5,799
Views
106
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Role of Epistemic Emotions in Personal Epistemology and Self-Regulated Learning

, &

REFERENCES

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
  • Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2012). Epistemological beliefs and ill-structured problem-solving in solo and paired contexts. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 2–14.
  • Arango-Muñoz, S., & Michaelian, K. (2014). Epistemic feelings, epistemic emotions: Review and introduction to the focus section. Philosophical Inquiries, 2, 97–122.
  • Baker, R., D'Mello, S., Rodrigo, M., & Graesser, A. (2010). Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence and persistence of affect during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 223–241. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.12.003
  • Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2014). Reconsidering personal epistemology as metacognition: A multifaceted approach to the analysis of epistemic thinking. Educational Psychologist, 49, 13–35. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.863265
  • Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). A constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39, 31–42. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_4
  • Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Bendixen, L. D. (2002). A process model of epistemic belief change. In B. K. Hofer & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 191–208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 180–191.
  • Bernecker, S., & Dretske, F. I. (2007). Knowledge: Readings in contemporary epistemology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Bromme, R., Pieschl, S., & Stahl, E. (2010). Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: A functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 7–26. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5
  • Brun, G., & Kuenzle, D. (2008). A new role for emotions in epistemology? In G. Brun, U. Doğuoğlu, & D. Kuenzle (Eds.), Epistemology and emotions (pp. 1–32). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281. doi:10.3102/00346543065003245
  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
  • Chevrier, M., Muis, K. R., Trevors, G., Pekrun, R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2015, August). The three antecedents to epistemic emotions and their consequences during self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the conference of the European Association for Learning and Instruction, Limassol, Cyprus.
  • Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. L. A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46, 141–167. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
  • Chinn, C. A., & Rinehart, R. W. (2016). Epistemic cognition and philosophy: Developing a new framework for epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 460–478). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • de Sousa, R. (2008). Epistemic feelings. In G. Brun, U. Doğuoğlu, & D. Kuenzle (Eds.), Epistemology and emotions (pp. 185–204). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Di Leo, I., & Muis, K. R. (2015, August). Confusion and math problem solving in elementary school students. Paper presented at the conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Limassol, Cyprus
  • Di Leo, I., Muis, K. R., & Singh, C. (2017, February). Confusion, curiosity, frustration: Temporal dynamics of emotions during problem solving. Paper presented at the National Association of School Psychologists Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX.
  • D'Mello, S. (2013). A selective meta-analysis on the relative incidence of discrete affective states during learning with technology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 1082–1099.
  • D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2011). The half-life of cognitive-affective states during complex learning. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1299–1308. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.613668
  • D'Mello, S. K., & Graesser, A. C. (2012). Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 145–157. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001
  • D'Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153–170. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003
  • Dokic, J. (2012). Seeds of self-knowledge: Noetic feelings and metacognition. In M. J. Beran, J. L. Brandl, J. Perner, & J. Proust (Eds.), Foundations of metacognition (pp. 302–321). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Durkin, K. (2011). The self-explanation effect when learning mathematics: A meta-analysis. Science, 26, 147–179.
  • Ekman, P. (1999). Facial expressions. In T. Dalgleish & T. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 301–320). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Elby, A., Macrander, C., & Hammer, D. (2016). Epistemic cognition in science. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 113–127). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Elgin, C. Z. (1996). Considered judgment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Elgin, C. Z. (2008). Emotion and understanding. In G. Brun, U. Doğuoğlu, & D. Kuenzle (Eds.), Epistemology and emotions (pp. 33–50). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Ellis, H. C., & Ashbrook, P. W. (1988). Resource allocation model of the effects of depressed mood states on memory. In K. Fiedler & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition and social behaviour (pp. 25–43). Toronto, Canada: Hogrefe.
  • Ellis, H. C., Seibert, P. S., & Varner, L. J. (1995). Emotion and memory: Effect of mood states on immediate and unexpected delayed recall. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 349–362.
