2
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Features

Windows on the Inquiry Classroom: A Pedagogic Field Laboratory for Exploring Teaching and Learning of Heat, Temperature, and Energy

References

  • Abraham, M. R. (2005). Inquiry and the learning cycle approach. In N. J. Pienta, M. M. Cooper, & T. J. Greenbowe (Eds.), Chemists ’guide to effective teaching. (pp. 41–52). Pearson Education.
  • Andrews, T. C., & Lemons, P. P. (2015). It’s personal: Biology instructors prioritize personal evidence over empirical evidence in teaching decisions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1–18.
  • Andrews, T.C., Conaway, E.P., Zhao, J., & Dolan, E.L. (2016). Colleagues as change agents: How department networks and opinion leaders influence teaching at a single research university. CBE—Life Science Education, 15(2), 1–17.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Science, 84(2), 191–215.
  • Bauer, C. F. (2014). Windows on the inquiry classroom: Full course, instructor-and-apprentice annotated video for professional development in STEM inquiry teaching. National Science Foundation award 1245730.
  • Bauer, C. F. (2019). Fire and ice collection. University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository. https://scholars.unh.edu/bauer.
  • Bauer, C. F. (2020). Windows on the inquiry classroom. https://mypages.unh.edu/windows-stem-inquiry.
  • Bauer, C. F., & Chan, J. Y. K. (2016a, March 13-17). Graduate student pedagogic residency in inquiry-based course about concepts of heat. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 251st National Meeting, San Diego, CA.
  • Bauer, C. F., & Chan, J. Y. K. (2016b, July 31-August 4). Conceptual and affective outcomes for nonscience majors in an inquiry course concerning temperature and heat. Biennial Conference on Chemical Education, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO.
  • Bauer, C. F., & Chan, J. Y. K. (2019). Non-science majors learn about heat, temperature, and thermodynamics using the particulate nature of matter and guided-inquiry instruction. American Journal of Physics, 87(7), 550–557.
  • Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and…tensions with professional identity? CBE—Life Sciences Education 11 (4), 339–346.
  • Cavanagh, A. J., Chen, X., Bathgate, M., Frederick, J., Hanauer, D. I., & Graham, M. J. (2018). Trust, growth mindset, and student commitment to active learning in a college science course. CBE-Life Science Education, 17(1), 1–8.
  • Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2010). Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty. American Journal of Physics, 78(10), 1056–1062.
  • Dancy, M., Henderson, C., & Turpin, C. (2016). How faculty learn about and implement research-based instructional strategies: The case of Peer Instruction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010110.
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 111 (23), 8410–8415.
  • Gibbons, R. E., Villafane, S. M., Stains, M., Murphy, K. L., & Raker, J. R. (2018). Beliefs about learning and enacted instructional practices: An investigation in postsecondary chemistry education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(8) 1111–1133.
  • Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984.
  • Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102.
  • Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. (2008). Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Physics, 76(1), 79–91.
  • Hutchings, P. (1998). The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching to advance practice and improve student learning. American Association for Higher Education.
  • Karplus, R., & Their, H. D. (1967). A new look at elementary school science. Rand McNally and Co.
  • Kisa, M. T., & Stein, M. K. (2015). Learning to see teaching in new ways: A foundation for maintaining cognitive demand. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1) 105–136.
  • Lane, A. K., Skvoretz, J., Ziker, J. P., Couch, B. A., Earl, B., Lewis, J. E., McAlpin, J. D., Prevost, L. B., Shadle, S. E., & Stains, M. (2019). Investigating how faculty social networks and peer influence relate to knowledge and use of evidence-based teaching practices. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 28.
  • National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS). (2019). ATLAS (Accomplished Teaching, Learning and Schools). https://www.nbpts.org/atlas
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. The National Academies Press.
  • PhET Interactive Simulations. (2021). https://phet.colorado.edu
  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Prentice Hall.
  • Shadle, S. E., Marker, A., & Earl, B. (2017). Faculty drivers and barriers: Laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 8.
  • Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. Taylor and Francis.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1993). Teaching as community property. Change, 25(6), 6–7.
  • Simonson, S. R., (Ed.). (2019). POGIL: An introduction to process oriented guided inquiry learning for those who wish to empower learners. Stylus Publishing.
  • Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., Eagan, M. K., Jr., Esson, J. M., Knight, J. K., Laski, F. A., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Lee, C. J., Lo, S. M., McDonnell, L. M., McKay, T. A., Michelotti, N., Musgrove, A., Palmer, M. S., Plank, K. M., Rodela, T. M., Sanders, E. R., Schimpf, N. G., Schulte, P. M., Smith, M. K., Stetzer, M., Van Valkenburgh, B., Vinson, E., Weir, L. K., Wendel, P. J., Wheeler, L. B., & Young, A. M. (2018). Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science 359 (6383), 1468–1470.
  • Tch Teaching Channel. (2019). Teaching Channel presents: Inquiry based teaching. https://www.teachingchannel.org/video/tch-presents-inquiry-based-teaching
  • Tinnell, T. L., Ralston, P. A. S., Tretter, T. R., & Mills, M. E. (2019). Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1) 26.
  • Walker, L., & Warfa, A. R. M. (2017). Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) marginally effects student achievement measures but substantially increases the odds of passing a course. PLoS ONE, 12(10), 0186203.
  • WGBH Educational Foundation (2000). Science K-6: Investigating classrooms. http://main.wgbh.org/wgbh/learn/scilib/aboutvid.html

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.