Beyond Phonics: The Case for Teaching Children the Logic of the English Spelling System

REFERENCES

• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 414–431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390050401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10, Serial No. 238).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506–521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building vocabulary inprimary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 44–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, G. H., Clark, M. C., Lesgold, A. M., & Winzenz, D. (1969). Hierarchical retrieval schemes in recall of categorized word lists. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 323–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80124-6
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. S. (2016). The practical and principled problems with educational neuroscience. Psychological Review, 123, 600–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a “hat” in “that”? Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 131–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, P. N., & Cooke, G. (2012). Morphology and the common core: Building students' understanding of the written word. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, Fall, 4, 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R. (2010). Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 515–537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9172-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654309359353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowey, J. A. (2006). Need for systematic synthetic phonics teaching within the early reading curriculum. Australian Psychologist, 41, 79–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, P., & Nunes, T. (2004). Morphology and spelling. In Handbook of children's literacy (pp. 91–118). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. J. (1998). The foundation of literacy: The child's acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camilli, G., Vargas, S., & Yurecko, M. (2003). Teaching children to read: The fragile link between science & federal education policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008131926604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 464–487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., Hogan, T. P., & Weismer, S. E. (2005). Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders?. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1378–1396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, C. (1970). Reading, writing, and phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 287–309. 10.17763/haer.40.2.y7u0242x76w05624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Felicetti, T., Kneipp, S., … Catanese, J. (2005). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 1681–1692. 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, D. L., Miller, A. C., Elleman, A. M., & Steacy, L. M. (2014). Have we forsaken reading theory in the name of “quick fix” interventions for children with reading disability?. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 55–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.836200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the english language (2nd Edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (2013). Spell it out: The curious, enthralling and extraordinary story of english spelling. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. (2006a). Getting to the root: Young writers' sensitivity to the role of root morphemes in the spelling of inflected and derived words. Journal of Child Language, 33, 401–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. (2006b). This turnip's not for turning: Children's morphological awareness and their use of root morphemes in spelling. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 567–575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151005X50834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2013). English programmes of study: Key Stages 1 and 2. National curriculum in England. London, UK: Crown Copyright.
   Google Scholar
• Devonshire, V., & Fluck, M. (2010). Spelling development: Fine-tuning strategy-use and capitalising on the connections between words. Learning and Instruction, 20, 361–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devonshire, V., Morris, P., & Fluck, M. (2013). Spelling and reading development: The effect of teaching children multiple levels of representation in their orthography. Learning and Instruction, 25, 85–94. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge, MA: Rive.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, F. J., & Clarke, P. J. (2011). Practitioner review: Reading disorders: What are the effective interventions and how should they be implemented and evaluated?. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 3–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02310.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14, 135–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1057356980140202
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. G., McPhail, J. C., & Berndt, J. A. (2002). Sixth graders' views of activities that do and do not help them learn. The Elementary School Journal, 335–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Galuschka, K., Ise, E., Krick, K., & Schulte-Koerne, G. (2014). Effectiveness of treatment approaches for children and adolescents with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plos One, 9(8), e105843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 257–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.689791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., Hodges, R. E., & Rudorf, E. H. (1966). Phoneme–grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., Miles, J. N. V., Carroll, J. M., Hatcher, J., Gibbs, S., &, et al. (2006). Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 820–827. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01559.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. (1984). Teaching children to spell English. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. H., & Templeton, S. (1986). A developmental perspective of formal spelling instruction through alphabet, pattern, and meaning. The Elementary School Journal, 86, 305–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, M. K. (1989). Children's word structure knowledge: Implications for decoding and spelling instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 135–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00377467
   Google Scholar
• Henry, M. K. (2010). Unlocking literacy: Effective decoding & spelling instruction. Baltimore, MD: Brookes. *Original work published 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., Katsipataki, M., & Coleman, R. (2014). Reading at the Transition. Interim evidence brief. London, UK: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J., & Taylor, T. E. (2012). The role of orthography in the semantic activation of neighbors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 38, 1259–1273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2009). Developmental disorders of language, learning and cognition. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jackman, J. (1997). Nelson Spelling. London, UK: Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, N. (2006). Children's spelling of base, inflected and derived words: Links with morphological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 737–765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9001-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2001). Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of memory and Language, 44, 592–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, J. R., & Bowers, P. N. (in press). Morphological instruction and literacy: Binding phonological, orthographic, and semantic features of words. In K. Cain, D. Compton, & R. Parrila, (Eds.), Theories of reading development. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, J. R., & Lawson, M. (2012). Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction and learning processes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Konkle, T., Brady, T. F., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2010). Conceptual distinctiveness supports detailed visual long-term memory for real-world objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, D. S. (1992). Reaction time measures of spelling: Testing a two-strategy model of skilled spelling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 765–776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.4.765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, R. F., & Snowling, M. J. (2008). Morphological spelling development. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24, 363–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573560802004449
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. W., Ransby, M. R., Hardwick, N., Johns, M. S., & Donaldson, S. A. (1989). Can dyslexia be treated? Treatment-specific and generalized treatment effects in dyslexic children's response to remediation. Brain and Language, 37, 90–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)90103-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinussen, R. L., & Kirby, J. R. (1998). Instruction in successive phonological processing to improve the reading acquisition skills of at-risk kindergarten children. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 26, 19–39.
