Toward a paradigm shift in feedback research: Five further steps influenced by self-regulated learning theory

References

• Allal, L. (2020). Assessment and the co-regulation of learning in the classroom. Assessment in Education, 27(4), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1609411
   Google Scholar
• Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J. W., & Ufer, S. (2018). The impact of peer solution quality on peer-feedback provision on geometry proofs: Evidence from eye-movement analysis. Learning and Instruction, 58, 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment in Education, 27(4), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbel, Y., Feeley, E., & He, X. (2020). The effect of feedback on attention allocation in category learning: An eye tracking study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(3114), 559334. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., Taub, M., & Mudrick, N. V. (2018). Understanding and reasoning about real-time cognitive, affective, and metacognitive processes to foster self-regulation with advanced learning technologies. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 254–270). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, M., Strijbos, J. W., & Fischer, F. (2018). Effects of written peer-feedback content and sender’s competence on perceptions, performance, and mindful cognitive processing. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0343-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 199–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2018). Methods in feedback research. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Zhao. (2023). In defence of psychometric measurement: a systematic review of contemporary self-report feedback inventories. Educational Psychologist, 58(3), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2208670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cutumisu, M., Turgeon, K. L., Saiyera, T., Chuong, S., González Esparza, L. M., MacDonald, R., & Kokhan, V. (2019). Eye tracking the feedback assigned to undergraduate students in a digital assessment game. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1931. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Educational Endowment Foundation. (2018). Teaching & Learning Toolkit. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Toolkit/complete/EEF-Teaching-Learning-Toolkit-October-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eteläpeltoa, A., Kykyria, V. L., Penttonena, M., Hökkäa, P., Paloniemia, S., Vähäsantanena, K., Eteläpeltob, T., & Lappalainenb, V. (2018). A multi-componential methodology for exploring emotions in learning: Using self-reports, behaviour registration, and physiological indicators as complementary data. Frontline Learning Research, 6(3), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v6i3.379
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fong, C. J., & Schallert, D. L. (2023). “Feedback to the future”: Advancing motivational and emotional perspectives in feedback research. Educational Psychologist, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2134135
   Google Scholar
• Fong, C. J., Schallert, D. L., Williams, K. M., Williamson, Z. H., Lin, S., Kim, Y. W., & Chen, L. H. (2021). Making feedback constructive: The interplay of undergraduates’ motivation with perceptions of feedback specificity and friendliness. Educational Psychology, 41(10), 1241–1259. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1951671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer, L. K., & Dinsmore, D. L. (2020). The promise and Pitfalls of self-report. Frontline Learning Research, 8(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i3.623
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., Borriello, G. A., & Merrick, M. (2022). A developmental perspective on feedback: How corrective feedback influences children’s literacy, mathematics, and problem solving. Educational Psychologist, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2108426
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A. (2020). Building upon synergies among self-regulated learning and formative assessment research and practice. Assessment in Education, 27(4), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1802225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A. (2022). What can educational psychology learn from, and contribute to, theory development scholarship? Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 3011–3035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09682-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, S. E. A., Winstone, N. E., Ridout, N., & Nash, R. A. (2020). Weak memory for future-oriented feedback: Investigating the roles of attention and improvement focus. Memory, 28(2), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1709507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harber, K. D. (2004). The positive feedback bias as a response to outgroup unfriendliness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(11), 2272–2297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01977.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harber, K. D. (2023). The model of threat-infused intergroup feedback: Why, when, and how feedback to ethnic minority learners is positively biased. Educational Psychologist, 2023, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2170377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harber, K. D., Reeves, S., Gorman, J. L., Williams, C. H., Malin, J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2019). The conflicted language of interracial feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1220–1242. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harber, K. D., Stafford, R., & Kennedy, K. A. (2010). The positive feedback bias as a response to self-image threat. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(Pt 1), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X473956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2010). Mixing interview and questionnaire methods: Practical problems in aligning data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(1). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15&n=1
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karoly, P., Boekaerts, M., & Maes, S. (2005). Toward consensus in the psychology of self-regulation: How far have we come? How far do we have yet to travel? Applied Psychology-an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 54(2), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00211.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021). A review of feedback models and theories: Descriptions, definitions, and conclusions. Frontiers in Education, 6(481), 720195. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.720195
   Google Scholar
• Lui, A. M., & Andrade, H. L. (2022). The Next Black Box of formative assessment: A model of the internal mechanisms of feedback processing [Hypothesis and Theory]. Frontiers in Education, 7, 51548. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751548.
   Google Scholar
• Máñez, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., Kendeou, P., & Martínez, T. (2019). How do students process complex formative feedback in question-answering tasks? A think-aloud study. Metacognition and Learning, 14(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09192-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Melis, E. (2014). Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers & Education, 71, 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugteren, M. L., Jarodzka, H., Kester, L., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2018). Self-regulation of secondary school students: Self-assessments are inaccurate and insufficiently used for learning-task selection. Instructional Science, 46(3), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9448-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., García-Pérez, D., Fernández-Ruiz, J., Fraile, J., Sánchez-Iglesias, I., & Brown, G. T. L. (2022). University students’ strategies and criteria during self-assessment: Instructor’s feedback, rubrics, and year level effects. European Journal of Psychology of Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00639-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Klug, J., & Järvelä, S. (2016). Third wave of measurement in the self-regulated learning field: When measurement and intervention come hand in hand. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(6), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022). A review of feedback typologies and models: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35, 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Junge, M., Studtmann, M., & Huber, O. (2014). Observational approaches to the measurement of emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 580–606). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, B., Klug, J., & Schmidt, M. (2011). Assessing self-regulated learning using diary measures with university students. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. (pp. 251–266). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Greene, J. A. (2018). Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L. (2006). Multiple methodology in education research. Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research, 457–475.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderhasselt, M. A., De Raedt, R., Nasso, S., Puttevils, L., & Mueller, S. C. (2018). Don’t judge me: Psychophysiological evidence of gender differences to social evaluative feedback. Biological Psychology, 135, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.02.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderhasselt, M. A., Remue, J., Ng, K. K., Mueller, S. C., & De Raedt, R. (2015). The regulation of positive and negative social feedback: A psychophysiological study. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(3), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0345-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. (2011). Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9080-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2018). Feedback: At the heart of -but definitely not all of- formative assessment. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (pp. 3–28). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., & Nash, R. A. (2023). Toward a cohesive psychological science of effective feedback. Educational Psychologist, 58(3), 111–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247–1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar