Semantic congruence in arithmetic: A new conceptual model for word problem solving

References

• Baranes, R., Perry, M., & Stigler, J. W. (1989). Activation of real-world knowledge in the solution of word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 6(4), 287–318. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0604_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassok, M. (2001). Semantic alignments in mathematical word problems. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 401–433). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bassok, M., Chase, V. M., & Martin, S. A. (1998). Adding apples and oranges: Alignment of semantic and formal knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 99–134. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassok, M., & Olseth, K. (1995). Object-based representations: Transfer between cases of continuous and discrete models of change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1522–1538. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassok, M., Pedigo, S. F., & Oskarsson, A. (2008). Priming addition facts with semantic relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 343–352. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassok, M., Wu, L. L., & Olseth, K. L. (1995). Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem-solving transfer. Memory & Cognition, 23(3), 354–367. doi:10.3758/BF03197236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A., Swan, M., & Taylor, G. (1981). Choice of operation in verbal problems with decimal numbers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(4), 399–420. doi:10.1007/BF00308139
   Google Scholar
• Blessing, S. B., & Ross, B. H. (1996). Content effects in problem categorization and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 792. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. W., & Goldstone, R. L. (2015). Effects of variation and prior knowledge on abstract concept learning. Cognition and Instruction, 33(3), 226–256. doi:10.1080/07370008.2015.1067215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canobi, K. H. (2005). Children’s profiles of addition and subtraction understanding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(3), 220–246. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canobi, K. H., Reeve, R. A., & Pattison, P. E. (2003). Patterns of knowledge in children’s addition. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 521–534. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., & Moser, J. M. (1982). The development of addition and subtraction problem-solving skills. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 9–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Casasanto, D., Boroditsky, L., Phillips, W., Greene, J., Goswami, S., Bocanegra-Thiel, I., … Gil, D. (2004). How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 575–580). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Charness, N., Tuffiash, M., Krampe, R., Reingold, E., & Vasyukova, E. (2005). The role of deliberate practice in chess expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 151–165. doi:10.1002/acp.1106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, E., & Richard, J.-F. (1997). Knowledge of domain effects in problem representation: The case of Tower of Hanoi isomorphs. Thinking & Reasoning, 3(2), 133–157. doi:10.1080/135467897394392
   Google Scholar
• Coquin-Viennot, D., & Moreau, S. (2003). Highlighting the role of the episodic situation model in the solving of arithmetical problems. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 3, 267–279. doi:10.1007/BF03173248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, R., & Renton, M. (1996). Do they know what they are doing? Children’s use of economical addition strategies and knowledge of commutativity. Educational Psychology, 16(4), 407–420. doi:10.1080/0144341960160405
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, D. D. (1991). Children’s interpretations of arithmetic word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 8(3), 261–289. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0803_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word problems. Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 405–438. (88)90011-4 doi:10.1016/0010-0285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). The psychology of problem solving. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Dorsey, J., Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1991). The role of rewording and context personalization in the solving of mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 61–68. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1987). The effect of semantic structure on first graders’ strategies for solving addition and subtraction word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(5), 363–381. doi:10.2307/749085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & De Win, L. (1985). Influence of rewording verbal problems on children’s problem representations and solution. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 460–470. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.77.4.460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving (L. S. Lees, Trans). Psychological Monographs, 58(5), i–113. (5, Whole No. 270). doi:10.1037/h0093599
   Google Scholar
• Edens, K., & Potter, E. (2008). How students “unpack” the structure of a word problem: Graphic representations and problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 108(5), 184–196. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17827.x
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, 79(Supplement), S70–S81. doi:10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 988–994. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00227.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https:// doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E. (1989). Tacit models and mathematical reasoning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 3–17. doi:10.2307/748969
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., Son, J. Y., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014). Concreteness fading in mathematics and science instruction: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 9–25. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9249-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamo, S., Sander, E., & Richard, J.-F. (2010). Transfer of strategy use by semantic recoding in arithmetic problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 400–410. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development, 59(1), 47–59. doi:10.2307/1130388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 1–38. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., & Brown, A. L. (1990). Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition, 35(1), 69–95. (90)90037-K doi:10.1016/0010-0277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeber, A. O., Tirosh, D., & Glover, R. (1989). Preservice teachers’ misconceptions in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 95–102. doi:10.2307/749100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of solutions. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 276–295). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Griggs, R. A., & Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thematic‐materials effect in Wason’s selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 73(3), 407–420. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01823.