Building bridges to advance the Community of Inquiry framework for online learning

References

• Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3), 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. (2021). Introduction to the community of inquiry model and interactions. Social presence and interaction in e-learning. EDEN NAP Webinar. https://www.eden-online.org/eden_conference/social-presence-and-interaction-in-e-learning/
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(5), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2013). Does academic discipline moderate CoI-course outcomes relationships in online MBA courses? The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyle, M., & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006). Future foreign language teachers’ social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 42–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, W., Diaz, S. R., Gibson, A. M., Ice, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2009). An exploration of the relationship between indicators of the community of inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Breivik, J. (2016). Critical thinking in online educational discussions measured as progress through inquiry phases: A discussion of the cognitive presence construct in the community of inquiry framework. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 32(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Breivik, J. (2020). Searching for a framework to analyze critical thinking and rational argumentation in online educational discussions [Doctoral dissertation]. https://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/19214/thesis.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B., & Eaton, S. E. (2020). Using a Community of Inquiry lens to examine synchronous online discussions in graduate courses. In L. Wilton, & C. Brett (Eds.), Handbook of research on online discussion-based teaching methods (pp. 229–262). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3292-8.ch010
   Google Scholar
• Caskurlu, S., Maeda, Y., Richardson, J. C., & Lv, J. (2020). A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students’ satisfaction and learning. Computers and Education, 157, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caskurlu, S., Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., & Kozan, K. (2021). The qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning as informed by the community of inquiry framework: A thematic synthesis. Computers & Education, 165, 104111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celentin, P. (2007). Online training: Analysis of interaction and knowledge building patterns among foreign language teachers. Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, M., & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics (Technical Report No. 403). Centre for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. G. (June, (2004). Building trust in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2004.828203
   Google Scholar
• Darabi, A., Liang, X., Suryavanshi, R., & Yurekli, H. (2013). Effectiveness of online discussion strategies: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.837651
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (2015). Introduction. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 1–29). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think (rev. ed.). D.C. Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1959). My pedagogic creed. In J. Dewey (Ed.), Dewey on education. (pp. 19–32). Teachers College, Columbia University. (Original work published 1897)
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Sadaf, A., & Ertmer, D. (2011). Student-content interactions in online courses: The role of question prompts in facilitating higher level engagement with course content. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 57–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9047-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, R. (2020, June 5). Online lectures are here to stay. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/05/business/online-learning-winner-coronavirus.html
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (1991). Critical thinking and adult education: A conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 10(4), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137910100403
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-regulation and metacognition. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds). Elements of quality online education: Practice and direction (pp. 46–58). The Sloan Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2009). Blended learning as a transformative design approach. In P. Rogers, G. Berg, J. Boettcher, C. Howard, L. Justice, & K. Schenk (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance learning (2nd ed., pp. 200–204). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-198-8.ch028
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2022). Shared metacognition in a community of inquiry. Online Learning, 26(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferencing. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2–3), 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E., Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., & Gallego-Arrufat, M. J. (2015). Cognitive presence through social and teaching presence in communities of inquiry: A correlational-predictive study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2017). Self-regulation, co-regulation and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 83–106). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S., Uzuner-Smith, S., & Shea, P. (2015). Expanding learning presence to account for the direction of regulative intent: Self-, co- and shared regulation in online learning. Online Learning, 19(3), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.666
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
   Google Scholar
• Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students’ sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3–25. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/104047/
   Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., Hadwin, A. F., Malmberg, J., & Miller, M. (2018). Contemporary perspectives of regulated learning in collaboration. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, P. Reimann, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 127–136). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., Sobocinski, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2021). Metacognition in collaborative learning. In U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. F. Wise, & J. Oshima (Eds)., International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 281–294). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_15
   Google Scholar
• Joksimovic, S., Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Adesope, O., & Hatala, M. (2014). Psychological characteristics in cognitive presence of communities of inquiry: A linguistic analysis of online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, M., Choi, H., & Park, S. (2007). Construction and validation of a social presence scale for measuring online learners' involvement. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), EdMedia + Innovate Learning. (pp. 1829–1833). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanuka, H., & Garrison, D. R. (2004). Cognitive presence in online learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(2), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940928
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, D. H., & Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37(3), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2011). Developing an instrument to measure social presence in distance higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 763–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozan, K. (2016). A comparative structural equation modeling investigation of the relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence. Online Learning, 20(3), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i3.654
   Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P., & Vermeulen, P. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.750225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Xu, K., & Weidlich, J. (2021). Social presence: Conceptualization and measurement. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09623-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners’ engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2), 196–216. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y., Walker, A., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20(2014), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, P. (2011). Role of social presence and cognitive absorption in online learning environments. Distance Education, 32(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.565495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J., & Richardson, J. C. (2021). Predictive effects of undergraduate students’ perceptions of social, cognitive, and teaching presence on affective learning outcomes according to disciplines. Computers & Education, 161, 104063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S., Hung, T. C., & Lee, C. T. (2015). Revalidate forms of presence in training effectiveness: Mediating effect of self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(1), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115588772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. S. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). The evolution and influence of social presence theory on online learning. In T. T. Kidd (Ed.), Online education and adult learning: New frontiers for teaching practices (pp. 124–139). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R., & Snelson, C. (2017). In search of a better understanding of social presence: An investigation into how researchers define social presence. Distance Education, 38(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1324727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luebeck, J. L., & Bice, L. R. (2005). Online discussion as a mechanism of conceptual change among mathematics and science teachers. Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2007). When to jump in: The role of the instructor in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 49(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2021). Teaching and learning in the time of COVID: The student perspective. Online Learning, 25(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. (1966). Immediacy: An indicator of attitudes in linguistic communication. Journal of Personality, 34(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1966.tb01696.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication or emotions and attitudes (2nd ed.). Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. A. (2004). Evaluating online discussions: Four different frames of analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, M., & Kirschner, P. (2014). The social and interactive dimensions of collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 454–475). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E. (2004). Identifying and measuring ill-structured problem formulation and resolution in online asynchronous discussions. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 30(1), 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, M., & Sawyer, R. K. (2014). Foundations of the learning sciences. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 41–63). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1955). The philosophical writings of Peirce (J. Buchler, Ed.). Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 1–51. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v6n1/v6n1_picciano.asp
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G. (2013). An evaluation of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation’s anytime, anyplace learning program (1992–2012). Graduate Center, City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Pool, J., Reitsma, G., & van den Berg, D. (2017). Revised community of inquiry framework: Examining learning presence in a blended mode of delivery. Online Learning, 21(3), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., Sadaf, A., & Ertmer, P. (2013). Relationship between types of question prompts and critical thinking in online discussions. In Z. Akyol & D.R. Garrison (Eds.), Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice (pp. 197–222). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7.ch011
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.