   Google Scholar
• Marulis, L. M., & Neuman, S. B. (2010). The effects of vocabulary intervention on young children's word learning a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80, 300–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654310377087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly, I. G. (1972). Reading, the linguistic process and linguistic awareness. In J. Kavanagh & I. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye (pp. 133–147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, G., Castles, A., Kohnen, S., Larsen, L., Jones, K., Anandakumar, T., & Banales, E. (2013). Sight word and phonics training in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 391–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219413504996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, G., Eve, P. M., Jones, K., Banales, E., Kohnen, S., Anandakumar, T., &, et al. (2012, December 12). Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD009115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, G. M., Hogben, J. H., Edwards, V. T., Heath, S. M., & Mengler, E. D. (2000). On the ″specifics″ of specific reading disability and specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 869–874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, G., Kohnen, S., Jones, K., Eve, P., Banales, E., Larsen, L., & Castles, A. (2015). Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: A randomised controlled trial. PeerJ, 3, e922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, W., Hammond, L., & Fetherston, T. (2014). Strengthening vocabulary for literacy: An analysis of the use of explicit instruction techniques to improve word learning from story book read-alouds. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 19, 153–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2014.964992
   Google Scholar
• Moustafa, M., & Maldonado-Colon, E. (1998). Whole-to-parts phonics instruction: Building on what children know to help them know more. The Reading Teacher, 52, 448–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, W. E., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, K., & Cocksey, J. (2009). Beginning readers activate semantics from sub-word orthography. Cognition, 110, 273–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997). Children's understanding of the connection between grammar and spelling. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 219–240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Olsson, J. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 289–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, R. E., & Padeliadu, S. (2000). Blending versus whole word approaches in first grade remedial reading: Short-term and delayed effects on reading and spelling words. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 159–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008134818771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 3–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (2002). How predictable is spelling? Developing and testing metrics of phoneme-grapheme contingency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 55, 897–915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980143000640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modelling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, D. K. (2008). A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in Grades K–12. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 23, 36–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00261.x
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., Finn, B., & Weinstein, Y. (2012). Applications of cognitive science to education. In S. Della Salla & M. Anderson (Eds.), Neuroscience in education: The good, the bad and the ugly (pp. 128–151). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 242–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading: Interim report. Literacy Today, 45, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J. (2009). Identifying and teaching children and young people with dyslexia and literacy difficulties. London, UK: Department for Children, Schools and Families. Retrieved from http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/wholeschool/sen/
   Google Scholar
• Schonell, F., & Goodacre, E. (1971). The psychology and teaching of reading. London, UK: Oliver & Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S. (2011). Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In P. McCardle, J. Ren, & O. Tzeng (Eds.), Dyslexia across languages: Orthography and the gene-brain behavior link (pp. 151–174). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (2011). On the role of phonology in reading acquisition: The self-teaching hypothesis. In S. Brady, D. Braze, & C. A. Fowler (Eds.), Explaining individual differences in reading: Theory and evidence (pp. 45–68). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J., Bishop, D. V. M., & Stothard, S. E. (2000). Is preschool language impairment a risk factor for dyslexia in adolescence? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 587–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowling, M., & Hulme, C. (2005). Learning to read with a language impairment. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 397–412). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2011). Evidence-based interventions for reading and language difficulties: Creating a virtuous circle. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02014.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2014). Closing a virtuous circle: Reciprocal influences between theory and practice in studies of reading intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7, 300–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.925307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., & Nagy, W. E. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, M., & Hudson, A. (1984). A comparison of the effects of direct instruction and remedial English classes on the spelling skills of secondary students. Educational Psychology, 4, 261–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144341840040401
   Google Scholar
• Stothard, S. E., Hulme, C., Clarke, P., Barmby, P., & Snowling, M. J. (2010). York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension. Secondary Test. Brentford, UK: GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgerson, C. J., Brooks, G., & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling (DfES Research Rep. 711). London: Department for Education and Skills, University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Venezky, R. (1999). The American way of spelling. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, S., & Neisser, U. (1974). Perceptual organization as a determinant of visual recognition memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 87, 675–681.
   Google Scholar
• Zahorik, J. A. (1996). Elementary and secondary teachers' reports of how they make learning interesting. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 551–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar