-y
  • Mason, L., Boscolo, P., Tornatora, M., & Ronconi, L. (2013). Besides knowledge: a cross-sectional study on the relations between epistemic beliefs, achievement goals, self-beliefs, and achievement in science. Instructional Science, 41, 49–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9210-0
  • Mason, L., & Scrivani, L. (2004). Enhancing students' mathematical beliefs: An intervention study. Learning and Instruction, 14, 153–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.002
  • Meeus, W., Iedema, J., Helsen, M., & Vollebergh, W. (1999). Patterns of adolescent identity development: Review of literature and longitudinal analysis. Developmental Review, 19, 419–461.
  • Miele, D. B., Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). Children's naive theories of intelligence influence their metacognitive judgments. Child Development, 84, 1879–1886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12101
  • Miller, P. H. (2011). Theories of developmental psychology (5th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
  • Miu, A. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Preventing symptoms of depression by teaching adolescents that people can change: Effects of a brief incremental theory of personality intervention at 9-month follow-up. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 726–743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2167702614548317
  • Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61, 192–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192
  • Molloy, L. E., Ram, N., & Gest, S. D. (2011). The storm and stress (or calm) of early adolescent self-concepts: Within-and between-subjects variability. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1589–1607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025413
  • Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
  • Muenks, K., Miele, D. B., Ramani, G. B., Stapleton, L. M., & Rowe, M. L. (2015). Parental beliefs about the fixedness of ability. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 41, 78–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2015.08.002
  • Muis, K. R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 74, 317–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003317
  • Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42, 173–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520701416306
  • Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6
  • Muis, K. R., & Duffy, M. C. (2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students' beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 213–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029690
  • Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., Heddy, B. C. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 39, 168–183. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.003
  • Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.
  • Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13, 59–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13598130220132316
  • Nicholls, J. G. (1990). What is ability and why are we mindful of it? A developmental perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kolligian (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 11–40). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Students as educational theorists. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 267–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Nichols, J. D., White, J. J., & Price, M. (2006). Beliefs of intelligence, knowledge acquisition, and motivational orientation: A comparative analysis of Hispanic/Latino and Anglo youth. Multicultural Perspectives, 8, 39–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327892mcp0804_7
  • O'Mara, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. L. (2006). Do self-concept interventions make a difference? A synergistic blend of construct validation and meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 41, 181–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_4
  • Ommundsen, Y., Haugen, R., & Lund, T. (2005). Academic self-concept, implicit theories of ability, and self-regulation strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 461–474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313830500267838
  • Park, D., & Kim, S. (2015). Time to move on? When entity theorists perform better than incremental theorists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 736–748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167215578028
  • Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Seaton, M., & Van Zanden, B. (2015). If one goes up the other must come down: Examining ipsative relationships between math and English self-concept trajectories across high school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 172–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12050
  • Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (1999). Student motivation and epistemological beliefs. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999, 17–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.7802
  • Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (2005). The conditional and interaction effects of epistemological beliefs on the self-regulated learning of college students: Motivational strategies. Research in Higher Education, 46, 731–768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-6224-8
  • Paulsen, M. B., & Wells, C. T. (1998). Domain differences in the epistemological beliefs of college students. Research in Higher Education, 39, 365–384.
  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years; A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15, 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000271225
  • Pintrich, P. R., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1985). Classroom experience and children's self-perceptions of ability, effort, and conduct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 646–657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.6.646
  • Pomerantz, E. M., & Kempner, S. G. (2013). Mothers' daily person and process praise: Implications for children's theory of intelligence and motivation. Developmental Psychology, 49, 2040–2046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031840
  • Pomerantz, E. M., & Saxon, J. L. (2001). Conceptions of ability as stable and self-evaluative processes: A longitudinal examination. Child Development, 72, 152–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1132477
  • Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students' learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 282–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.282
  • Robins, R. W., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1, 313–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15298860290106805
  • Sandoval, W. (2014). Science education's need for a theory of epistemological development. Science Education, 98, 383–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.21107
  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
  • Schommer, M., Calvert, C., Gariglietti, G., & Bajaj, A. (1997). The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 37–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.37
  • Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39, 19–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_3
  • Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O. K., & Barker, S. (2003). Epistemological beliefs across domains using Biglan's classification of academic disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 44, 347–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023081800014
  • Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005). Competence perceptions and academic functioning. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85–104). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Snyder, K. E., Barger, M. M., Wormington, S. V., Schwartz-Bloom, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2013). Identification as gifted and implicit beliefs about intelligence: An examination of potential moderators. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24, 242–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1932202X13507971
  • Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2003). Implicit theories about personality and intelligence and their relationship to actual personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 939–951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00310-0
  • Srinivasan, M., Dunham, Y., Hicks, C. M., & Barner, D. (2016). Do attitudes toward societal structure predict beliefs about free will and achievement? Evidence from the Indian caste system. Developmental Science, 19, 109–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.12294
  • Stipek, D., & Gralinski, J. H. (1996). Children's beliefs about intelligence and school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 397–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.397
  • Stipek, D., & Mac Iver, D. (1989). Developmental change in children's assessment of intellectual competence. Child Development, 60, 521–538. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130719
  • Thomas, A. J., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2015). Exploring the relation between people's theories of intelligence and beliefs about brain development. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–12. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00921
  • Tolhurst, D. (2007). The influence of learning environments on students' epistemological beliefs and learning outcomes. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 219–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510701191992
  • Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Epistemological beliefs, school achievement, and college major: A large-scale longitudinal study on the impact of certainty beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 348–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.11.003
  • Tsai, C. C., Jessie Ho, H. N., Liang, J. C., & Lin, H. M. (2011). Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students. Learning and Instruction, 21, 757–769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.002
  • Usher, E. L. (2009). Sources of middle school students' self-efficacy in mathematics: A qualitative investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 275–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831208324517
  • Usher, E. L. (2015). Personal capability beliefs. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 146–159). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Wellman, H. M. (1990). The child's theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02209024
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). New York, NY: Academic.
  • Wigfield, A., & Karpathian, M. (1991). Who am I and what can I do? Children's self-concepts and motivation in achievement situations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 233–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_3
  • Wildenger, L. K., Hofer, B. K., & Burr, J. E. (2010). Epistemological development in very young knowers. In L. Bendixen & F. Haerle (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 220–257). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
  • Yeager, D. S., Johnson, R., Spitzer, B. J., Trzesniewski, K. H., Powers, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). The far-reaching effects of believing people can change: Implicit theories of personality shape stress, health, and achievement during adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 867–884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036335
  • Yeager, D. S., Miu, A., Powers, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2013). Implicit theories of personality and attributions of hostile intent: A meta-analysis, an experiment, and a longitudinal intervention. Child Development, 84, 1651–1667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12062
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30, 217–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3004_8

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.