Factors Associated With Students Graduating With STEM Degrees at a Military Academy: Improving Success by Identifying Early Obstacles

References

• Ackerman, P L., Kanfer, R., & Beier, M. E. (2013). Trait complex, cognitive ability, and domain knowledge predictors of baccalaureate success, STEM persistence, and gender differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 911–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACT Inc. (2018). The condition of college and career readiness. ACT Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. D., & Mayo, M. (2010). Refueling the U.S. innovation economy: Fresh approaches to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Aulck, L., Aras, R., Li, L., L’Heureux, C., Lu, P., & West, J. (2017). Stemming the tide: Predicting STEM attrition using student transcript data. https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.09344.
   Google Scholar
• Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender & Education, 17(4), 369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. M., Hirschy, A. S., & McClendon, S. A. (2004). Toward understanding and reducing college student departure. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 30(3).
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, H. E., Gonzalez-Espada, W. J., & Boram, R. D. (2019, April). Why do students leave quantitative STEM majors? Perspectives from Eastern Kentucky. Oral presentation at the Annual National Conference on Undergraduate Research, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields. National Center for Educational Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2015). STEM attrition among high-performing college students in the United States: Scope and potential causes. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 5(1), 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Wako, T. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education. National Center for Educational Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Christe, B. (2013). The importance of faculty-student connections in STEM disciplines: A literature review. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(3), 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Daugherty, T. K., & Lane, E. J. (1999). A longitudinal study of academic and social predictors of college attrition. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 27(4), 355–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Fakcharoenphol, W., Morphew, J. W., & Mestre, J. P (2015). Judgments of physics problem difficulty among experts and novices. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research 11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020128
   Google Scholar
• Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). STEM occupations: Past, present and future. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Gayles, J. G., & Ampaw, F. (2014). The impact of college experiences on degree completion in STEM fields at four-year institutions: Does gender matter? The Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 439–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayles, J. G., & Ampaw, F. (2016). To stay or leave: Factors that impact undergraduate women’s persistence in science majors. NASPA Journal about Women in Higher Education, 9(2), 133–151.
   Google Scholar
• González-Espada, W. J., & Napoleoni-Milán, R. L. (2006). The impact of the freshman year experience on science students. In J. J. Mintzes and W. H. Leonard (eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 351–358.). National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A., & Sanderson, D. (2017). The roots of STEM achievement: An analysis of persistence and attainment in STEM majors. The American Economist, 63(1), 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, A. L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 911–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., Corbett, C., & Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hrabowski, F. A., & Maton, K. I. (1995). Enhancing the success of African students in the sciences: Freshman year outcomes. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• King, B. (2015). Changing college majors: Does it happen more in STEM and do grades matter? Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(3), 44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Laskey, M. L. & Hetzel, C. J. (2011). Investigating factors related to retention of at-risk college students. The Learning Assistance Review, 16, 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Laws, P. W. (1997). Millikan lecture 1996: Promoting active learning based on physics education research in introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 65, 14–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg, M. J., Legg, J. C., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2011). Analysis of success in general chemistry based on diagnostic testing using logistic regression. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 1117–1121.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, A. J. & Singh, C. (2016). Surveying college introductory physics students’ attitudes and approaches to problem solving. European Journal of Physics, 37, 055704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70, 1259–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis, J. (2010). Better intro courses seen as key to reducing attrition of STEM majors. Science, 330(6002), 306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2010). Examination of the U.S. Air Force’s science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce needs in the future and its strategy to meet those needs. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board (NSB). (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018: National Center for Education Statistics 2011-12 beginning postsecondary students longitudinal study first follow-up. NSB-2018-1. National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nunez-Pena, M. I., Suarez-Pellicioni, M., & Bono, R. (2013). Effects of math anxiety on student success in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 36–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. W (2015). Best practices in logistic regression. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, A. B. (2004). Decreasing math anxiety in college students. College Student Journal, 38, 321–324.
   Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. PCAST.
   Google Scholar
• Rendon, L. I., Jalomo, R. E., & Nora, A. (2000). Theoretical considerations in the study of minority student retention in higher education. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 127–156). Vanderbilt University.
   Google Scholar
• Salem, A., Dronberger, J., Kos, E., & Wilson, R. (1997). Freshmen in science program. Bioscene, 23, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, C. (2003). The first year and beyond. About Campus, 8(4), 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, L. D., Sjoquist, D. L., & Stephan, P E. (2017). Understanding regression analysis: An introductory guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (2000). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shedlosky-Shoemaker, R., & Fautch, J. M. (2015). Who leaves, who stays? Psychological predictors of undergraduate chemistry students’ persistence. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(3), 408–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sithole, A., Chiyaka, E. T., McCarthy, P., Mupinga, D. M., Bucklein, B. K., & Kibirige, J. (2017). Student attraction, persistence and retention in STEM programs: Successes and continuing challenges. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 46–59.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V (2012). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• United States Air Force Academy (USAFA). (2016). Curriculum handbook. USAFA.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, J., & Mazur, E. (2013). Retaining students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. J. (2018). The experience and persistence of college students in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(4) 413–432.
   Google Scholar