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros, H., Sander, E., & Thibaut, J. P. (2016). “This problem has no solution”: When closing one of two doors results in failure to access any. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. C. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1271–1276). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gros, H., Sander, E., & Thibaut, J. P. (2019). When masters of abstraction run into a concrete wall: Experts failing arithmetic word problems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1738–1746. doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01628-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros, H., Thibaut, J.-P., & Sander, E. (2017). The nature of quantities influences the representation of arithmetic problems: Evidence from drawings and solving procedures in children and adults. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. London, UK: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Große, C. S., & Renkl, A. (2006). Effects of multiple solution methods in mathematics learning. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 122–138. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthormsen, A. M., Fisher, K. J., Bassok, M., Osterhout, L., DeWolf, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (2016). Conceptual integration of arithmetic operations with real‐world knowledge: Evidence from event‐related potentials. Cognitive Science, 40(3), 723–757. doi:10.1111/cogs.12238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gvozdic, K., & Sander, E. (2017). Solving additive word problems: Intuitive strategies make the difference. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. London, UK: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Green, C. E. (1992). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: Evidence from students’ eye fixations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 76–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Monk, C. A. (1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 18–32. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, D. R., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, T. (1983). Correspondences and numerical differences between disjoint sets. Child Development, 54(1), 84–90. doi:10.2307/1129864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, C. G., & Lindvall, C. M. (1982). Factors associated with the ability of kindergarten children to solve simple arithmetic story problems. The Journal of Educational Research, 75(3), 149–156. doi:10.1080/00220671.1982.10885372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4(1), 71–115. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0401_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness (No. 6). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2010). Mental models and human reasoning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(43), 18243–18250. doi:10.1073/pnas.1012933107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, N. C., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (1992). Differential calculation abilities in young children from middle- and low-income families. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 644–653. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.4.644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92(1), 109–129. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.92.1.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K. R., Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Trade‐offs between grounded and abstract representations: Evidence from algebra problem solving. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32(2), 366–397. doi:10.1080/03640210701863933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 129–164. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1302_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotovsky, L., & Gentner, D. (1996). Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity. Child Development, 67(6), 2797–2822. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01889.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1985). Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17(2), 248–294. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90009-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouba, V. L. (1989). Children’s solution strategies for equivalent set multiplication and division word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(2), 147–158. doi:10.2307/749279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being (Nachdr.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, E., Hannula-Sormunen, M., McMullen, J., & Gruber, H. (2017). Cultivating mathematical skills: From drill-and-practice to deliberate practice. ZDM, 49(4), 625–636. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0856-6
   Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 161–168). Seoul, Korea: The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Mani, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions. Memory & Cognition, 10(2), 181–187. doi:10.3758/BF03209220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesher, P., Greeno, J. G., & Riley, M. S. (1982). The development of semantic categories for addition and subtraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 13(4), 373–394. doi:10.1007/BF00366618
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving (Vol. 104, No. 9). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 510. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette, G., Léonard, M., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Mihaila, S., & Gareau, D. (2006). Learning design based on graphical knowledge-modeling. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plato (2009). Plato’s Phaedrus. Millis, MA: Agora Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Prather, R. W., & Alibali, M. W. (2009). The development of arithmetic principle knowledge: How do we know what learners know? Developmental Review, 29(4), 221–248. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B. (1992). From protoquantities to operators: Building mathematical competence on a foundation of everyday knowledge. Analysis of Arithmetic for Mathematics Teaching, 19, 275–323.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B. (1994). Situated rationalism: Biological and social preparation for learning. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 474–493). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reusser, K. (1988). Problem solving beyond the logic of things: Contextual effects on understanding and solving word problems. Instructional Science, 17(4), 309–338. doi:10.1007/BF00056219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reusser, K. (1989). Textual and situational factors in solving mathematical word problems (Research Rep. No. 7). Bern, Switzerland: University of Bern, Department of Educational Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Reusser, K. (1990). From text to situation to equation: Cognitive simulation of understanding and solving mathematical word problems. In H. Mandl, E. De Corte, N. Bennet, & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), Learning and instruction, European research in an international context, (Vol. II). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reusser, K. (1993). Tutoring systems and pedagogical theory: Representational tools for understanding, planning, and reflection in problem solving. Computers as Cognitive Tools, 1, 143–177.
   Google Scholar
• Richland, L. E., Stigler, J. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Teaching the conceptual structure of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 189–203. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.667065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, M. S., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children’s problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153–196). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 629. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, B. H., & Bradshaw, G. L. (1994). Encoding effects of remindings. Memory & Cognition, 22(5), 591–605. doi:10.3758/bf03198398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, E., & Richard, J.-F. (2005). Analogy and transfer: Encoding the problem at the right level of abstraction. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy, pp. 1925–1930.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C. (1975). The role of memory in language processing. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.), The structure of human memory (pp. 162–189). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Oxford, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H., & Herrmann, D. J. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(5), 484. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.8.5.484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2012). Adaptive educational systems. In P. Durlach (Ed.), Adaptive technologies for training and education (pp. 7–27). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, E. A. (1981). Recall of mathematical problem information: Solving related problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 54–64. doi:10.3758/10.2307/748658
   Google Scholar
• Squire, S., & Bryant, P. (2002). From sharing to dividing: Young children’s understanding of division. Developmental Science, 5(4), 452–466. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Staub, F. C., & Reusser, K. (1992). The role of presentational factors in understanding and solving mathematical word problems. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Staub, F. C., & Reusser, K. (1995). The role of presentational structures in understanding and solving mathematical word problems. In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension (pp. 285–305). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, E., & Lehrndorfer, A. (1992). The role of situational context in solving word problems. Cognitive Development, 7(2), 259–268. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(92)90014-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchounikine, P. (2011). Educational software engineering. In Computer science and educational software design (pp. 111–122). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thevenot, C. (2010). Arithmetic word problem solving: Evidence for the construction of a mental model. Acta Psychologica, 133(1), 90–95. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevenot, C. (2017). Arithmetic word problem solving: The role of prior knowledge. In D. C. Geary, D. B. Berch, R. J. Ochsendorf, & K. M. Koepke (Eds.), Acquisition of complex arithmetic skills and higher-order mathematics concepts (pp. 47–66). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Thevenot, C., & Barrouillet, P. (2015). Arithmetic word problem solving and mental representations. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 158–179). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thevenot, C., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The strategic use of alternative representations in arithmetic word problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(7), 1311–1323. doi:10.1080/02724980443000593
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thevenot, C., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Representations and strategies for solving dynamic and static arithmetic word problems: The role of working memory capacities. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18(5), 756–775. doi:10.1080/09541440500412270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. O. (1991). The effect of problem type and common misconceptions on preservice elementary teachers’ thinking about division. School Science and Mathematics, 91(4), 157–163. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1991.tb12070.x
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 127–174). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, L. (1994). Using retelling data to study elementary school children’s representations and solutions of compare problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 141–165. doi:10.2307/749506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (1997). Teaching realistic mathematical modeling in the elementary school: A teaching experiment with fifth graders. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 577–601. doi:10.2307/749692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, S., Orrantia, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). Influence of situational and conceptual rewording on word problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 829–848. doi:10.1348/000709907X178200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P., Hodges, N. J., Starkes, J. L., & Williams, M. A. (2007). The road to excellence: Deliberate practice and the development of expertise. High Ability Studies, 18(2), 119–153. doi:10.1080/13598130701709715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar