Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices

References

• Alwaleedi, M. (2022). Students’ emotional and behavioral engagement: Cloud-based Collaborative writing and learning analytics. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 374–400.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., & Patrick, H. (2012). Achievement goal theory, conceptualization of ability/intelligence, and classroom climate. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 173–191). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_8
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. (2008). Toward a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 33–60). Athabasca University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2019). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conference environment. Online Learning, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
   Google Scholar
• Archambault, L., Kennedy, K., Shelton, C., Dalal, M., McAllister, L., & Huyett, S. (2016). Incremental progress: Re-examining field experiences in K–12 online learning contexts in the United States. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(3), 303–326.
   Google Scholar
• Archambault, L., Leary, H., & Rice, K. (2022/this issue). Pillars of online pedagogy: A framework for teaching in online learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2051513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arizona State University Online. (2017). ASU online launches success center. https://asuonline.asu.edu/newsroom/online-learning-tips/asu-online-launches-success-center/
   Google Scholar
• Atwater, C., Borup, J., Baker, R., & West, R. E. (2017). Student perceptions of video communication in an online sport and recreation studies graduate course. Sport Management Education Journal, 11(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2016-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker, C. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. Journal of Educators Online, 7(1). https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2010_7_1/baker
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Eliyahu, A., Moore, D., Dorph, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, G. E., & Okagaki, L. (2012). Ethnicity and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bolliger, D., & Martin, F. (2021). Factors underlying the perceived importance of online student engagement strategies. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(2), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2020-0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, J. (2016a). Teacher perceptions of learner-learner engagement at a cyber high school. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, J. (2016b). Teacher perceptions of parent engagement at a cyber high school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1146560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, J., Chambers, C., & Stimson, R. (2019). K–12 student perceptions of online teacher and on-site facilitator support in supplemental online courses. Online Learning, 23(4), 253–280. https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/1565/874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, J., & Evmenova, A. (2019). The effectiveness of professional development in overcoming obstacles to effective online instruction in a college of education. Online Learning, 23(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Drysdale, J. S. (2014). The nature of teacher engagement at an online high school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 793–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, J., Graham, C. R., West, R. E., Archambault, L., & Spring, K. J. (2020). Academic communities of engagement: An expansive lens for examining support structures in blended and online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 807–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09744-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, J., Jensen, M., Archambault, L., Short, C. R., & Graham, C. R. (2020). Supporting students during COVID-19: Developing and leveraging academic communities of engagement in a time of crisis. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 161–169. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216288/
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., Stevens, M. A., & Hasler Waters, L. (2015). Parent and student perceptions of parent engagement at a cyber charter high school. Online Learning, 19(5), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, J., & Stimson, R. J. (2019). Responsibilities of online teachers and on-site facilitators in online high school courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1554984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, J., Walters, S., & Call-Cummings, M. (2019). Examining the complexities of parental engagement at an online charter high school: A narrative analysis approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 95–110. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, J., West, R. E., Thomas, R. A., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Examining the impact of video feedback on instructor social presence in blended courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 232–256.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (W. Damon, series Ed., 5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 993–1028). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Capdeferro, N., & Romero, M. (2012). Are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Preface. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, L. (2019). Applying gamifications to asynchronous online discussions: A mixed methods study. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draus, P. J., Curran, M. J., & Trempus, M. S. (2014). The influence of instructor-generated video content on student satisfaction with and engagement in asynchronous online classes. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 240–254.
   Google Scholar
• Drysdale, J., Graham, C. R., & Borup, J. (2016). Teacher and student perspectives on facilitating a sense of community through an online high school’s “shepherding” program. International Journal of e-Learning, 15, 149–177.
   Google Scholar
• Faller, M. (2018). ASU helps more students return after freshman year and thrive during college. ASU Now. https://asunow.asu.edu/20180828-asu-news-freshman-retention-higher-national-average-thrive
   Google Scholar
• Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–132). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A multidimensional view of engagement. Theory into Practice, 50(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.607401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidhoff, J. R. (2021). Michigan’s k–12 virtual learning effectiveness report 2019-20. Michigan Virtual University. https://michiganvirtual.org/research/publications/michigans-k–12-virtual-learning-effectiveness-report-2019-20/
   Google Scholar
• Freidhoff, J. R., Borup, J., Stimson, R., & DeBruler, K. (2015). Documenting and sharing the work of successful on-site mentors. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 107–128. http://www.learntechlib.org/p/149918/
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning: Social, teaching and cognitive presence. In C. Howard (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance and online learning (2nd ed., pp. 352–355). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2019). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Online Learning, 11(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i1.1737
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2014). A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: The impact of motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for blended learning research. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives (volume 2, issue 801, pp. 13–33). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., Graham, C. R., & Koehler, M. J. (2022/this issue). Foundations of online learning: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2090364
   Google Scholar
• Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In M. Sehami, A. Fox, M. A. Hearst, & M. T. H. Chi (Eds.), Proceedings of the first ACM conference on learning @ scale conference (pp. 41–50). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239
   Google Scholar
• Guo, W., Chen, Y., Lei, J., & Wen, Y. (2014). The effects of facilitating feedback on online learners’ cognitive engagement: Evidence from the asynchronous online discussion. Education Sciences, 4(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4020193
   Google Scholar
• Hachey, A. C., Wladis, C. W., & Conway, K. M. (2012). Is the second time the charm? Investigating trends in online re-enrollment, retention and success. Journal of Educators Online, 9(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2012.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasler-Waters, L., Borup, J., & Menchaca, D. M. P. (2018). Parental involvement in K–12 online and blended learning. In K. Kennedy and R. Ferdig (Eds.), Handbook of research on K–12 online and blended learning. (2nd ed., pp. 403–422). ETC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526853
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmons, R., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 176–198.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, H. Y., Tseng, H. W., & Akarasriworn, C. (2013). Collaboration factors, teamwork satisfaction, and student attitudes toward online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners' engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2), 196–216. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leony, D., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Pardo, A., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Provision of awareness of learners’ emotions through visualizations in a computer interaction-based environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(13), 5093–5100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.03.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Calvo, R. A., Pardo, A., & Martin, A. (2015). Measuring and visualizing students’ behavioral engagement in writing activities. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2014.2378786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowes, S., & Lin, P. (2015). Learning to learn online: Using locus of control to help students become successful online learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 17–48.
   Google Scholar
• Mabuan, R. A. (2020). MOOCs and MOOC camps for online teacher professional development: Experiences and perspectives from the Philippines. In H.-S. Kang, D.-s. Shin, & T. Cimasko (Eds.), Online Education for teachers of English as a global language (pp. 80–104). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mahatmya, D., Lohman, B. J., Matjasko, J. L., & Farb, A. F. (2012). Engagement across developmental periods. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–132). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Budhrani, K. (2017). Two decades (1995 to 2014) of systematic review of research on synchronous online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1264807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Parker, M. A., & Deale, D. F. (2012). Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 228–261. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Polly, D., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2020). Bichronous online learning: blending asynchronous and synchronous online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/9/bichronous-online-learning-blending-asynchronous-and-synchronous-online-learning
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A Systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Xie, K., & Bolliger, D. (2022). Engaging learners in the emergency transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S1–S13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1%3C6::AID-JCOP2290140103%3E3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. N., Sellnow, D. D., & Strawser, M. G. (2021). Pandemic pedagogy challenges and opportunities: instruction communication in remote, HyFlex, and BlendFlex courses. Communication Education, 70(2), 202–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1857418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–29). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., & Harland, J. (2012). Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses. Distance Education, 33(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.667957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2021). Condition of education 2021. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2021144
   Google Scholar
• Oliphant, T., & Branch-Mueller, J. (2016). Developing a sense of community and the online student experience. Education for Information, 32(4), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-160979
   Google Scholar
• Olson, P. G. (2014). An investigation into student engagement with an online collaboration platform (Edmodo) in a high school environmental science course [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Delaware.
   Google Scholar
• Oviatt, D. R., Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Davies, R. S. (2018). Online student use of a proximate community of engagement in an independent study program. Online Learning, 22(1), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 97–132). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Politis, D., & Politis, J. D. (2016). The relationship between an online synchronous learning environment and knowledge acquisition skills and traits: The blackboard collaborate experience. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(3), 196–222.
   Google Scholar
• Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Virtually successful: Defeating the dropout problem through online programs. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170608800107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roblyer, M. D., Freeman, J., Stabler, M., & Schneidmiler, J. (2007). External evaluation of the Alabama ACCESS initiative phase 3 report. International Society for Technology in Education. http://accessdl.state.al.us/2006Evaluation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roksa, J., & Kinsley, P. (2019). The role of family support in facilitating academic success of low-income students. Research in Higher Education, 60(4), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9517-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building a sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S. M., & Terras, K. L. (2015). Advising experiences and needs of online, cohort, and classroom adult graduate learners. NACADA Journal, 35(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.12930/nacada-13-044
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learning. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–132). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2022/this issue). Building bridges to advance the community of inquiry framework for online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2022/this issue) Equity in online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199.
   Google Scholar
• Velasquez, A., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2013). An investigation of practices and tools that enabled technology-mediated caring in an online high school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5), 277–299. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1465/2758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, Ed.). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526852
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, M., & Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. Ardent Media.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A., Chang, J., Duffy, T., & Del Valle, R. (2004). The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.2190/v0lb-1m37-rnr8-y2u1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A., & Taylor, D. J. (2012). A self-regulated learning perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 97–132). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, P. H., & Wu, H. K. (2020). Constructing a model of engagement in scientific inquiry: investigating relationships between inquiry-related curiosity, dimensions of engagement, and inquiry abilities. Instructional Science, 48(1), 79–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09503-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, K., & Ke, F. (2011). The role of students' motivation in peer‐moderated asynchronous online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 916–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Lin, L., Zhan, Y., & Ren, Y. (2016). The impact of teaching presence on online engagement behaviors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(7), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116648171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zotti, R. (2017). The Implementation of web conferencing technologies in online graduate classes. ProQuest LLC.
   Google Scholar