  • Ellsworth, P. C. (2003). Confusion, concentration, and other emotions of interest: Commentary on Rozin and Cohen. Emotion, 3, 81–85. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.81
  • Faulkner, P. (2010). Norms of trust. In A. Haddock, A. Millar, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Social epistemology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oSo/9780199577477.001.0001/acprof-9780199577477-chapter-7
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Foster, M. I., & Keane, M. T. (2015). Why some surprises are more surprising than others: Surprises as a metacognitive sense of explanatory difficulty. Cognitive Psychology, 81, 74–116. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.08.004
  • Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N. C., Nett, U. E., Pekrun, R., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2014). Types of boredom: An experience sampling approach. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 401–419. doi:10.1007/s11031-013-9385-y
  • Goodman, N., & Elgin, C. Z. (1988). Reconceptions in philosophy and other arts and sciences. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Graesser, A., Ozuru, Y., & Sullins, J. (2010). What is a good question? In M. McKeown, & G. Kucan (Eds.), Bringing reading research to life (pp. 112–141). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Greene, J. A., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43, 142–160. doi:10.1080/00461520802178458
  • Greene, J. A., Muis, K. R., & Pieschl, S. (2010). The role of epistemic beliefs in students' self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 45, 245–257. doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.515932
  • Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of epistemic cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gross, J. J. (2014). Emotion regulation: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Hammer, D. H., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39, 43–55. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5
  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140. doi:10.3102/00346543067001088
  • Hookaway, C. (2008). Epistemic immediacy, doubt and anxiety: On a role for affective states in epistemic evaluation. In G. Brun, U. Doğuoğlu, & D. Kuenzle (Eds.), Epistemology and emotions (pp. 51–65). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2015). Engaging in science: A feeling for the discipline. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 1–47.
  • Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Learning to feel like a scientist. Science Education, 100, 189–220. doi:10.1002/sce.21202
  • Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2012). Children's scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review, 32, 125–160. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2012.04.002
  • Johnston, M. (1989). Dispositional theories of value. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary, 63, 139–174.
  • Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20, 963–973. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.x
  • Kata, A. (2012). Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm: An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine, 30, 3778–3789. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112
  • King, P., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kortum, P., Edwards, C., & Richards-Kortum, R. (2008). The impact of inaccurate Internet health information in a secondary school learning environment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10, e17. doi:10.2196/jmir.986
  • Kruglanski, A. W. (2013). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “Freezing.” Psychological Review, 103, 263–283. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263
  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1999). The cognition-emotion debate: A bit of history. In T. Dalgleish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 3–19). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Lehman, B., D'Mello, S., & Person, N. (2010). The intricate dance between cognition and emotion during expert tutoring. In J. Kay, & V. Aleven (Eds.), Proceedings of 10th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 433–442). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
  • Lehman, B., D'Mello, S., Strain, A., Mills, C., Gross, M., Dobbins, A., … Graesser, A. (2013). Inducing and tracking confusion with contradictions during complex learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 22, 85–105.
  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37, 69–78. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_2
  • Litman, J. (2005). Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 793–814. doi:10.1080/02699930541000101
  • Litman, J. A., & Jimerson, T. L. (2004). The measurement of curiosity as a feeling of deprivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 147–157. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8202_3
  • Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
  • Lombardi, D., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Emotions about teaching about human-induced climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 167–191. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.738372
  • Maguire, R., Maguire, P., & Keane, M. T. (2011). Making sense of surprise: An investigation of the factors influencing surprise judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 176–186.
  • Meinhardt, J., & Pekrun, R. (2003). Attentional resource allocation to emotional events: An ERP study. Cognition & Emotion, 17, 477–500. doi:10.1080/02699930244000039
  • Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Zwarun, L. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education, 41, 271–290. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00049-6
  • Morton, A. (2010). Epistemic emotions. In P. Goldie (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of emotion (pp. 385–399). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42, 173–190. doi:10.1080/00461520701416306
  • Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3–54. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6
  • Muis, K. R., & Duffy, M. C. (2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students' beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 213–225. doi:10.1037/a0029690
  • Muis, K. R., & Franco, G. (2009). Epistemic beliefs: Setting the standards in self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 306–318.
  • Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., & Heddy, B. C. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 39, 168–183. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.003
  • Muis, K. R., Psaradellis, C., Lajoie, S. P., Di Leo, I., & Chevrier, M. (2015). The role of epistemic emotions in mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 172–185. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.003
  • Muis, K. R., & Singh, C. A. (2018). The three facets of epistemic thinking in self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & J. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulated of learning and performance (pp. 434–456). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Muis, K. R., Trevors, G., & Chevrier, M. (2016). Epistemic climate for epistemic change. In I. Bråten, J. Greene, & B. Sandoval (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 331–359). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Murphy, P. K., Alexander, P. A., & Muis, K. R. (2012). Knowledge and knowing: The journey from philosophy and psychology to human learning. In K. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook: Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 189–226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Op't Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). Students' emotions: A key component of self-regulated learning? In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 185–204). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology, 41, 359–376. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1992.tb00712.x
  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
  • Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135. doi:10.1037/a0013383
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students' learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary educational psychology, 36(1), 36–48. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
  • Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). International handbook of emotions in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 120–141). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2012). Academic emotions. In K. R. Harris (Ed.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 2: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 3–31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Pekrun, R., Vogl, E., Muis, K. R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2017). Measuring emotions during epistemic activities: The epistemically-related emotion scales. Cognition and Emotion, 31(6), 1268–1276. doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1204989
  • Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Peters, E. (2006). The functions of affect in the construction of preference. In S. Lichtenstein & P. Slovic (Eds.), The Construction of preference (pp. 454–463). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence. New York, NY: International University Press.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Future challenges and direction for theory and research on personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 389–414). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 269–286. doi:10.1080/00313830120074206
  • Reisenzein, R., & Studtmann, M. (2007). On the expression and experience of surprise: No evidence for facial feedback, but evidence for a reverse self-inference effect. Emotion, 7, 612–627. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.612
  • Rescher, N. (1976). Plausible reasoning: An introduction to the theory and practice of plausibilistic inference. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
  • Richter, T., & Schmid, S. (2010). Epistemological beliefs and epistemic strategies in self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 47–65. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9038-4
  • Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. (2005). The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 271–286). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96, 488–526. doi:10.1002/sce.21006
  • Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634–656. doi:10.1002/sce.20065
  • Sandoval, W. A., & Çam, A. (2011). Elementary children's judgments of the epistemic status of sources of justification. Science Education, 95, 383–408. doi:10.1002/sce.20426
  • Scheffler, I. (1977). In praise of the cognitive emotions. In I. Scheffler (Ed.), In praise of the cognitive emotions and other essays in the philosophy of education (pp. 3–7). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Scherer, K. R. (2000). Psychological models of emotion. The Neuropsychology of Emotion, 6, 137–162.
  • Schlick, M. (1934). On the foundation of knowledge. In H. L. Muller & B. van de Velde-Schlick (Eds.), Moritz Schlick: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2, pp. 370–387). Dordrech, The Netherlands: Reidel.
  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effect of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
  • Schraw, G. (2013). Conceptual integration and measurement of epistemological and ontological beliefs in educational research. ISRN Education, 1, 1–19.
  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
  • Silvia, P. J. (2010). Confusion and interest: The role of knowledge emotions in aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 75–80. doi:10.1037/a0017081
  • Sosa, E. (2010). The epistemology of disagreement. In A. Haddock, A. Millar, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Social epistemology (pp. 278–297). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Stein, N., & Levine, L. (1991). Making sense out of emotion. In W. Kessen, A. Ortony, & F. Kraik (Eds.), Memories, thoughts, and emotions: Essays in honor of George Mandler (pp. 295–322). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Thagard, P. (2008). How cognition meets emotion: Beliefs, desires, and feelings as neural activity. In G. Brun, U. Doğuoğlu, & D. Kuenzle (Eds.), Epistemology and emotions (pp. 167–184). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Thagard, P., & Aubie, B. (2008). Emotional consciousness: A neural model of how cognitive appraisal and somatic perception interact to produce qualitative experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 811–834. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.014
  • Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973–988. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973
  • Trevors, G. J., Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., & Winne, P. H. (2016). Identity and epistemic emotions during knowledge revision: A potential account for the backfire effect. Discourse Processes, 53, 339–370. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1136507
  • Tsuda, A., Muis, K. R., & Singh, C. (2017, August). The anti-vaccination debate: A cross-cultural exploration of emotions and epistemic thinking. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association annual convention, Washington, DC.
  • VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., & Baggett, W. B. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition and Instruction, 21, 209–249. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2103_01
  • Whittlesea, B. W., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 547–565.
  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., ter Vrugte, J., Vandercruysse, S., de Jong, T., & Elen, J. (2015). The role of curiosity-triggering events in game-based learning for mathematics. In J. Torbeyns, E. Lehtinen, & J. Elen (Eds.), Describing and studying domain-specific serious games (pp. 191–207). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Labuhn, A. S. (2012). Self-regulation of learning: Process approaches to personal development. In K. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook: Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 189–226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.