   Google Scholar
• Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., Wendt, J., Wighting, M., & Nisbet, D. (2016). The predictive relationship among the community of inquiry framework, perceived learning and online, and graduate students’ course grades in online synchronous and asynchronous courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 18–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh, S. Z. (2015). Structural relationships of adult e-learners’ teaching presence, self-efficacy toward e-learning, and learning satisfaction: Focused on the mediating effect of learning presence and learning flow. International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information, 18(6(B)), 2759.
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue Internationale du e-Learning et la Formation à Distance, 23(1), 19–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sadaf, A., & Olesova, L. (2017). Enhancing cognitive presence in online case discussions with questions based on the practical inquiry model. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1267525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadaf, A., & Olesova, L. (2020). Exploring the relationship between interaction and the structure of questions in online discussions using learning analytics. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 23(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2020-0004
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, K., & Lokey-Vega, A. (2020). K-12 community of inquiry: A case study of the applicability of the community of inquiry framework in the K-12 learning environment. Journal of Online Learning Research, 6(1), 35–56. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/210589/
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2012). Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Computers & Education, 59(2), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner-Smith, S., Vickers, J., Bidjerano, T., Gozza-Cohen, M., Jian, S., Pickett, A., Wilde, J., & Tseng, C. (2013). Online learner self regulation: Learning presence, viewed through quantitative content- and social network analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 427–461. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner Smith, S., Vickers, J., Bidjerano, T., Pickett, A., Gozza-Cohen, M., Wilde, J., & Jian, S. (2012). Learning presence: Additional research on a new conceptual element within the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner-Smith, S., Vickers, J., Bidjerano, T., Pickett, A., Gozza-Cohen, M., Wilde, J., & Jian, S. (2012). Learning presence: Additional research on a new conceptual element within the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner-Smith, S., Vickers, J., Bidjerano, T., Gozza-Cohen, M., Jian, S., Pickett, A., Wilde, J., Tseng, C. (2013). Online learner self regulation: Learning presence, viewed through quantitative content- and social network analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 427–461. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Hayes, S., & Vickers, J. (2010). Online instructional effort measured through the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: A re-examination of measures and approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Hayes, S., Vickers, J., Gozza-Cohen, M., Uzuner, S., Mehta, R., Valchova, A., & Rangan, P. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and quantitative content analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Li, C. S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of “teaching presence” and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Li, C. S., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4), 59–82.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P. J., Pickett, A. M., & Pelz, W. E. (2003). A follow-up investigation of “teaching presence” in the SUNY Learning Network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2), 61–80.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Smith Jaggars, S. (2021). Introduction to the special issue on the COVID-19 emergency transition to remote learning. Online Learning, 25(1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenbom, S., Hrastinski, S., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2016). Emotional presence in a relationship of inquiry: The case of one-to-one online math coaching. Online Learning, 20(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i1.563
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K. (2003). Developing social presence in online discussions. In S. Naidu (Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 1470164). Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. In C. R. Payne (Ed.), Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43–57). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch004
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., & Shih, L.-F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2022/this issue). Equity in online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, N. D., Reali, A., Stenbom, S., Jansen Van Vuuren, M., & MacDonald, D. (2017). Blended learning from design to evaluation: International case studies of evidence-based practice. Online Learning, 21(3), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villasenor, J. (2020). Online college classes are here to stay. What does that mean for higher education? Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2020/06/01/online-college-classes-are-here-to-stay-what-does-that-mean-for-higher-education/
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society (14th ed.). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated communication: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), e3–e43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, R. E. (2022). Learning presence within the Community of Inquiry framework: An alternative measurement survey for a four-factor model. The Internet and Higher Education, 52, Article 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, M., & Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A., Chang, J., Duffy, T., & del Valle, R. (2004). The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.2190/V0LB-1M37-RNR8-Y2U1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wladis, C., Conway, K. M., & Hachey, A. C. (2016). Assessing readiness for online education – Research models for identifying students at risk. Online Learning, 20(3), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i3.980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar